The grand aim of all science is to cover
the greatest number of empirical facts
by logical deduction
from the smallest number of hypotheses or axioms.
Albert Einstein
Tweet of the Day
It's long overdue for major league baseball to induct two of the greatest hitters into its Hall of Fame: Shoeless Joe Jackson and Pete Rose.
— Ronald Guillemette (@raguillem) December 15, 2015
@realDonaldTrump's idea of job growth is caddies working for tips on one of his golf courses.
— Ronald Guillemette (@raguillem) December 15, 2015
Hillary Clinton worries about security breaches, like who revealed she had two top secret emails on her home server. https://t.co/ripcF3PZD1
— Ronald Guillemette (@raguillem) December 16, 2015
“We’ve got to do everything we can to weed out hate and plant love and kindness."-H. Clinton. Like drone strikes targeting 41, killing 1147.
— Ronald Guillemette (@raguillem) December 16, 2015
California is going to keep innovating, keep regulating, keep taxing.-Jerry Brown. Mutually inconsistent policies. https://t.co/ZBpKIO1rQv
— Ronald Guillemette (@raguillem) December 16, 2015
Ever notice how self-serving Big Green crony capitalists like Bloom Energy CEO K.R. Sridhar are arguing evey other business is also corrupt?
— Ronald Guillemette (@raguillem) December 16, 2015
It's painful to see former HP CEO Fiorina sidestep a debate question on government mandating a crippling backdoor to encryption software.NO!
— Ronald Guillemette (@raguillem) December 16, 2015
Ben Carson noticed the emperor has no clothes: it's hubris to believe that US meddling in the Mideast can resolve millennia of conflicts.
— Ronald Guillemette (@raguillem) December 16, 2015
Jeb Bush is right: @realDonaldTrump is a chaos candidate. His positions change depending on the analysis of what shit sticks to the wall.
— Ronald Guillemette (@raguillem) December 16, 2015
Best line of the debate: Ted Cruz said that he would finish building the wall and get @realDonaldTrump, not Mexico, to pay for it.
— Ronald Guillemette (@raguillem) December 16, 2015
Pausing refugee migration until we resolve security issues is like saying women shouldn't get pregnant until we solve the problem of evil.
— Ronald Guillemette (@raguillem) December 16, 2015
Rand Paul did the best job positioning himself as the most consistent fiscal conservative. Christie and others complained about sequester.
— Ronald Guillemette (@raguillem) December 16, 2015
Trump blew this debate, as well as all the others. Everything out of his mouth was political spin; he has zero patience for debating policy.
— Ronald Guillemette (@raguillem) December 16, 2015
It did seem Trump was rattled by the audience reactions and the more aggressive shots by other candidates. His media bashing is getting old.
— Ronald Guillemette (@raguillem) December 16, 2015
@realDonaldTrump's response to Jeb Bush, belittling his poll numbers, was audacious for someone who constantly loses to Hillary Clinton.
— Ronald Guillemette (@raguillem) December 16, 2015
Fiorina suggested the government should ask software developers to disable encryption software, as if to ask for a master key to any house.
— Ronald Guillemette (@raguillem) December 16, 2015
Image of the DayMy Greatest Hits: Dec. 2015
- Miscellany: 12/11/15
- Miscellany: 10/25/15
- Miscellany: 11/28/15
- Miscellany: 11/26/15 Happy Thanksgiving
- Miscellany: 12/04/15
The bifurcation of Iowa caucus results continues (remember the earlier duel between Trump and Carson trading trading leads?), today the PPP having Trump 3 over Cruz and the Loras College having Cruz at 30, 7 over Trump. The Loras poll is the second recent poll putting Cruz in the 30's, in fact over the past month Cruz has been at 20 or better, remarkable considering 2 months ago Cruz was struggling to reach double digits.
The latest national ABC poll has Trump at 38, once again lapping the competition and more; Cruz was at 15 and Rubio and Carson tied for third at 12 each. I'm still struck by the bifurgated clusters of Trump at 27 vs. 40.
I did watch the GOP debate tonight as my later tweets above reference. In many ways, this was the best, most entertaining debate although to a large extent there wasn't a lot to differentiate among the generally interventionist, Big Defense, anti-immigrant, anti-Obama/Clinton perspectives. I've got a couple of one-off posts in process, one of them on the debate, which I hope to publish this week.
Libertarian Squabbles: Reflections on a Prior FB Exchange
There are various squabbles among libertarians on a lot of issues--abortion, immigration, ancaps vs. minarchists, intellectual property, etc. (There are dominant positions, of course, and I, e.g., as a pro-lifer, am on the minority side.) IP, for example, is a big debate; I understand that libertarians may not be happy with the chilling effect of IP enforcement on independent discoveries and innovation. I happen to be a supporter of IP rights, although I think reforms should be considered. Why am I discussing IP? I belong to an invitation-only FB group in favor of IP. There are a couple of name libertarians who supported IP rights: Lysander Spooner (a prominent abolitionist and one who also attempted to test the USPS monopoly) and Ayn Rand. Ayn Rand, noted for novels like The Fountainhead and Atlas Shrugged, in particular promoted her own philosophic system, called Objectivism. I'm not going to discuss Objectivism in detail here (I'm not an Objectivist, although there are a lot of her pro-capitalist insights I share), except to note that it is explicitly atheist.
I have had a lot of libertarians shoot back at me, most of which I don't publish in my relevant FB Corner segment. For example, AnCaps love to mock minarchists on a slippery slope to authoritarianism. The Pauls and their followers think open borders is inconsistent with private property rights. I've had my share of spats with Jeffrey Tucker and others on IP rights.
Now just to provide the setting, I am used to challenges from Catholic progressives who remake Christ into some meek, humanist, socialist preacher, which I find totally disingenuous. Lawrence Reed of FEE published a relevant critique, and I've written a one-off post and multiple FB exchange on related issues. I've occasionally seen atheists post mocking comments in these threads, re: sky daddy or the like. I don't have a problem with atheists expressing their point of view; what I find irritating is the juvenile dismissive tone.
So over the weekend the We Are Capitalist FB group published a FEE-like thread on the Jesus being a socialist theme. In hindsight, I should have probably inferred this one commenter was an Objectivist; he specifically suggested that he favored WAC's perspective on most issues, and he used the term 'altruist' which is a big construct in Objectivism. At the time, my immediate reaction was to take the author's 'altruist' as yet another "progressive" Christian reducing Jesus to a do-gooder humanist/teacher, stripped of religious significance; he didn't use the typically dismissive language I've seen from atheists. But, in Objectivist circles, altruism is considered morally defective; at the risk of oversimplification, a man should pursue his own best interests in place of suboptimizing incoherent principles.
The troll was so incensed by my response, he tried to message me directly vs. respond in the thread. (I don't always go back to the original thread to look for responses; some FB replies spawn an email notification but not others). It's possible he did respond to the thread, but all I saw was his message, and FB noted that he was in the same pro-IP FB group. The message made it clear that he considered calling Jesus an altruist was not intended to be a compliment.
I didn't respond back, because I know there was nothing I could do or say that was going to convert a committed atheist or vice-versa.
Political Cartoon
Courtesy of Henry Payne via Townhall |
Zooey Deschanel & Leon Redbone, "Baby, It's Cold Outside"