A great pleasure in life is doing what people say you cannot do.
Walter Bagehot
Earlier One-Off Post: The Seventh GOP 2016 Presidential Debate
Tweet of the Day
Democrats never want a good crisis to go to waste,including the government failure of the Flint water crisis.No discussion of privatization.
— Ronald Guillemette (@raguillem) February 1, 2016
Infrastructure should be financed by users, not subsidized by the taxpayer. Boondoggles like supertrains come with high-paying union jobs.
— Ronald Guillemette (@raguillem) February 1, 2016
AP is projecting Cruz to win IA with 89% of the caucuses reporting. Cruz 27.7 Trump 24.4 Rubio 23. Trump LOSES. Cruz sets vote record.— Ronald Guillemette (@raguillem) February 2, 2016
For those dreaming of Bush vs. Clinton this fall, IA is not a good sign. With 89% of the vote, Jeb has 2.8%; Clinton has melting 0.2% lead.— Ronald Guillemette (@raguillem) February 2, 2016
FNC showing Clinton 50%, Sanders 50%, O'Malley 1%. Okay, is this new math?— Ronald Guillemette (@raguillem) February 2, 2016
The pundits thought a big turnout favored Trump over Cruz. Turnout was almost 50% over 2012 record. So much for polls and political pundits.— Ronald Guillemette (@raguillem) February 2, 2016
Most interesting new PAC: the anti-Trump "Make America Awesome (America is Already Great)". I'm not the only one who loathes Trump's slogan.— Ronald Guillemette (@raguillem) February 2, 2016
Besides Trump, the big losers of the Cruz Iowa win include Big Ethanol and their champion, Gov. Branstad who spearheaded the anti-Cruz vote— Ronald Guillemette (@raguillem) February 2, 2016
It looks like Huckabee and O'Malley are quitting their races. I suffered for years as a Maryland resident and am glad to see O'Malley done.— Ronald Guillemette (@raguillem) February 2, 2016
How effective was Trump's strategy of selling out to Big Ethanol in attacking Cruz,skipping the Iowa debate and winning Palin's endorsement?— Ronald Guillemette (@raguillem) February 2, 2016
This is Soft Rock America and Ted Cruz wants to send out this tune dedicated to Donald Trump: https://t.co/PQnevFuvLl— Ronald Guillemette (@raguillem) February 2, 2016
John Dingell (D-MI) tried to tweak Cruz: "Congratulations to Ted Cruz on winning the critically important primary state". Caucus,not primary— Ronald Guillemette (@raguillem) February 2, 2016
Little observed fact: in largely white Iowa, two Latinos won over 50% of the 2016 GOP caucus votes.— Ronald Guillemette (@raguillem) February 2, 2016
Image of the DayOne of the most stunning results is Rubio finishing a closer third behind Trump than Trump's second to Cruz. Rubio is the electable choice.— Ronald Guillemette (@raguillem) February 2, 2016
The Iowa Caucuses
Originally I thought of writing a one-off post on the caucuses but decided to merge it in my daily post. As I write, roughly at 2:30 AM, 99% of the vote is in, and Cruz, who led all evening, has won by an unexpected 3.4% at just under 28%; Cruz had lost a long string of recent polls, including some reported today in RCP. I wrote a number of relevant tweets above, but probably the most surprising is that most pundits thought a heavy turnout helped Trump. Make no mistake: Trump won his fair share of new voters, but the Cruz grassroots game got the job done.
Let's be clear: Trump has a huge lead in NH and Cruz, despite Iowa, has an uphill battle. A primary is more difficult,and conservatives don't run as well in New England. I do think Cruz and close third-place Rubio will get some lift in the polls. Not sure yet, but it's possible that Rubio peels off some Kasich, Christie, and Bush support. I think Trump wins but it will be tighter than recent polls indicate. I think the real story in NH is who finishes second and third. I think Cruz and Rubio need to sustain their momentum. Obviously if the governors fail, it's difficult to see how they get through Super Tuesday. I think Christie is most vulnerable; his message is that he can win blue or purple states like NJ. I don't see him able to survive an out-of-the-money finish. I still think Bush stays through Florida, but a weak finish there basically eliminates him.
For Trump, he can try to manipulate opinions by suggesting Iowa was never winnable months back, but be clear: he won a long string of poll wins going into the contest. More importantly, he had built this "winning" talking point, and his invincibility has now been dashed. He looked on the way to run the table and a sweep would have probably made SC and FL, where he now has leads, inevitable. So I don't think his shock and awe campaign is now viable; Cruz is really eying Super Tuesday, including his home state of TX; he wants to at least finish in the money until then.
At last glance, Clinton had a 0.3% lead over Sanders with 99% of the vote. It all depends where those votes are, but she has been clinging to a similar lead since at least 84% of the vote, and I think Sanders has run out of territory to score. This lessens the impact of a two-loss start, but let's be clear: like Trump, she had been leading in a string of polls going into the caucuses and Sanders for all practical purposes tied her in Iowa. Clinton will likely sweep through Super Tuesday, but I think if she had lost Iowa, it could have given Sanders momentum and potential upsets through Super Tuesday.
A Dad's Gift of Love To His Daughter
How A Baby Boy Saved 3 Lives
Political Cartoon
Courtesy of Henry Payne via Townhall |
Juice Newton, "Heart of the Night". There are a couple of hits left in this series; we'll start Jim Croce later this week.