Early to bed, early to rise makes a man healthy, wealthy,and wise.
Benjamin Franklin
Tweet of the Day
Image of the Day: Remember how Trump has called for a boycott of Apple? Guess who got caught using an iPhone? pic.twitter.com/QnYqYM4tnb— Ronald Guillemette (@raguillem) February 20, 2016
Re:Trump's iPhone:Trump says that he also owns and will use a Samsung phone. Trump earlier:South Korea doesn't pay fair share for US defense— Ronald Guillemette (@raguillem) February 20, 2016
I'm waiting for the introduction of the Trump Phone, outsourced overseas. It will no doubt be covered in red, white and blue, FBI approved.— Ronald Guillemette (@raguillem) February 20, 2016
It's a beautiful day in sunny South Carolina, not a Trumperstorm in sight. I went out and did my patriotic chore: I voted against Trump.— Ronald Guillemette (@raguillem) February 20, 2016
Haven't we had enough corrupt deal-making in DC? We don't need a crony capitalist as POTUS exacerbating them. https://t.co/w7RTBwr6pY— Ronald Guillemette (@raguillem) February 20, 2016
This is Soft Rock America. This is dedicated to all South Carolinians with Bush or Clinton signs on their lawns: https://t.co/KjP5lKufxq— Ronald Guillemette (@raguillem) February 20, 2016
Seriously, how stupid is Trump? He is now blaming Paul Ryan for the GOP's 2012 loss to Obama because of Ryan's entitlement proposals.— Ronald Guillemette (@raguillem) February 20, 2016
Trump doesn't grasp the fact we have at least $70T in unfunded liabilities. In essence, we are going to unfairly tax future generations.— Ronald Guillemette (@raguillem) February 20, 2016
Trump is simply thinking with his liberal Democrat political values. Of course, today's political whores want to kick the can down the road.— Ronald Guillemette (@raguillem) February 20, 2016
We might raise roughly $3T/yr in federal revenue; how do we pay down a $19T debt, fund the liabilities, never mind balance the budget?— Ronald Guillemette (@raguillem) February 20, 2016
I'm relieved that there is at least one reponsible Senator on protecting privacy: Rand Paul.: encryption bans no better than gun bans.— Ronald Guillemette (@raguillem) February 20, 2016
You cannot prohibit encryption; you can't put the genie back into the bottle. Even if somehow the govt bans it, the terrorists will have it.— Ronald Guillemette (@raguillem) February 20, 2016
It's so tragic to see Republicans like Sen. Cotton ("Apple is becoming the company of choice for terrorists") piss on the Bill of Rights.— Ronald Guillemette (@raguillem) February 20, 2016
I heard of high turnouts expected for today's SC primary. I'm not saying my late-morning experience was typical, but there were no lines.— Ronald Guillemette (@raguillem) February 20, 2016
The last thing the FBI should be doing is going after companies safeguarding customer data.A hacker recently published data on 20,000 agents— Ronald Guillemette (@raguillem) February 20, 2016
Yesterday was a date that lives in infamy. The fascist FDR signed Executive 9066 allowing the imprisonment of over 100K with Axis ancestry.— Ronald Guillemette (@raguillem) February 20, 2016
Wealth, Poverty and PoliticsThe word is that Clinton won one Nevada precinct tie by drawing an ace from a deck of cards. She's won coin flips in Iowa. Roll dice next?— Ronald Guillemette (@raguillem) February 20, 2016
FBI v Apple
Facebook Corner
via Catholic Libertarians |
What kind of moron thinks that the welfare system's problems are related to immigration? This is fairly transparent xenophobic bullshit.
(follow-up exchange on Catholic Libertarian thread, original comment lead)
I don't agree with Pope Francis on economics, but here he is spot on. The right to migrate is a fundamental aspect of liberty, and Jesus references it in several places even if you somehow ignore the fact that His whole ministry was spent traveling between towns in Israel.The Good Samaritan and Jesus' directive to go and preach the Good News to all make that clear; most of the apostles died away from Israel.
I tried reading through the comments of others but got pissed off, because most of the people whose comments I read are not libertarian. So help me if I read one more idiot talk about welfare systems--what retards! Seriously. With some dark exceptions, like the Chinese Exclusion Act, until WWI, this country practiced virtually open immigration. Immigrants helped us build the greatest economy in the world by the end of the nineteenth century--and there was no welfare system as we know it. There were charitable efforts in the private sector to help newcomers.
The fact of the matter is that the reason we had an unauthorized immigrant problem is because we had abandoned the bracero guest worker program by 1964 under special interest union pressure. As for the libertarians in name only, you sure the hell don't have any right to tell me who I can hire from anywhere in the world, and you can't tell me who I can sell a house to. Immigration restrictions are morally corrupt, pure and simple. Your attempts to control what other people can do ends with your property line.
I would disagree. The US had once a very controlled legalized immigration policy, in fact would stop immigration for periods, as needed. And I would add that the right to legally migrate is an aspect of Liberty, not just illegally circumvent existing systems and controls.
Nope. "Americans encouraged relatively free and open immigration during the 18th and early 19th centuries, and rarely questioned that policy until the late 1800s. " https://www.uscis.gov/.../early-american-immigration...
Other than some racist restrictions, like the Chinese Exclusion Act, we had fairly open immigration until WWI. Around the turn of the 1920's, we saw the morally corrupt quota system (which still exists today in updated form) introduced. It wasn't until about 1965 that the quota system extended to the Americas. Immigration from Mexico and Latin America is a more complicated story beyond this post, but it was a non-issue until labor protectionism during the Depression. Then facing a labor shortage during WWII, a more flexible policy came into play until labor protectionism after the end of WWII. You then saw a wave hit as the US economy prospered.
Eisenhower had a problem but basically legalized migrant workers under the bracero program. The right to migrate is fundamental.http://object.cato.org/.../wp.../uploads/nowrasteh_1.jpg
(separate comment)
I just want to drive home a point here regarding the commenter's description of Statist immigration restrictions. Basically, nobody who believes in free markets can accept the prohibition of migrant workers. Just as a sterile pond will attract no fishermen, a saturated labor market will not attract migrants. Would you spend thousands to get here, only not to find work or a market for your goods? In fact, there was a net outflow during the early years of the Great Recession. Now, if and when there's a market, as the commenter points out, people will work around the laws, whether we are talking alcohol or drug prohibitions--or the labor market. I'm actually amazed any commenting in a libertarian group wouldn't realize the telltale signs of an overregulated economy.
Political Cartoon
Courtesy of Gary Varvel via Townhall |
Stevie Wonder, "Fingertips Parts 1 & 2"