Analytics

Monday, September 30, 2019

Post #4280 M: 70 Years of Communist Chinese Repression; Morally Corrupt Reparations

Quote of the Day

If instead of a gem, or even a flower, 
we should cast the gift of a loving thought into the heart of a friend, 
that would be giving as the angels give.
George MacDonald 

Investing in the Age of Trump

In a reader drought where my readership seems to struggle just to get to double-digits, at least one post has quietly built into a semi-viral status, picking up 3 or 4 pageviews a day well over a week since publication (it's fairly unusual to get that response from most posts more than a day or two after initial publication. Maybe it's the intriguing title (here a heading) or some of my advice.

One brief followup: sometimes you have to ride out this Trump mini-corrections like last Friday's sudden drop in the market, which seem provoked by rumors that Trump was going to seek delisting of Chinese shares. There's been a pattern of Trump saying stupid things about trade which will take down the market a point or two. Eventually the market fights its way back up over the next few sessions. There are no guarantees the trend is sustainable; I'm still holding some cash on the sidelines and aren't really in a hurry to buy into a Trump dip. I'm constantly reevaluating current holdings. Tech stocks are still about 4% off their highs, and there seemed to be a short-term trend into value stocks. But I'm really picky at this time, and nothing is exciting me. The third quarter seemed to hold its own, despite Trump's idiotic tweets.

70 Years of Communist Chinese Repression


Morally Corrupt Reparations



Ron Paul on Reported Houthi Victory Over Saudi Coalition



Choose Life








Political Cartoon

Courtesy of Tom Stiglich via Townhall


Musical Interlude: My Favorite Vocalists

Gloria Estefan/Miami Sound Machine, "Bad Boy". Second straight top 10.




Sunday, September 29, 2019

Post $4279 M: Hoppe on Decay of US Society; Napolitano: a History Lesson on Liberty

Quote of the Day

Time and money spent in helping men do more for themselves is far better than mere giving.
Henry Ford  

Hoppe on Decay of US Society



Napolitano: A History Lesson on Liberty



McClanahan on Forgotten Conservatives in American History



Choose Life









Political Cartoon


Political Cartoons by Pat Cross
Courtesy of Pat Cross via Townhall


Musical Interlude: My Favorite Vocalists

Gloria Estefan/Miami Sound Machine, "Conga"

Post #4278: Rant of the Day: YES, Trump is Guilty of an Impeachable Offense

It's no secret I'be previously called for the impeachment of Trump, particularly on Twitter. Just to cite a few examples of things I believe have violated his constitutional oath:

  • his illegal diversions of appropriated funds for building his southern border wall in defiance of Congressional spending authority, where such authority was explicitly denied
  • his attempts to quash the Russian investigation, despise his explicit vested interest, including but not restricted to the termination of Comey and repeated threats against principals of the investigation, including Sessions, Rosenstein, and of course Mueller himself
  • his unconstitutional unprovoked military attack on Syria and prosecution of expanded undeclared drone wars without Congressional authority
  • his abuse of the veto authority, e.g., on the "national emergency" for wall building and on funding for Saudi Arabia's military intervention in Yemen. In effect, Trump transformed Congress' spending authority to super-majority status as to his authoritarian decisions.
  • Trump has inappropriately intervened in justice matters, notably including the Bergdahl court-martial, in which Trump as Commander-in-Chief attacking Bergdahl, compromising his rights to a fair trial. 
Now comes the question of Trump's conversation with Ukraine Presidency Zelensky, as recently referenced by a whistleblower. There seems to be a kerfuffle over whether Trump negotiated a quid pro quo with respect to alleged wrongdoings of political rival Joe Biden and his son. I don't care whether Trump engaged in a smoking gun, direct linkage or a "wink and a nod" indirect linkage. Let's be clear:

The President: Well it’s very nice of you to say that. I will say that we do a lot for Ukraine. We spend a lot of effort and a lot of time....A lot of the European countries [have done close to nothing for Ukraine] so I think it’s something you want to look at but the United States has been very very good to Ukraine.

Okay, this is a not-so-subtle reminder that Ukraine doesn't have a lot of friends, the US has been a reliable ally, and [unspoken but clearly implied] Trump has a lot of say over continued support of the Ukraine. He also explicitly points out in the same quote that Ukraine hasn't done much in return for US support. (See the cited NYT piece for the full quote.] This is an obvious harbinger that Trump wants something in return for sustaining the relationship.

The PresidentI would like you to do us a favor though because our country has been through a lot and Ukraine knows a lot about it. I would like you to find out what happened with this whole situation with Ukraine, they say Crowdstrike...I would like to have the Attorney General call you or your people and I would like you to get to the bottom of it

This appears to be in reference to a Giuliani hypothesis that Ukraine was somehow implicated in the theft of DNC emails prior to the 2016 election.

The PresidentMr. Giuliani is a highly respected man. He was the mayor of New York City, a great mayor, and I would like him to call you. I will ask him to call you along with the Attorney General. Rudy very much knows what’s happening and he is a very capable guy. If you could speak to him that would be great....The other thing, There’s a lot of talk about Biden’s son, that Biden stopped the prosecution and a lot of people want to find out about that so whatever you can do with the Attorney General would be great. Biden went around bragging that he stopped the prosecution so if you can look into it... It sounds horrible to me.

Now we're getting to the main course. Trump is trying to manipulate Zelensky, arguing that Biden interfered in Ukraine's internal affairs to prevent prosecution of his son, Hunter, and it's in new President Zelenwky's political interest to reopen the case. Trump is willing to give Zelensky full access to Trump's people, including Giuliani and AG Barr, to facilitate prosecution of the Bidens, something that no doubt adversely affect the viability of political rival Biden's campaign. There is no legitimate national interest in raising the topic of Biden in the conversation. This is Trump's abusing his office, his role in conducting foreign relations, for personal, political gain. It's intrinsically corrupt, self-serving, and unconstitutional.

Zelensky: I would kindly ask you if you have any additional information that you can provide to us, it would be very helpful for the investigation

The Prewidenr: I will have Mr. Giuliani give you a call and I am also going to have Attorney General Barr call and we will get to the bottom of it. 

Zelensky doesn't promise that a reopened case will give Trump the outcome he is looking for, but he would be open to Trump's legal bitches providing relevant evidence. Again, Trump is using taxpayer-paid resources (Giuliani and Barr) for purposes benefiting not US interests but at the expense of his political rival, Biden.

“I do not want Ukraine to again be the subject of U.S. presidential elections,” [Ukraine Prosecutor General] Lutsenko said in an interview Tuesday in his office in Kiev. “Hunter Biden did not violate any Ukrainian laws -- at least as of now, we do not see any wrongdoing. A company can pay however much it wants to its board.” He said if there is a tax problem, it’s not in Ukraine.

There is no way to spin this to benefit Trump. What he did was for the benefit of his own political self-interest. It is blatantly unconstitutional and a violation of his oath of office. Congressional Republicans are in the hotseat. Just like Senate Democrats in effect argued what Clinton did was wrong but not serious enough to warrant removal from office, Republicans may argue that what Trump did is not serious enough to warrant removal, with the national election just over 13 months away.

Trump has been playing with fire his whole term of office. I've made it clear if I were in Congress, I would vote to impeach him and remove him for office. That being said, I never bought into the Russian collusion conspiracy, and I don't think that Statist Dems have any issue with Trump's authoritarian impulses, the imperial Presidency, as I do; it's mostly politically based. But I have ZERO empathy for Trump; he brought this on himself.

Saturday, September 28, 2019

Post #4277 M: Climate Activist Thunberg to Developing Countries: Drop Dead; Ron Paul on Cherokee Lizzie's Wealth Tax

Quote of the Day

A leader must have the courage to act against an expert's advice.

James Callaghan  

Thunberg to Developing Countries: Drop Dead


Ron Paul on Cherokee Lizzie's Wealth Tax



Quotas and Minority Education



Political Cartoon


Courtesy of Pat Cross via Townhall


Musical Interlude: My Favorite Vocalists

George Michael, "Fastlove". George's last major hit to date and marks the end of my retrospective. Next up: Gloria Estefan.

Post #4276 J; Beware of Senior Scams; Working with Indians

Senior Citizen Scams

I think all of us are shocked when we first recognize the signs of getting older; With me, with me it was seeing a first gray hair near the tip of my sideburns. There were other irrefutable signs, like my little sister becoming a grandmother, although she was a young bride in her teens who quickly started a family, and my 16-year-old niece got pregnant. And of course, you get the first of literally hundreds of junk mail from AARP, even before you turn 50.

But an ugly fact of life is that criminals are lured by huge government spending programs, especially senior entitlements (i.e., social security and Medicare. My Mom, who still has a landline, got targeted recently. She filters a lot of incoming calls using caller id. She got a call recently which her caller id identified as coming from her own phone number. She, correctly, refused to take the call, but didn't know how this was possible. I personally hadn't encountered it, but email scammers spoof personally email addresses all the time. (Every once in a while when I check my spam filter, I'll see emails purportedly coming from my own email account.) I suggested this was a similar ploy by scammers looking to get past the use of caller id to ignore unfamiliar phone numbers. But more to the point, a simple Google search on salient terms soon exposed a well-known scam; to give a sample example, consider this link: https://philadelphia.cbslocal.com/2018/04/11/scam-own-phone-number-calls/ (This is over and beyond common sense facts like you can't call yourself from your own phone.)

I've myself been exposed to 2 similar scams, which I hadn't heard of before, but I'm exposing as a warning to others:

  • One of these was somewhat ingenious in my context because in the past I have worked on federal contracts requiring government background investigations. In 2014, I was up for a Q clearance (Department of Energy), which had dragged on for months, a prerequisite for a contingent job offer for a subcontracting gig via Bechtel in Pittsburgh. (I eventually took an offer from South Carolina.) 
Now I had been contacted by an investigator/point of contact; she had identified herself, and there were ways to verify she was a legitimate contact. (I have occasionally written about elements of this process. She interviewed me personally at a fast food place (originally it was supposed to be at a library but it was closed on that day) for it must have been 90 minutes or more over my 60-page or so background paperwork. Then I got a phone call, apparently in response to an interview with my landlady, where she learned my first week in WV I had booked a room at a local hotel at my personal expense, not reimbursed. (I actually signed a lease my first day on the job, but it took a week to get Internet service set up, a requirement for my contractor employer). So the investigator accused me of a material omission in my background report, which was a joke; she claimed she needed to interview the hotel manager about me. (Could you imagine if this had followed my road warrior days where I spent innumerable days in a wide variety of hotels?) Then an investigator (in name only) had accusingly reported back that my reported headquarters for a prior employer in 2009-2010 was vacant. Apparent I, with the assistance of Google, discovered they lost their key contract recompete, and I found the CEO's resume on LinkedIn, showing the company folded in 2012. 
So I got this weird recorded voicemail (at least 3 times" with a weird ominous comically loud blurb of "Federal Investigation", saying that investigators were attempting to get in touch with me (although there was no personal reference to me, a specific investigator or a phone number I could vet the source)). I couldn't reverse trace the target phone number, so it likely wasn't a government number. But the message was coincidental because there were legitimate reasons an investigator could be reaching out to me (beyond the scope of this post). So I did call back once, and almost immediately, it came up as phony. It sounded like this guy was in a scam boiler room. He claimed that he needed my social security number to identify the investigator assigned to my case, that that was their standard operating procedure. I knew this was bullshit, and my scammer alert went on overdrive; I hung up and reported it to an employer representative. 
  • I guess after their initial attempts didn't work, they or others started a new attempt, this time reportedly from the social security administration, claiming my social security number account had been suspended over suspicion of fraudulent use. I could call the (boiler room) number for more details. It does take chutzpah for a scammer to hype concerns of social security fraud as a ruse to collect social security numbers. This was so obviously a scam I never even bothered to make a call. (I will point out I periodically check on my social security account, and I have configured alerts.)
So, summarizing, be suspicious of calls, emails, etc., purporting to be from the government. A legitimate government official will NEVER use you for PII; if there is a need to know, they have alternative access without coming to you. If an official contacts you, there should be an independent verification of this official from official sources.

Let's be clear: parasitic thieves victimizing the elderly, often on limited, fixed incomes, is a violation against the natural right of property; it's morally outrageous.

My Pet Peeve Against (Asian) Indian Recruiters Continues

I'm sure that many reading this heading will suspect a "racist" motivation. I could point out some of my best friends in the IT profession have been Indian. (But it comes across as defensive, sort of like "some of my best friends are black".) I don't identify friends and relatives in my blog, especially without their knowledge and permission. 

But I have previously mentioned RN. Back in 1999, I was recruited by an agency as a temp resource from the Chicago area to work a bridge 5-week or so subcontract role to fill in for their DBA who had resigned (and the Santa Clara company was in a state of denial about the market value of DBAs).  Originally the contracting company was holding out for a bargain-basement rate. I would later befriend RN, a systems analyst then a H1B seeking his green card. He would later tell me how he ended up having to find his new gig after his prior gigs (including one with Cisco had expired); our client was paying a bargain-basement rate for him, and our company (I was a subcontractor and he was perm) responded by cutting his pay and/or promised bonus. (To this day, I am revolted by the exploitation of H1Bs by their sponsor.) I think the former DBA and his female accounting manager friend, both Filipino immigrants I believe, disliked RN with a passion; my first week on the job, RN was at some training facility in another state, and the DBA, (Vince) transitioning me at the end of his 2-week notice, routinely badmouthed RN behind his back. I don't know the whole story, but apparently Vince had quit because he wasn't named to the vacant IT manager position and that he had promised the accountant a spot (as systems analyst?) on his team. 

There is a whole soap opera over what happened next. The rumor is that Vince got fired on his new consulting job by his second day for lying about his experience on his resume. I had soon discovered that the company's ERP (Oracle EBS) system was literally years behind in compliance patches, and the accountants were continuing to work in green screen/character mode , which Oracle had desupported some 6 months earlier. So I aggressively pushed for compliance patching. Susan (the accounting manager) would try to blame every new tech issue on my patching, totally oblivious that Oracle would not support a system out of patch compliance. One minor example is the patching had overwritten a custom check with a generic one, something that literally took less than 15 minutes to fix.

In the interim SS, a former Tyco IT manager, had come on board as the new IT manager, and RN and I were his proteges. RN became his new project manager, and one of the first things SS did was to fire a consulting effort headed by a former company manager from their former Buffalo Grove, IL (Chicago NW suburb) headquarters on a Clarify implementation. The project had achieved no progress over the prior 8 months despite high costs. Basically RN and I (with some contractor developers) achieved more in 3 months what they did in 8. But the former manager used his contacts at our Japan owner headquarters to appeal the termination and particularly SS. It ultimately failed.

Susan had used her influence (the controller at that point was SS's boss) to get Vince rehired. Now SS had been privately trying to get me to come on perm, but the fact is I had a standard clause in my contract saying the clients couldn't hire me for at least 6 months after the end of my work assignment. Of course, everything is negotiable if the company was willing to part with a substantial finder's fee. But I had no intention of waiting 6 months without pay for a new offer. So I basically sidestepped SS' overtures. Besides, I had ZERO interest in moving to California.

So SS, as a concession to his new boss, agreed to rehire; I personally was pissed that Vince had done ZERO to get us into patch compliance and opposed the rehire--but I knew the bridge contract was soon to expire. SS wanted me to stay in charge of the EBS database because of recent patching in the interim, which infuriated Vince. (Vince would later claim he wanted to do patching, but his bosses had refused.) At some point, Vince and Susan started a rumor that I claimed that SS was trying to hire me perm. There was absolutely no truth to the rumor (I mean, yes, Steve had flirted with hiring me, but I never told anyone--and I wasn't interested in the job.) I had specifically told Vince I expected to be rolled off later that month, and everything would be transitioning to him. But SS was absolutely livid at me, fully buying into the false rumor, claiming that I had sabotaged his effort to hire me perm.

And then Vince suddenly resigned less than 2 weeks into his rehire. It seems that his prior employer had offered him a job with stock options. (Recall this was 1999..) Susan would later blame me for the fact Vince resigned his job again.

RN would later tell me that he was the one who had picked out my resume and championed my hiring. SS would later make me the "job offer by extortion"  several weeks later. I was about to leave for my Friday night SFO flight to Chicago when SS told me not to bother coming back Monday if I didn't accept a perm job offer then and there; let's be clear. I had nothing else lined up for Monday; as much as I hate California, I hated unemployment more. I pointed out that I had a contract and they could sue me for breach. He laughed and said he had leverage. (In essence, the contractors had stupidly invoiced the client for less than my own rate, never mind travel expenses. So they would lose massively if Steve simply paid off the invoices.)  Of course, my contractor employers went batshit crazy; "Benedict Arnold' was one of the tamer things they called me. But if Steve had ended the contract, they would have fired me in a split second. And the fact is that I had extended a 5-week contract to 3 months of billing.

RN and I did some incredible things in a skeleton IT department of about 15 people for a multi-million dollar company. I sometimes joked we were like the Lennon-McCartney of Oracle. He busted the hype saying that he had done some amazing things with others as well. We frequented one of his favorite Indian buffets in nearby Sunnyvale. He was quite passionate about his political beliefs, in particularly on Kashmir and Pakistan's Musharraf, whom he despised. 

When my former contractor got acquired, SS hopes that RN would get lost in the shuffle, but they soon reassigned RN to a project near San Francisco with a better billing rate. SS was openly threatening suing them (he was willing to raise the rate, on the condition RN get all the increase, but that wasn't going to happen); I was afraid SS threatened RN's position, just as he was nearing the home stretch of his green card. 

RN had served as a buffer between Steve and me. I was working long hours (like 70 hours a week), my fitness club (Bally's) then had no local locations and my weight got to around 300 lbs. Steve was writing checks on my back; he had resurrected a Web Expenses project in November, a 6-month project, for go-live in late January; while I was on a brief holiday visit home in Texas, MT called me and said SS had told them (out for training other branches in early January) to start filing their expense reports in production. In other words, he had unilaterally moved forward go-live 3 weeks before our negotiated go-live date. I didn't even have the software installed in production. Not to mention he was supposed to transition managers to a new email system, but as a political concession had agreed to allow a 6-month delay. Now that might sound "reasonable", but the email domain was different depending on the product; the wrong email address meant the manager didn't get notifications and the notifications would get lost in the system. Now if you didn't know, expense reimbursements can get very political; employees are very sensitive about prompt reimbursement. Steve just had a habit of doing very risky things without advising me. I literally overheard him telling a fellow manager to submit his expense report to the CEO, and I'm literally  running to my cubicle to check the CEO's email address in the database.

 I had developed a stress-induced cough my Mom had noticed and nagged me into checking with clueless doctors (one claimed I was recovering from a cold). (I didn't even know there was such a thing as a stress-induced cough.) More worrisome to me, I have a decent singing voice (I was in my high school choir), but I literally found my vocal range cut down to like 2 or 3 notes; my voice would literally go silent outside that narrow range. I didn't know what was going on, and it was scaring the crap out of me. Note: 2 weeks after I finally resigned, the cough disappeared, and my singing voice was back to normal.

When RN left, I got a full dose of Steve, and it was driving me crazy. I had scheduled an in-person job interview for an Austin-based real estate portal (I had been trying for years to get a job back in Texas) when my boss suffered a heart attack at a Vermont branch. (He had earlier admitted to me he had had heart incidents/attacks (?) and swore me to secrecy.) If I had left then, it would have been a disaster for the company. So I canceled the Austin visit (and they never forgave me). Steve gave me a raise in May plus a bonus spread out over 6 months, to give me an incentive to stay, but I ended up resigning 2 months later.

RN got his green card some time after I had left and immediately accepted Steve's offer. At this point, Steve was reporting directly to the CEO. I remember I asked him if he planned to become a citizen, and he responded with an irate rant "Why does everybody ask me that?" A few years later, he casually mentioned in an email that he had been sworn in as a US citizen. I said, "Rahul, why didn't you tell me? I would have flown in to be there."

I don't know the specifics but Steve started running into political issues at the company. He was no longer reporting to the CEO, and the rumor was he stopped coming into work on a normal schedule. RN was named acting manager, and Steve considered him a Benedict Arnold. Ultimately Steve left the company, and RN was named the permanent IT manager, and the last time we emailed he was still there. I think they had just gone through a merger. (The company makes and services chip-testing equipment.)


Now RN was different than a lot of Indians I've worked with. At the risk of oversimplification, this summarizes some of my experiences:

  • Indians tend to be highly sensitive over losing face, e.g., not wanting to be seen as making a mistake or don't understand something or a task is beyond their current skills, knowledge or experience. They want to tell you what they think you want to hear. Now quite often to resolve an issue you want to know a status directly rather than having to navigate around a person's defensiveness.
  • Communicating is often what I analogize as having to thread a needle. It's difficult to describe, but you get a response which is inconsistent with the context, possibly related to my first point. I have bragged as a professor, I could often ask the same test question 6 different ways. It can be exhausting having to constantly rephrase things until my point gets across. It's exhausting work. Yes, they speak English, but not American English, which many Americans find frustrating with help desk support from India. I once asked RN why I found it much easier to converse with him, and he said, "Dude, I had been working with Americans and others for 15 years before moving to the US."
  • They can be cliquish. There are several examples from a few Indian-American owned companies or managers in my experience.  There have been co-workers who would report to Indian managers behind my back. Let me give a couple of examples. When I was a contractor DBA at National Archives, I had to share passwords with an Indian developer who served as my backup of sorts. Once he sent me with his password list and demanded that I review and correct any, as if I was his goddamn secretary. I effectively said, "Dude! It is your responsibility to maintain and check your password list. If you run into a problem, let me know, and I'll give you the correct one." (I always communicated changes but had no control over what they did/didn't do with them.) He didn't like that and filed a complaint. A second example I've probably posted elsewhere involving my last project with IBM. Our business unit included a team of commodity novice "DBAs" in Bangalore. Basically I had to take an unconventional EBS implementation by a prior management consultancy, a de facto poison pill, not to mention no patching in 18 months. The fact of the matter was my Indian boss RK was totally clueless about what the status quo was; their basic migration was from cookie cutter implementation. What I had to do was redesign things like doing a crossword puzzle in ink, never mind Oracle certainly would not have certified what I inherited, maybe even my efforts to get us back on track. So my boss demanded that the client and their current consultants patch the EBS, which was laughably never going to happen. So I'm working the migration from hell and we should have billed the customer a fortune for what I was doing. When all was said and done, though, the freaking DBA manager in India was pissed I hadn't delegated enough billable cookie cutter tasks and so was going to refuse supporting the client's database. I would have fired that son of a bitch for cause so fast his head would spin. But to give examples of Indian performance issues on this side of the pond: the designated "project manager" had not secured production server resources (in Arizona) literally less than a week before "go live". So I'm having to agitate for resources. And even when I get them, they haven't been deployed correctly. I'm finding overnight a tape file dump only amounted to 38MB overnight; file transfers between servers is taking forever. So I'm literally having to order courier transport of computer media, escalate things like the system and network admins. The guy who reported only 38MB: think he's going to escalate the issue on his own? Of course not. Finally, and I've mentioned this in earlier posts, my Indian developer colleague near client facilities in Florida was planning to work remotely from home a few miles away. I personally asked him 2-3 times if he had tested connections, and he didn't respond. So he was responsible for doing a number of QC checks after I finish my work. So I work like hell to get things done by Saturday noon and call him to start his part. Um, he calls back saying he can't connect. IBM has a skeleton shift working on weekends. I urge him to go to the facility. (Hello, contingency planning? What the hell is that?) "No, I'm not on the list. Can you call your client manager? No, I'm not going to do that; it can wait until Monday." Are you freaking kidding me? He just blew off 2 days in a go-live schedule. People have been fired over lesser things. But let me leave this discussion with my amiable ex-boss RK. During my earlier efforts doing a test migration, the database crashed with complications is recovery. Long story short, the Unix system manager discovers his employee violated his department's standards in deploying storage. So the son of a bitch, looking for a convenient scapegoat to blame, tries to blame ME for not reviewing what HIS employee is doing. And RK AGREES with him. Say, what? I  didn't deploy storage against standard. The Unix admin doesn't report to me; those are not MY standards to enforce. Under what Alice in Wonderland universe does this become my responsibility?
There are lots of other examples; my deal taking me back to Illinois  included coverage of relocation; I used the same movers as my Indian developer colleague (who had earlier moved from California). The Indian VP exploded when he saw the bill (which was $3K less than my move to CA), and threatened not to pay, arguing I had been swindled. This is the same dude who had demanded, 2 days before I was scheduled to move over the weekend, demanding that I do a test upgrade over the coming week (not even part of the contract). I had no choice but to cancel my trip home. Not to mention the landlord had already rented out my apartment, I had to reschedule movers, car transport, flights, etc.Not only that but the local county was hosting the state fair, and I had no reservations (I've also discussed this in past posts.) Not to mention another Indian company hired me to work in MD (National Archives) and refused to repay my moving expenses as agreed on, because I didn't submit my receipts fast enough. 

I could go on and on, talking about interviews staffed entirely by Indians, never winning a bid from an Indian staffing agency, etc. It's tough bidding against someone living out of a suitcase. 

So in summary there are challenges in working with Indians. I'm not necessarily claiming that my experiences are generalizable. To see an alternative consideration, see here.

As for my experience with Indian recruiters, just to give a sample of pet peeves:
  • too high-maintenance. I've literally had over a dozen contacts over short periods of time. It's generally not worth my time and effort.
  • too much busy work: whether we are talking skill  matrices or the same goddamn lists of questions,including location, email, phone, prospective relocation date, rate requirement, LinkedIn link, Skype ID, etc. Most of these are in the resume they have.
  • the haggling after an agreement. After we come to a settlement on rate, they call back saying it's not doable and want to chop off $10-15/hour off the rate.
  • communication issues (see above)
  • cold or near cold calls. I often see a Gmail notification as or after getting an unsolicited call.
  • too many unacceptable gigs. I will not consider the West Coast, IL or the NE. I've been a DBA for 25 years; I'm not likely to be considered for other, less experienced gigs
Almost 80% of the job emails I get are from Indian recruiters. The vast majority are inapplicable. I sometimes think it's a form of harassment. If you are an Indian recruiter, it's highly unlikely I will respond to your email or return your call. But no matter how many times I unsubscribe or whatever, they still come. Could it be former  bosses or colleagues with an ax to grind? Maybe. I'm annoyed it takes a split second to delete an email or voicemail.

I know there are a number of good Indians like RN. I have worked or studied with a number of good people from India, Pakistan, and Bangladesh. But I've given some examples of challenges I've had with others.

BEB Update

My former UH office mate, fellow PhD student is recovering from a massive stroke in early June. I've been summarizing salient elements from his spouse Susan in a CaringBridge blog.

Bruce still hasn't progressed to eating a normal diet, in part presumably to some swallowing issues. He's had a persistent issue tolerating his nutritional formulas, and it's sometimes manifested itself in vomiting or related issues during physical therapy. He has also experienced some issues with prescribed medications. Quite often he's frustrated with his limitations. He's doing well with cognitive and communication issues and is building endurance in standing and other physical therapy.

Friday, September 27, 2019

Post #4275 M: The Decentralized Web; No to Political Whores Over Big Tech; McClanahan: Think Locally, Act Locally

Quote of the Day

The weak can never forgive. Forgiveness is the attribute of the strong.
Mahatma Ghandi  

The Decentralized Web is Coming



No to Political Whores over Big Tech


McClanahan on Think Locally, Act Locally



Choose Life









Political Cartoon

Courtesy of AF Branco via Townhall

Musical Interlude: My Favorite Vocalists

George Michael, "Jesus to a Child"

Thursday, September 26, 2019

Post #4274 M: The Babylon Bee; New FreedomToon

Quote of the Day

The key to being a good manager is
 keeping the people who hate me away from 
those who are still undecided.
Casey Stengel  

The Babylon Bee



Larry Elder's Big Brother



Choose Life









Political Cartoon



Musical Interlude: My favorite Vocalists

George Michael (with Queen), "Someone to Love"

Wednesday, September 25, 2019

Post #4273 M: Tolerance is a Conservative Issue; Ron Paul on REAL Whistleblowera

Quote of the Day

You must lose a fly to catch a trout. 
George Herbert 

Is College Worth It?



Tolerance is a Conservative Virtue



Ron Paul on REAL Whistleblowers



Choose Life









Political Cartoon

Courtesy of Steve Breen via Townhall


Musical Interlude: My Favorite Vocalists

George Michael, "Too Funky"

Tuesday, September 24, 2019

Post #4272 M: It's NOT the Market vs. the Planet; Stossel on Living Free at Sea

Quote of the Day

The palest ink is better than the best memory.
Chinese Proverb


Stossel on Living Free at Sea



Tom Woods on Sanders and National Rent Control



Choose Life









Political Cartoon



Musical Interlude: My Favorite Vocalists

George Michael (with Elton John), "Don't Let the Sun Go Down on Me" #1.


Monday, September 23, 2019

Post #4271 M: How Government Made Me Fat;' Why I Am a Globalist

Quote of the Day

A great pilot can sail even when his canvas is torn. 
Seneca  

How Government Made Me Fat



Why I am a Globalist



Tom Woods on the Google Archipelago


Choose Life









Political Cartoon

Courtesy of Gary Varvel via Townhall


Musical Interlude: My Favorite Vocalists

George Michael, "Waiting For That Day"


Sunday, September 22, 2019

Post #4270 M: Ron Paul on Negative Interest Rates; McClanahan on Robert E Lee

Quote of the Day

But be ye doers of the word, 
and not hearers only deluding your own selves 
James 1:22  

Ron Paul on Negative Interest Rates



McClanahan on a Robert E Lee Biography



Why People Adopt Politically Correct Views



Choose Life









Political Cartoon

Courtesy of AF Branco via Townhall


Musical Interlude: My Favorite Vocalists

George Michael, "Freedom '90"

Saturday, September 21, 2019

Post #4269 M: An Antiwar Conservative; Blockchain as Infernet; China's Immoral One-Child Policy Backfiring


Quote of the Day

Courtesy of AZ Quotes


An Antiwar Conservative



Blockchain as Internet



Unintended Consequences of China's One Child Policy



Choose Life











Political Cartoon

Courtesy of Henry Payne via Townhall

Musical Interlude: My Favorite Vocalists

George Michael, "Praying For Time". #1.

Friday, September 20, 2019

Post # 4268 M: The Hong Kong Protests; Tom Woods and Peter Schiff; Why Are Intellectualists Socialists?

Quote of the Day

If you can't explain it simply, you don't understand it well enough.
Albert Einstein

The Hong Kong Protests



Tom Woods and Peter Schiff



Why Are Intellectuals Socialists?



Choose Life









Political Cartoon

Courtesy of Steve Kelley via Townhall


Musical Interlude: My Favorite Vocalists

George Michael, "Kissing a Fool". Another in an incredible streak of about a dozen Top 10 hits.

Post #4267 J: Investing in the Age of Trump

Investments: Time For a Contrarian View?

Well, if there's anything that will humble you, it's reading (via Microsoft home page clickbait) about a young (23-year-old) Latino, not even a college graduate. pulling down $230K a year. Most of his income comes from being a utility worker, averaging 60 hours a week, including lucrative overtime. He also has a lawn/snow removal business, not to mention he's started to collect real estate properties; I think 4 now plus an aggressive plan to add 4 or 5 properties a year over the near future. His hope is to be a millionaire by the time he's 30. Yeah, I remember being a newly minted PhD/professor at the age of 30. As a graduate student, I had made out a $15 wedding gift check to my Newman Association friends Rob and Sheila, only to see it bounce. (I thought I had $100 in my account.) I was better off by the time I graduated, thanks to winning one of 4 university-wide competitive fellowships and a small dissertation grant to augment my modest teaching fellow stipend (which barely covered my living and school costs).

One of the few good things I did do was max out my 403B benefits during my 5-year career as professor. It was more limited while I was at UTEP, because they figured in I would vest in the university match after my first year; then UTEP stole my $4000, something for which I'll never forgive them. Still, I have multiplied that initial nest egg of original contributions multiple times over the years on my own (self-directed) and I have an above average nest egg (probably not that surprising given the fact I've never been married, don't have a mortgage, and I stayed with my last car, a discontinued Olds for 15 years after paying it off.

Am I an investing "genius"? No. My brokerage vendor points out when I review my performance over the past 10 years I could have done much better just depositing everything in an S&P index fund. This goes beyond, "Why didn't I invest in Microsoft when I was a professor? [I was one of the earliest Microsoft Word users, and I had an early version of Windows on my UWM PC--my procurement, but a standard product install. Google, Apple, or Amazon? " I've cashed out before a stock recovered, I didn't let my winners run (e.g., I might have cashed out after a 7.5% gain, only to see it tack on another 20-30%) I failed to cut bait on my tech investments during the 2000-2002 Nasdaq meltdown. At one point I had a $125K taxable brokerage account. It literally dwindled down  about 80%. I'm still applying my capital loss carryover on taxes (you are limited to $3K deduction per year; of course, the feds and the states got their full, immediate share during the late 90's. That brokerage account became a rainy day account during the Great Recession and was liquidated years back.

I have to admit there was a time when my ego was bruised, seeing that my little brother, then a well-paid chemical engineer at Mobil, owned a house in Beaumont and enjoying regular Club Med vacations while I was bouncing $15 checks in Houston. (He never understood why I, with 2 math degrees, never pursued a more lucrative engineering career; the short answer is I had considered it while I was teaching at the Navy Nuclear School after my UT Master's.  (Hr's currently building his retirement home in Texas, and I think by the time he retires, he may be eligible for two corporate pensions.)  But really, I don't envy other people. The way I look at it is I may not drive a Cadillac, Mercedes or BMW, but I have a decent, comfortable car; I may not eat out very often, but I'm over 70 pounds overweight,

So, going back to the successful 23-year-old Latino described above, I wish him well. He works hard for his money. In fact, my paternal uncle by marriage, a Canuck immigrant, had been a phenomenally successful auto mechanic who was also freelancing on other cars at home. I think he had also started to invest in real estate properties. But he had died fairly young of a heart attack while working on a car (I think before I turned 18 and I was older than my 2 cousins), and my widowed aunt passed just a few years later. He had plenty of life insurance, etc., and my cousins both went to Providence College (although neither was able to find a teaching job with their degrees). Somehow my cousins came under the influence of Pentecostals. (My first girlfriend at OLL also left to join some Pentecostal commune in the Dallas area, so let's just say I don't like Pentecostals.) I was particularly close to Jackie (the older cousin); she would later insist on being called "Jacquie", a more Franco variation. Among other things, Jackie, a decent vocalist, fronted a trio that did gigs like weddings, doing soft rock covers, like The Carpenters' hits. As any familiar reader knows I can be blunt (it's gotten me in trouble on Twitter), and Jacquie didn't like my warnings about the Pentecostals; I never heard from her again. Long story short, my cousins cut themselves off from the family, and the rumor is the Pentecostals had stripped them dry of their inheritances. .Jackie suffered from mental illness and reportedly passed several years back. My younger cousin at last note was working for the Social Security Administration. Despite my late uncle's material success, his daughters never got past being orphaned by their late teens; I remember Jackie attending my maternal grandfather's funeral (around the time I was finishing my UT Master's at 21) and telling me, "There! Now you know what it feels like!" I have no idea what that was about; I never said anything unkind about her folks. I still remember Uncle Pitou; he had dentures and used to manipulate them to the amusement of us young kids.

I have to be candid as an amateur investor for my retirement: I have little appetite for the extraordinary volatility in the market over the last several weeks. I'm not happy with almost daily Trump tweets roiling markets, unnecessary trade wars, unsustainable deficits, debt, and unfunded liabilities, constant warmongering threats (e.g., to Iran), bond yields are shrinking, stocks seem to be richly valued, the rest of the world seems to be struggling, including the Chinese economy. You can go to almost any financial page and see dire warnings, e.g., of comparisons to the lead up to the 2007-8 Great Recession. Gold bugs are coming out of the woodwork, hyping massive deficits, global trade tensions, the Fed cutting rates, tensions over Iran and Saudi Arabia, etc.

So apparently the Managerial Finance MBA course I aced at UH hasn't made me a financial guru, or I might have retired at 50, like my first brother-in-law aspired to do. Now I'm not providing a blueprint of specific advice, but I do have some general tips:

  • Be very wary of  fad investments. One classic example are marijuana-based securities. It's not so much I've never been a consumer or advocate. In part, the federal government's adversarial position creates economic uncertainty. Plus, any of the Big Tobacco producers would be capable of destabilizing the industry with its own entry, never mind buying their way into market leadership. I just think that the small investor is likely to get hurt.
  • I don't really follow or recommend any financial newsletters.  Yes, I do read some premium content but I almost never act on recommendations. I almost always subject recommendations to a variety of technical analyses. I won't chase a stock that's overbought or yields on dividend stocks. Don't catch a falling knife. A perfect example of something that interests me is Boeing. It's a world-class company, and at some point I'll likely take a position in it. But I see it as dead money over the short term. 
  • Avoid big positions and single companies/securities. I only own one individual company security right now, a former employer. I know it very well. But I'm limiting my position and follow the company's news. I am not married to the stock; there are a variety of reasons and heuristics on when to sell. A big one for me is: would I invest in the company with fresh money today, if I had no current position?
  • Cut your losses early. Yes, I'm aware of the fact some stocks do turnaround (eventually). A classic example is IBM in the early 90's before the reign of the Cookie Man. I remember I bought in after a big drop to about $89/share. I caught the falling knife; it must have gone down to the mid-40's, and I remember one analyst saying it should drop down to $29. Long story short, the Cookie Man's prescription worked and I eventually sold at something like $146/share (it rose from there, but I booked a nice profit. But keep in mind these are the exceptions, not the rule. Today, for instance, I cut 3 modest positions (< 5% loss). There wasn't for any specific reason; it just seemed to be dead money; they weren't acting well on good days on Wall Street.
  • Consider closed-ended funds. I've become less of a fan of ETFs, because of the these investments include dead money issues in their target market. This doesn't mean that actively-managed mutual funds do that much better--or even as well. But you can often find closed-ended funds selling at a discount to the value of underlying securities. Several weeks back I sold my position in one technology fund when I found it was now selling at a double-digit premium to underlying shares (plus I was concerned about an oversized position in technology issues).
  • Consider more balance to your portfolio. With bonds, it's not just yield but capital gains. One analyst noted that boring US bonds had gained in price (vs. yield), enabling over a 20% gain year-to-date. Real estate and precious metals (gold et al.) can also balance against the moves of the stock market. Just a warning here: almost every time I've nibbled at precious metals, it's almost as if holders see my transactions and think it's an indicator to sell. I've almost always had to book a loss. Not big losses, but losses nonetheless. 
At the current time, it looks like technology seems to be struggling; there has been discussion about investors shifting from growth to value stocks; my positions in utilities seem to be doing well, relatively speaking. There are a number of investment advisories beating the drums for equities, taking a contrarian attitude towards the wall of worry and pointing out that stocks do well  when bond yields shrink.

As always, I'm not a professional financial adviser. Invest at your own risk. 

BEB Update

I've been doing periodic updates of my former UH doctoral student office mate, Bruce Breeding since he suffered multiple strokes, including a massive one in early June.

Well, spouse Susan reports from Dallas/Irving (I once lived in Irving) where Bruce is going to more intense, advanced rehabilitation. than his prior facility in south Austin. Susan mentioned in passing so far Blue Cross has paid some $1.2M on Bruce's medical and rehabilitation expenses. She also mentioned that Bruce's work-related insurance would expire next month. I'm not sure where they go from there: COBRA or Medicare?

Bruce continues to exceed expectations, now being able to stand to a walker from his wheelchair for up to 10 minutes.  He has had a persistent issue with tolerating liquid nutrition (not on a regular diet yet). His mind is sharp but there are some gaps. He communicates well with others, but he is still frustrated with the limitations of his condition. Susan continues to ask for prayers on Bruce's behalf.



Thursday, September 19, 2019

Post #4266 M: Vaping Prohibition is NOT a "Solution"; New FreedomToon

Quote of the Day

The final test of a leader is that he leaves behind him 
in other men the conviction and will to carry on. 
Walter J. Lippmann  

Government Prohibition of E-Cigarettes Makes the Problem Worse



McClanahan Bashes Another Anti-South Leftist



Choose Life









Political Cartoon



Musical Interlude: My Favorite Vocalists

George Michael, "Monkey". Third consecutive #1.

Wednesday, September 18, 2019

Post #4265 M: Kill the Ex-Im Bank; DEAD WRONG: A Racial Divide

Quote of the Day

Things don't go wrong and break your heart so you can become bitter and give up. 
They happen to break you down and build you up 
so you can be all that you were intended to be.
Samuel Johnson 

Kill the Ex-Im Bank!



DEAD WRONG: A Racial Divide



The 1619 Project Lie and Socialism in America



Choose Life

I'm very wary of embedding semi-tragic videos, like a woman who experiences a miscarriage shortly thereafter. Given the rainbow pregnancy, I double-checked her channel and found the follow-up clip below.









Political Cartoon

Courtesy of Mike Lester via Townhall


Musical Interlude: My Favorite Vocalists

George Michael, "One More Try". His second straight #1.

Tuesday, September 17, 2019

Post #4264 M: Stossel on Life; Trump Impeachment?; Ron Paul on Threats to Iran

Quote of the Day

What's the earth With all its art, verse, music, worth - 
Compared with love, found, gained, and kept?
Robert Browning  

Stossel: Life is Getting Better



Trump Impeachment?



Ron Paul on Trump Administration Threats To Iran



Choose Life









Political Cartoon

Courtesy of Henry Payne via Townhall


Musical Interlude: My Favorite Vocalists

George Michael, "Father Figure". Probably my favorite George Michael song/arrangement

Monday, September 16, 2019

Post #4263 M: The Tragedy of Single-Parent Black Households; Kibbe on Venezuela

Quote of the Day

Every trial endured and weathered in the right spirit makes a soul nobler and stronger than it was before. 
James Buckham  

My Greatest Hits: Sept. 2019

My readership hits continue to suck, barely reaching double-digits (not posts, but total blog hits) over the weekend. This month is unusual in the sense that the top 5 posts are all miscellany/daily posts versus my specialty formats. I suspect this involves unusually high number of foreign hits; moreover, not one is from the past 3 weeks.

The Tragedy of Single-Parent Black Households



Kibbe on Venezuela



Ron Paul on Trump's Lock and Loaded re: Iran



Choose Life









Political Cartoon

Courtesy of AF Branco via Townhall


Musical Interlude: My Favorite Vocalists

George Michael, "Faith". His first solo #1.