The sign of intelligent people is their ability to control emotions by the application of reason.
Marya Mannes
Tweet of the Day
#TwiitterWouldBeGreatIf it integrated spellchecking and it had more comprehensive blocking features.— Ronald Guillemette (@raguillem) April 24, 2016
I think the Trump forces underestimate the resolve of those of us in the #NeverTrump camp. If/when Trump clinches the GOP nod, the real war.— Ronald Guillemette (@raguillem) April 24, 2016
If and when the GOP Establishment becomes the Party of Trump & all of those who pay tribute to him, including Cruz or Rubio, we declare war.— Ronald Guillemette (@raguillem) April 24, 2016
Cruz, listen up. Four years from now, after Trump becomes an inkblot in American history, we will remember that you sold out the cause.— Ronald Guillemette (@raguillem) April 24, 2016
Cruz, I don't give a damn you gave your word. That was when you were competing against 12 other real Republicans, not some crony capitalist.— Ronald Guillemette (@raguillem) April 24, 2016
Cruz, you thought you had brass balls when you confronted McConnell and Boehner, but you fold like a cheap suit in the face of Trumpkins?— Ronald Guillemette (@raguillem) April 24, 2016
To avoid misunderstanding, when I speak of declaring war, I mean in a political sense. We will use the media & other nonviolent means.— Ronald Guillemette (@raguillem) April 24, 2016
We are demanding for all real Republicans to boycott/withdraw from the convention if and when Trump clinches the nomination. No endorsements— Ronald Guillemette (@raguillem) April 24, 2016
All of those who enable the Trump hostile takeover of the GOP will pay a political price, and we will primary any SOB endorsing him.— Ronald Guillemette (@raguillem) April 24, 2016
@MarkSKrikorian Yeah, let's maintain an artificial shortage of workers so as to make payback on technology substitutes quicker! Idiot!— Ronald Guillemette (@raguillem) April 24, 2016
@AlexNowrasteh Didn't I read a similar story about jalapeno harvesters in Arizona? https://t.co/VYrl1vyNMa— Ronald Guillemette (@raguillem) April 24, 2016
Nowrasteh commented on an anti-immigrant's mocking reference to robotics used to enhance productivity of aging/disappearing Japanese farmers— Ronald Guillemette (@raguillem) April 24, 2016
The economic theory behind the anti-immigrant's manipulation of the labor market is that farmers need to raise wages to attract new workers.— Ronald Guillemette (@raguillem) April 24, 2016
In fact, Cruz recently made this point in reference to Arizona's immigration policies, which is one of the issues I have with him.— Ronald Guillemette (@raguillem) April 24, 2016
The problem is farmers have to live within a budget, just like fast food franchises. There is a limited pool of labor at a given wage.— Ronald Guillemette (@raguillem) April 24, 2016
So what you end up with is a shortage of workers. This is different from a glut of workers, e.g., unemployed domestic farm workers.— Ronald Guillemette (@raguillem) April 24, 2016
The point those of who believe in liberalized immigration (like Nowasteh and me) is that the Mexican border and state lines are similar.— Ronald Guillemette (@raguillem) April 24, 2016
Who cares if an Arizona farmer hires a state native, a Calfornia or Texas resident? But if the worker lives 10 miles south of the border?— Ronald Guillemette (@raguillem) April 24, 2016
Now in the long term, wages correlate with rising productivity & this is what the Japanese story is about. Robotics can enhance productivity— Ronald Guillemette (@raguillem) April 24, 2016
Part of the issue is the financing of robotic implementation given global market prices for a farmer's commodity crops and current costs.— Ronald Guillemette (@raguillem) April 24, 2016
Of course, there's an autarkic side to this story, i.e., "food security". Japan has limited natural resources, including farmland.— Ronald Guillemette (@raguillem) April 24, 2016
Most of the developed economies, especially Japan, Europe and the US, justify protectionist subsidies and the like to preserve market share.— Ronald Guillemette (@raguillem) April 24, 2016
Under the concept of comparative advantage, I don't see the logic for Japanese protectionism in food production. There are many suppliers.— Ronald Guillemette (@raguillem) April 24, 2016
Of course, I say the same thing for food production in the OECD in general. Kudos to the Cairnes Group and countries like New Zealand.— Ronald Guillemette (@raguillem) April 24, 2016
My personal target #1: Trump enabler Jeff Sessions is up for reelection in 2020. He ran unopposed in 2014.If nobody has the balls, I'll run— Ronald Guillemette (@raguillem) April 24, 2016
As for Chris Christie, we haven't forgotten about you. If you ever file again, I'll be on your ass as fast as a Krispy Kreme doughnut.— Ronald Guillemette (@raguillem) April 24, 2016
Bernie Sanders wants to prohibit tobacco at the same time he wants to decriminalize marijuana. No need for consistency there, Bernie.— Ronald Guillemette (@raguillem) April 24, 2016
I just heard a Cato Institute podcast which explained why Carrier, fascist Trump target, was shifting production to Mexico. It is US policy.— Ronald Guillemette (@raguillem) April 24, 2016
It has to do with protectionist tariffs put on part imports. (Bullshit anti-dumping arguments are made by local producers.) Corrupt govt.— Ronald Guillemette (@raguillem) April 24, 2016
So despite all the bullshit arguments made by economic illiterate Trump, this doesn't have to do about exporting jobs--but thieving govt.— Ronald Guillemette (@raguillem) April 24, 2016
Of course, the corrupt bastard Trump is going to argue for the crony capitalists/unionists demanding sanctions against foreign competition.— Ronald Guillemette (@raguillem) April 24, 2016
Mexico says, "Hey, we're not going to steal from you, Carrier, like the US govt. Come do business with us." Trump can't do squat about it.— Ronald Guillemette (@raguillem) April 24, 2016
The problem with fascist Trump is NAFTA is US law. He can't hit Carrier with a targeted tariff--it's unconstitutional on its face.— Ronald Guillemette (@raguillem) April 24, 2016
Of course, Clinton and Sanders are in the union/anti-trade tank, so they are just as idiotic as their fellow Democrat, Trump.— Ronald Guillemette (@raguillem) April 24, 2016
If Trump wasn't playing this populist, economically ignorant anti-trade crap, he would understand that most imports feed businesses.— Ronald Guillemette (@raguillem) April 24, 2016
You don't win new/expanded businesses with stupid taxes and regulations, enacted by progressives playing winners and losers in the economy.— Ronald Guillemette (@raguillem) April 24, 2016
Oh, I'm sure Trump is pushing his corrupt, pandering, anti-competitive bullshit in Pennsylvania and Indiana, but consumers, he's against you— Ronald Guillemette (@raguillem) April 24, 2016
Wow, if you thought Bernie Sanders was pissed off enough already at Charles Koch, just imagine how he feels about picking Hillary over Trump— Ronald Guillemette (@raguillem) April 24, 2016
Expect Bernie Sanders to add Wichita, KS to Wall Street as he attacks Hillary Clinton.— Ronald Guillemette (@raguillem) April 24, 2016
Who got burned? The taxpayers and people who voted for corrupt left-fascist Sanders. pic.twitter.com/ik0AZeqXLN— Ronald Guillemette (@raguillem) April 25, 2016
Uh-oh. The Trump cultists are upset about the Cruz and Kasich camps double-teaming fascist Trump in the Triple Threat match for the GOP nod.— Ronald Guillemette (@raguillem) April 25, 2016
Image of the DayThis is Soft Rock America. Jim Webb trending,not the songwriter (just an ex-senator). My favorite Jimmy Webb song: https://t.co/OA5LbSaLni— Ronald Guillemette (@raguillem) April 25, 2016
Inspirational
I don't know why I'm so attracted to the cochlear implant activation; maybe it's because Dad had a hearing disability from his Air Force career years on the flightline. It was almost impossible to have a phone conversation, and he went through hearing aids like I used to go through answering machines or weight scales (I've literally bought about 5 over the past 3 years--long story).
Political Cartoon
Courtesy of Eric Allie via IPI |
Courtesy of Dana Summers via Townhall |
Rod Stewart, "The First Cut Is the Deepest". I got introduced to the Cat Stevens classic through this Top 40 remake, although I eventually came across the original and somewhat prefer its more explosive chorus. (There were artists I used to collect every artist release--like ABBA, Gary Wright, the Beatles of course (I actually first bought the red and blue anthologies and then backfilled), ELO, Springsteen (yes, including the boring acoustic albums), and Stevens. For others, it was normally hit retrospectives or the occasional singles if I really liked the song. In Stevens' case, I stumbled upon one of those early years retrospectives with "Matthew & Son" (not crazy about the lyrics, but the arrangement is spectacular).
I stopped collecting artists several years back. I might consider buying a new album from Elton John, Neil Diamond, Madonna, etc., but I would probably preview the songs on Youtube first. I may have bought a copy of Springsteen's "The Rising" but partly because of his abysmal politics, I've basically tuned him out since "Human Touch". My favorite Spingsteen album is "Darkness on the Edge of Town" (with probably the greatest rock track of all time, "Candy's Room"). I don't know in the cases like Dylan and Springsteen if they just peaked too early, because in my view Springsteen never had another "Darkness" in him. I especially found it ironic that his antiwar "Born In the USA" became a patriotically correct anthem in the same way that the Turtles' "Happy Together" became a love song versus the desperate plea of some guy with unrequited love. I guess as an artist you just go with the flow and accept the fact people don't get it. It's just that the musical arrangements didn't fit the lyrics; as an amateur songwriter, I want the listener to focus on the lyrics and the arrangement should dovetail to songwriter intent. In Springsteen's shoes, I probably have written a patriotic song and then sampled it in a more somber arrangement, e.g., as a little boy, I used to dream about the excitement of war, the stirring marches, etc., but in the reality of war, I experienced hell, etc. I've written something of the like in an unpublished, unfinished song, "After the Parade Is Over". Think of how "The Logical Song" starts out.(as a former philosophy major, I just LOVE that song).