Change your thoughts, and you change your world.
Norman Vincent Peale
Tweet of the Day
Who will win the Left-Fascist Party's nomination? pic.twitter.com/cNlXtvtecB— Ronald Guillemette (@raguillem) February 19, 2016
That burn you feel is from the money out of your pocket, legally plundered by an economic nationalist. 1930's retro. pic.twitter.com/rhhO2lmsnp— Ronald Guillemette (@raguillem) February 19, 2016
Trump was for the second Iraq war before he was against it, according to a 2002 Howard Stern interview: the first one didn't get job done.— Ronald Guillemette (@raguillem) February 19, 2016
I'm getting a little tired of Trump's excuses. He wasn't a politician when he flip-flopped on Iraq.The guy won 2 Reform Party 2000 primaries— Ronald Guillemette (@raguillem) February 19, 2016
Talk odd couples. In 2000 Trump attacked Pat Buchanan as a Hitler lover who hates the blacks and gays. Buchanan calls Trump the GOP's future— Ronald Guillemette (@raguillem) February 19, 2016
New NBC/WSJ poll shows Trump's lead down to 5 points, near the margin of error, on the eve of the SC GOP primary. Iowa upset redux?— Ronald Guillemette (@raguillem) February 19, 2016
Kudos to the Institute for Justice for getting the IRS to return nearly $154K seized from a NC convenience store owner under structuring law— Ronald Guillemette (@raguillem) February 19, 2016
Structuring laws involve reporting of $10K transactions, which may be related to criminal proceeds. IRS checks deposits working around $10K.— Ronald Guillemette (@raguillem) February 19, 2016
The issue is some businesses may deposit near $10K amounts legitimately. The IRS agreed to modify its seizure policy, too late for NC owner— Ronald Guillemette (@raguillem) February 19, 2016
The Justice Department is lawlessly trying to intimidate Apple into providing the FBI tools that don't exist so they can hack into iPhones.— Ronald Guillemette (@raguillem) February 19, 2016
Trump is calling for a boycott of Apple based on an FBI demand for anti-privacy tools which is unlawful. I'm calling for a boycott of Trump.— Ronald Guillemette (@raguillem) February 19, 2016
Apple is one of the few success stories of American companies doing business in China. Revenues have nearly doubled there. Trump is against.— Ronald Guillemette (@raguillem) February 19, 2016
The Vatican back in September pledged to host a Syrian refugee family for both of its parishes.There are more than 70,000 parishes in Europe— Ronald Guillemette (@raguillem) February 19, 2016
Let's see the Christian-in-Name-Only Trump put up Syrian refugee families in each of his many properties.— Ronald Guillemette (@raguillem) February 19, 2016
Is Trump going to continue to bash American companies like Ford, Carrier, Nabisco, and Apple for making decisions like he did for his merch?— Ronald Guillemette (@raguillem) February 19, 2016
Tomorrow's SC primary ballot may be the last I ever cast as a registered Republican. If the party nominates Trump, I'm done with the GOP.— Ronald Guillemette (@raguillem) February 19, 2016
"What I think you ought to do is boycott Apple until such time they give that security number"-Trump. THERE IS NO MASTER KEY, IDIOT!— Ronald Guillemette (@raguillem) February 19, 2016
You would think Trump and Cruz have techies on their staff to explain this stuff. The OS tries to prevent hacks like the FBI wants to do.— Ronald Guillemette (@raguillem) February 19, 2016
If the terrorist herself forgot her own password, Apple couldn't have helped her. I believe that the OS limits the owner to 10 guesses.— Ronald Guillemette (@raguillem) February 19, 2016
Do you honestly believe that Apple could sell an iPhone in another country if foreign customers knew the US govt could hack into the phones?— Ronald Guillemette (@raguillem) February 19, 2016
I believe you can reset a disabled iPhone, but you lose all the data stored on it--which obviously the FBI doesn't want to do.— Ronald Guillemette (@raguillem) February 19, 2016
What the FBI wants is a version of the OS which is hackable by brute force methods, so it can automate attempts of every possible password.— Ronald Guillemette (@raguillem) February 20, 2016
There is no commercial market for a smartphone operating system that is easily hacked by criminals. There are laws against hacking.— Ronald Guillemette (@raguillem) February 20, 2016
The Trump campaign and others yesterday slapped back at Pope Francis' criticism of Christians building walls, arguing Vatican hypocrisy.— Ronald Guillemette (@raguillem) February 20, 2016
I posted a response tweet to Crowder yesterday. In fact, as the Gray Lady pointed out, there are no walls along the Vatican City perimeter.— Ronald Guillemette (@raguillem) February 20, 2016
Sweatshops: A Pathway Out of PovertyMark Perry of Carpe Diem points out that Seattle's radical minimum wage rate hike has been counterproductive. pic.twitter.com/jEFTEzojb8— Ronald Guillemette (@raguillem) February 20, 2016
Guest Post Comments: Pope says anybody who builds a wall is not a Christian
Okay, now you're officially retarded. There is no wall around the Vatican, you anti-Catholic trolls. I don't think I can post images here, but there's an address I used to debunk Crowder's similar bullshit in a tweet I published yesterday: https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Cbh7EmJWwAAoqo1.jpg:large
follow-up comment
The editor, even when he quotes a Gray Lady piece (and the Gray Lady is not exactly pro-Catholic) says in its title that "some point wrongly to Vatican walls", still tries to save face. Wrong, buster!
You didn't exactly point out, did you, that the article specifically points out there are no walls built around the perimeter of Vatican City? You don't even know if you're in Italy or Vatican City for all practical purposes. There are some walls from centuries back on the property for defensive purposes, but these were common at cities of the period. Others serve a mostly symbolic purpose. The bottom line is the campus is open to the public. Yes, there is some security for obvious reasons, e.g, the Swiss Guard, but they go on to explain you can gain access to many secured areas with as little as a library card. The point is, you don't need a passport or papers to enter the city. The article even points out the white line I posted reference to in my earlier comment.
The bottom line is the New York Times debunked the Trump campaign's transparent attempt to call the Pope a hypocrite, and now all you Trump cultists are trying to save face.
Okay, I've Watched All the GOP Debates and Don't Recall This
Cruz Tries To Sing
Rev. Sirico On Trump v. Pope Francis
Facebook Corner
(Catholic Libertarians). Thoughts? The statement was: "A person who thinks only about building walls, wherever they may be, and not building bridges, is not Christian."
I don't agree with Pope Francis on economics, but here he is spot on. The right to migrate is a fundamental aspect of liberty, and Jesus references it in several places even if you somehow ignore the fact that His whole ministry was spent traveling between towns in Israel.The Good Samaritan and Jesus' directive to go and preach the Good News to all make that clear; most of the apostles died away from Israel.
I tried reading through the comments of others but got pissed off, because most of the people whose comments I read are not libertarian. So help me if I read one more idiot talk about welfare systems--what retards! Seriously. With some dark exceptions, like the Chinese Exclusion Act, until WWI, this country practiced virtually open immigration. Immigrants helped us build the greatest economy in the world by the end of the nineteenth century--and there was no welfare system as we know it. There were charitable efforts in the private sector to help newcomers.
The fact of the matter is that the reason we had an unauthorized immigrant problem is because we had abandoned the bracero guest worker program by 1964 under special interest union pressure. As for the libertarians in name only, you sure the hell don't have any right to tell me who I can hire from anywhere in the world, and you can't tell me who I can sell a house to. Immigration restrictions are morally corrupt, pure and simple. Your attempts to control what other people can do ends with your property line.
(Reason). The death of Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia shocked Ted Cruz into a sudden realization: It's even more important than before that Ted Cruz be our next president.
This is a fairly obnoxious op-ed. In fact, if he weren't running for President, Ted Cruz would be one of my top picks to fill the Scalia seat; he was one of the longest serving Solicitor Generals in the history of Texas; he has presented at least 8 cases before SCOTUS, winning several, and he clerked under Chief Justice Rehnquist.
Chief Justice Roberts' bizarre decision upholding ObamaCare under the tax power of Congress is out of the mainstream, and Cruz has every right to blast that decision, as did Scalia. Overall, Justice Roberts has been a good jurist, but the ObamaCare decision, WHICH NO LIBERTARIAN SUPPORTS, is a whopper which will stain Roberts' legacy.
The bottom line is that Ted Cruz has a first-rate legal mind, has experience presenting in SCOTUS, and there is no one on either side of the aisle better qualified to name a replacement. As to his rhetoric, keep in mind that he is running in a Presidential campaign and is trying to appeal to the social conservative base of the party.
Recent 2016 Presidential Endorsements
Political Cartoon
Courtesy of Steve Breen via Townhall |
Laura Branigan, "The Power of Love". One of my favorite songs: Jennifer Rush's original version is awesome. I didn't realize Air Supply did a male version; I love the ending with the gospel choir backing. This marks the end of my Branigan retrospective; I'll start my Stevie Wonder series with my next daily post.