I always advise young people to dream small dreams,
because small dreams can be achieved, and
once you achieve a small dream and a small success,
it gives you confidence to go on to the next big step.
John H. Johnson
I don't often discuss my QOTD. I don't even know if readers pay attention to the feature. I'm fairly big on quotations and have been for years. In my practical computing blog, I describe a utility that I use to insert a random quote from a text file in my Thunderbird emails. A few years back, a recruiter was so impressed with my quotations she asked for my source file. (She never found me a gig, but she liked the quotes in our exchanges.)
There are numerous examples for the current quote. One thing was in youth baseball; I was a reasonably aggressive hitter in practice but tightened up during games. My coach was riding me one day about not taking enough cuts at the plate, and to my surprise I made contact: it was a sickly looking soft line drive to left field, but a base hit in anyone's park. It was just what my confidence needed. My next time up I hit a sharp ground ball up the middle; the shortstop made a hell of a play spearing it, but I beat his throw to first. My last at bat in youth baseball (my high school didn't field a baseball team) I kept fouling off on a two-strike count with 2 out; I finally took a pitch outside, and a teammate got caught trying to steal, ending the game and our season. (I should note I'm fairly unusual; I'm a lefty, but I can throw with either arm and usually throw a football with my right. I can switch hit but normally bat right. My coaches flirted with the idea of making me a pitcher; I have a natural sidearm motion and can throw it hard, but he wanted me to throw over the top; I'm not sure why, but he quickly ditched the idea before I even threw batting practice. Too bad; for some reason, batters, including my little brother, seemed to have problems hitting off my sidearm. My most unusual game--playing all 3 outfield positions and first base.)
A more compelling example was doing original research. In a certain sense, I was intimidated with the idea. It would have been far easier for me to have worked on some offshoot from a senior professor's established research program. None of my UH professors seemed interested in using me as a research assistant. Moreover, I was interested in human factors research, which at that point was a narrow niche in my discipline. My chair was more of a life coach and editor; he didn't micromanage the process. I learned by doing. I read literally thousands of other research papers; I ordered copies of dissertations. But by the end, I KNEW how to do original research. I offered to put his name on my early related papers, but he refused to take credit for my work. I no longer had a problem coming up with a research agenda; I was literally working on up to a dozen articles at the same time. I could easily come up with more but there's only so much time in a day. God knows what I could have done in a place where researchers were open to joint projects, which I never had during my brief career in academia.
Tweet of the Day
13yo Houston student Danesiah Neal got into trouble trying to buy chicken nuggets at school with a (legit) $2 bill.Now a $3 bill with Trump?— Ronald Guillemette (@raguillem) May 10, 2016
I don't carry cash anymore except for things like road tolls. I recently got a $2 bill in change. Retard Houston police: check US Treasury.— Ronald Guillemette (@raguillem) May 10, 2016
Don't police have better things to do than terrorize a 13yo girl because idiot school administrators can't read? https://t.co/A9l98Pch6N— Ronald Guillemette (@raguillem) May 10, 2016
Trivia: who's on the $2 bill? Democrats won't know: it's Jefferson. The founder of their party who believed in a limited federal government.— Ronald Guillemette (@raguillem) May 10, 2016
Besides the fact that the young girl wasn't able to eat lunch because of the school's refusal to accept payment,what's with serving nuggets?— Ronald Guillemette (@raguillem) May 10, 2016
I have a goddaughter who eats chicken anything. I don't do nuggets: EVER. I once introduced Indian co-workers to the wonder of Boston Market— Ronald Guillemette (@raguillem) May 10, 2016
If I ever meet left-fascist DeBlasio for lunch, it'll be at Chick-Fil-A. The bread carbs are a little high, but tasty.Good folks run company— Ronald Guillemette (@raguillem) May 10, 2016
Pat "I Lose" Buchanan has joined Sarah "I Quit" Palin in the Wacko Trump Brigade vendetta against Paul Ryan. Who is Ryan? The House Speaker.— Ronald Guillemette (@raguillem) May 10, 2016
Pat "I Lose" Buchanan has joined Sarah "I Quit" Palin in the Wacko Trump Brigade vendetta against Paul Ryan. Who is Ryan? The House Speaker.— Ronald Guillemette (@raguillem) May 10, 2016
Trump is a pompous asshole who has not spent a minute in the private sector. What qualifies him to be President? Being a reality TV star?— Ronald Guillemette (@raguillem) May 10, 2016
Paul Ryan and Mitch McConnell have every reason to stand up to Trump, who only won 40% of the GOP voters and has ZERO substance on policy.— Ronald Guillemette (@raguillem) May 10, 2016
Polls suggest that with Trump heading the ticket, the GOP will lose the Senate and likely several seats in the House. The Congress 1/3 govt.— Ronald Guillemette (@raguillem) May 10, 2016
Ryan is a big boy and doesn't need my help. But I have no problem with getting in the faces of Buchanan, Palin, Giuliani, Hannity, cultists.— Ronald Guillemette (@raguillem) May 10, 2016
Guess what, losers? Trump claims to be the guru of "the art of the deal". If Trump can't make a deal with GOP leaders in Congress, it's BS.— Ronald Guillemette (@raguillem) May 10, 2016
You negotiate, idiot cultists; that means win-win, the result of any good negotiation. Ryan did NOT rule out a deal; he said no deal YET.— Ronald Guillemette (@raguillem) May 10, 2016
Ryan already said he was ready to step aside from his role as convention chair. Trump needs to stop having self-defeating Trumpertantrums— Ronald Guillemette (@raguillem) May 10, 2016
This is already shaping up to be the most divisive GOP convention since 1976. The last thing Trump needs is a fight with the House Speaker.— Ronald Guillemette (@raguillem) May 10, 2016
I'm boycotting the GOP convention for the first time in my adult life. And I was a Democrat for part of that. I am not alone.Trump is crazy.— Ronald Guillemette (@raguillem) May 10, 2016
I think I've tweeted about Hiroshima in the past. A stumbling block was the status of the Japanese emperor, whether he would be prosecuted.— Ronald Guillemette (@raguillem) May 10, 2016
The American insistence on unconditional surrender meant no deal on Hirohito. And in the end the US let the Japanese keep their emperor.— Ronald Guillemette (@raguillem) May 10, 2016
Trump is trusting his VP search committee to the same jerk who manhandled Michelle Fields. Yeah, this is going to end well. No to Oprah!— Ronald Guillemette (@raguillem) May 10, 2016
Interesting. It looks like some polling has tightened up since Trump became the presumptive GOP nominee. This is your honeymoon, Trump.— Ronald Guillemette (@raguillem) May 10, 2016
Honeymoons won't last forever. Clinton is about 155 delegates away with 1083 still available. With proportional delegate rules, it's a lock.— Ronald Guillemette (@raguillem) May 10, 2016
However, tightening polling does suggest that Clinton is going to have to do more than be dismissive of the Trump candidacy. She's unpopular— Ronald Guillemette (@raguillem) May 10, 2016
Prager points out that the reason #NeverTrump never really stopped him from capturing the nomination is because supporters not conservative— Ronald Guillemette (@raguillem) May 10, 2016
Oh, yes, the alt-right type, the one issue anti-immigrants are a vocal part of Trump's base. But look where Trump won his majorities: NE.— Ronald Guillemette (@raguillem) May 10, 2016
Some may argue Indiana (53%), but by that time Cruz had been eliminated from a first-ballot nomination. Trump had won neighboring IL and MI.— Ronald Guillemette (@raguillem) May 10, 2016
The Northeast/mid-Atlantic has always been a bastion of liberal Republicanism.They are more a fiscally conservative twist on welfare state.— Ronald Guillemette (@raguillem) May 10, 2016
I have to catch myself when I say things like "liberal Republicanism". There's nothing liberal about taking other people's stuff.— Ronald Guillemette (@raguillem) May 10, 2016
If you look at the polling, immigration usually last the last issue voters ranked. Other things like the war on terror or the federal budget— Ronald Guillemette (@raguillem) May 10, 2016
Now I do think that Trump got a YUGE percentage of the vocal anti-immigrant faction. You have to go beyond that to explain Trump's success.— Ronald Guillemette (@raguillem) May 10, 2016
It's embarrassing how much Trump retreads his old bullshit ideas, like the wealth tax. He's emulating Warren Buffett's soak the rich BS.— Ronald Guillemette (@raguillem) May 10, 2016
It's like Pope Buffett or Pope Trump allow you to lust other people's wealth, because they stand in moral judgment of other rich people.— Ronald Guillemette (@raguillem) May 10, 2016
No, if Buffett or Trump think they aren't paying enough for spendthrift govt, let them pay more than they have to; the Treasury will take it— Ronald Guillemette (@raguillem) May 10, 2016
It's like if Warren Buffett called up your plumber and gave his permission to double your charges because you can afford it. MYOB, jerk.— Ronald Guillemette (@raguillem) May 10, 2016
Going back to Trump's success, in part, this involved the fact that he only needed enough of the conservative vote to fragment opposition— Ronald Guillemette (@raguillem) May 10, 2016
I still haven't understood why Trump did as well as he did among evangelicals, which should have been Cruz' constituency. Maybe social pgms?— Ronald Guillemette (@raguillem) May 10, 2016
But for me is the puzzle is why Trump did dominate the non-conservative vote. In theory, Kasich and Bush should have done better with them.— Ronald Guillemette (@raguillem) May 10, 2016
It may have been that Trump avoided tough issues like social spending cuts.Or that they gullibly believe that Trump is a fiscal conservative— Ronald Guillemette (@raguillem) May 10, 2016
In the case of Kasich, his mishandling of SB5 may be a contributing factor; unions in the referendum did fearmongering over public safety.— Ronald Guillemette (@raguillem) May 10, 2016
In short, the unions adapted the Paul Ryan throwing Granny off the cliff tactic (which is why Scott Walker approached it differently).— Ronald Guillemette (@raguillem) May 10, 2016
It may simply be something stupid like they're fed up with politicians and thought, "What the hell; a fresh face is what we need." Insane.— Ronald Guillemette (@raguillem) May 10, 2016
I doubt I'll ever get the Trump phenomenon. He comes across to me like a sleazy late night pitchman.Thin-skinned, vain, unprincipled.— Ronald Guillemette (@raguillem) May 10, 2016
Trump makes grandiose promises he can't keep, including his signature wall. Oh, he'll tell you "Yes, we can". No, he can't. Congress, em dom— Ronald Guillemette (@raguillem) May 10, 2016
Trump is saying all sorts of things he can't deliver on because the Presidency has no such powers. He can't dictate to the Congress.— Ronald Guillemette (@raguillem) May 10, 2016
Obama will be the first to tell you he's been stymied since 2010 when the GOP retook Congress. He made a huge political blunder on ObamaCare— Ronald Guillemette (@raguillem) May 10, 2016
Obama's annual budget is a joke, DOA.He has faced opposition each step of the way trying to expand spending.He is left with executive orders— Ronald Guillemette (@raguillem) May 10, 2016
Well, it looks like Trump is getting about 2/3 of the votes in West Virginia; running against himself. I'm "impressed"— Ronald Guillemette (@raguillem) May 11, 2016
Ted Cruz seemed to suggest that if he won Nebraska today, he might get back in. Well, Election Betting Odds showed him the heavy favorite.— Ronald Guillemette (@raguillem) May 11, 2016
But that was then and this is now. The only people voting for Cruz and Kasich in NE are protest voters, currently about 40%.— Ronald Guillemette (@raguillem) May 11, 2016
As I write, Trump is within 130 delegates of mathematically clinching nomination & will likely sweep the remaining 31 WV delegates.— Ronald Guillemette (@raguillem) May 11, 2016
Now Cruz was never going to win WV--Trump's angry white no-college male vote dominates--but Nebraska was a sure thing. Until he withdrew.— Ronald Guillemette (@raguillem) May 11, 2016
I never understood why Cruz withdrew before Trump had the 1237. Huckabee hung on until the end in 2008 as did Ron Paul in 2012.— Ronald Guillemette (@raguillem) May 11, 2016
The latest PPP poll shows Trump losing to used car salesmen (-6), DMV (-10), root canals (-11), traffic jams (-7), jury duty (-22), lice -26— Ronald Guillemette (@raguillem) May 11, 2016
However, PPP still finds Trump more popular than cockroaches (+4) and hemorrhoids (+6). I attribute 1st to his tweet dancing La Cucaracha.— Ronald Guillemette (@raguillem) May 11, 2016
I'm demanding a recount on Trump v. hemorrhoids. I think an argument can be made that Trump is a pain in the ass: what's the difference?— Ronald Guillemette (@raguillem) May 11, 2016
Sanders' hopelessness is seen in the context of his lopsided WV victory over Clinton (expected) but he picked up a net of 4 delegates so far— Ronald Guillemette (@raguillem) May 11, 2016
@realDonaldTrump HAHAHAHAHAHA. You really are retarded, aren't you? Goddamn Luddite.— Ronald Guillemette (@raguillem) May 11, 2016
@Reince You know what's even more embarrassing? Your presumptuous anti-trade nominee is losing to the same socialist by even larger margins.— Ronald Guillemette (@raguillem) May 11, 2016
@bopeep67 @michellemalkin What did her father? Nothing squat beyond his mission, beyond propaganda. No difference, idiot.— Ronald Guillemette (@raguillem) May 11, 2016
@bopeep67 @michellemalkin Walter Trohan, Chicago Tribune.Do a simple Google search; it's online. FDR was offered similar terms before Yalta.— Ronald Guillemette (@raguillem) May 11, 2016
@bopeep67 @michellemalkin There is no doubt that Japanese would have fought over less than an honorable surrender. But war was over.— Ronald Guillemette (@raguillem) May 11, 2016
@bopeep67 @michellemalkin No, you goddamn retard. There are lots of miliary personnel, MacArthur, Eisenhower, records that say otherwise.— Ronald Guillemette (@raguillem) May 11, 2016
@bopeep67 @hippogyn @michellemalkin You believe in the propaganda you've been taught. Japan has limited natural resources; US blockade,bombs— Ronald Guillemette (@raguillem) May 11, 2016
@bopeep67 @michellemalkin How much of a retard are you? FDR slapped economic sanctions on Japan--despite a depression. That's an act of war.— Ronald Guillemette (@raguillem) May 11, 2016
@bopeep67 @michellemalkin Tell me, you goddamn fascist. Did the Axis Powers ever firebomb US population centers? Pearl Harbor was military.— Ronald Guillemette (@raguillem) May 11, 2016
I can't believe that I'm getting trolled over WWII. It really wasn't until a few years back that I began to question what I had been taught.— Ronald Guillemette (@raguillem) May 11, 2016
I read the other day an analysis that compared Trump to Ron Paul:not in politics so much as crazy conspiracy theories like the 9/11 truthers— Ronald Guillemette (@raguillem) May 11, 2016
I tend to be naturally suspicious about conspiracy theories. No, I started second-guessing over things quite objective like internment camps— Ronald Guillemette (@raguillem) May 11, 2016
Take the firebombing of Dresden. A HISTORY website: Dresden was neither important to German wartime production nor a major industrial center— Ronald Guillemette (@raguillem) May 11, 2016
"An unknown number of civilians—estimated at somewhere between 35,000 and 135,000–were dead" British/Amerian air force. Feb 13-15, 1945.— Ronald Guillemette (@raguillem) May 11, 2016
I'm not going to argue that the Axis Powers were more honorable. Both sides used incendiary devices targeted at civilian populations.— Ronald Guillemette (@raguillem) May 11, 2016
Firebombing of Tokyo had killed probably killed over 100,000 and left over a million homeless. Operation Starvation: 78% sustenance calories— Ronald Guillemette (@raguillem) May 11, 2016
The relentless, almost uncontested Allied bombing campaign had decimated industry and infrastructure. Japan was near socioeconomic collapse.— Ronald Guillemette (@raguillem) May 11, 2016
The Japanese government already knew by 1944 that the war was lost. They were looking for a face-saving surrender. The Emperor was useful.— Ronald Guillemette (@raguillem) May 11, 2016
All of the pro-war people assume that an unconditional surrender and occupation were necessary. No. The Japanese empire was done.— Ronald Guillemette (@raguillem) May 11, 2016
Moreover, Japan knew as its Axis partners collapsed, it would bear the full brunt of Allied military forces. So pick your poison: US, USSR.— Ronald Guillemette (@raguillem) May 11, 2016
Now why did FDR spurn essentially the same terms of surrender as on V-J Day? Trohan seems to suggest FDR found it politically naive.— Ronald Guillemette (@raguillem) May 11, 2016
But if the two bombs had not really improved terms over what FDR dismissed months earlier, how many casualities on both sides were worth it?— Ronald Guillemette (@raguillem) May 11, 2016
Stossel On the Right To Privacy
Marriage Economics
As a lifelong bachelor (not by conviction: it's more about being a geek and not meeting people), I've wondered how my life would have been different. I remember my first girlfriend, who I met in college; I was 18 (sophomore/junior) and she was 21-22. She was involved with the Catholic Pentecostal network and told me one day that she had been invited to some Dallas area commune. She was looking for some unspecified commitment from me to stay. Internally I was freaking out; I could barely pay my own way through college and didn't even have a car. I loved the girl but I wasn't ready to take on responsibilities of a wife and children.
I do think I've taken risks professionally I wouldn't have taken if I had a family and bills depending on me; I probably would have taken the BGSU offer over UWM for quality of life reasons; I would have avoided academic politics until I got tenure (not that I was looking for trouble, but I would have been more reluctant to speak my mind). I probably would have majored in something more practical, like engineering, rather than pure math and philosophy. Has marital status affected my opportunities? Not sure (recruiters would never admit that); I don't think I would have taken road warrior work with Oracle or moved as much if I had had a family.
Political Cartoon
Courtesy of Ken Catalino via Townhall |
Rod Stewart, "Lost in You"