Analytics

Friday, May 31, 2019

Post #4126 M: Reason Mocks the 2020 POTUS Race; Ron Paul on Pence and Perpetual Warfare

Quote of the Day

Tis the business of little minds to shrink, 
but he whose heart is firm,
and whose conscience approves his conduct, 
will pursue his principles unto death.
Thomas Paine  

Reason Mocks the 2020 Presidential Race



Ron Paul on Pence and the Perpetual Warfare State



Ron Paul on the China Trade War


Choose Life









Political Cartoon

Courtesy of Gary Varvel via Townhall


Music Interlude: My Favorite Vocalists

Bryan Adams (with Tina Turner), "It's Only Love"

Thursday, May 30, 2019

Post #4125 M: Ron Paul on Assange's Failing Health; FreedomToon on the Electoral College

Quote of the Day

Just remember: when you think all is lost, the future remains.
Bob Goddard  

Ron Paul on Assange's Failing Heath in a British Prison



Trump Declares a Trade War on Mexico


Choose Life









Political Cartoon



Musical Interlude: My Favorite Vocalists

Bryan Adams, "One Night Love Affair"

Wednesday, May 29, 2019

Post #4124 M: No Strawman Argument; Sweden and the Welfare State

Quote of the Day


Free the Straw!



Sweden and the Problem of the Welfare State


Kibbe: Not All Professors Are Socialists



Choose Life








Political Cartoon

Courtesy of Gary Varvel via Townhall


Musical Interlude: My Favorite Vocalists

Bryan Adams, "Heaven'. His first #1 and one of my all-time favorites. I still remember the first time I heard it: a perfect pop song. Every glorious note.



Post #4123J: Stocks and Employment; Wrestling

Finally, a Tweet Goes Viral

I have some informal Twitter objectives and heuristics; I'm sure these are trivial when I routinely read tweets with hundreds of likes, replies or retweets. Most of my tweets, even those with 100 or more impressions, get no similar reactions. I think I've had a few that went into dozens of likes, and it seems every several days someone reacts to an unoriginal meme I tweeted on Krugman saying the Internet's effect would be no greater than that of the fax machine. (I ad-libbed I was still waiting for him to fax in his economic forecasr). Perhaps I'm violating some Internet etiquette, say in returning the favor in following others or promoting their content.

I've rated my tweets as successful if they draw 100 impressions and/or I go over 1000 impressions daily. I'll say the occasional tweet that goes over 1000 impressions as going viral.

I give myself extra-credit for reply-tweets getting 100 impressions. For example, on National Hamburger Day, one In-and-Out Burger fan declared victory over Whataburger, a personal favorite. When I went on a business trip to Eglin AFB, FL, I was delighted to see some in the area (I had to drive 10 miles, but it was totally worth it). In-and-Out Burger, primarily on the West Coast, has an almost mythic reputation, particularly in the Los Angeles area. The lines can be long, it's almost impossible to find a seat, and the menu is the most streamlined I've ever seen in a fast food place (like 3 combos: single burger, double burger, and cheeseburger). It's good food, and I like the Bible verses on wrappers or cups. But during the year I lived in southwestern Arizona with one local In-and-Out, I only went there once. In the Tweet reply, I mocked the hype of In-and-Out as "all bun, no burger", a tongue-in-cheek reference to the idiom "all hat, no cattle". That ab lib earned 160 impressions (to date) and a couple of likes. Plus, I noted my affection for the Jalapeno & Cheese Whataburger I had  in Florida.

It had been a while since I scored a 1000-impression tweet.  I've probably had a dozen or so over my Twitter history but none over the last several months. I haven't found a formula, but it helps when you're tweeting on a trending hashtag. Again, I don't tweet for the sake of stats. So what happened this (Tuesday) morning Transportation Secretary Chao (McConnell's wife) got knocked for not divested yet stock in an asphalt company for which she had  served as a director. (It turns out Chao expected a cash payout on deferred shares, which she had reported. Apparently the company had a policy of delivering shares vs. cash, and the issued shares had appreciated, e.g., about 18% since). There is no allegation that Chao has used her position to favor the company in question. I do agree Chao should have divested all holdings potentially in conflict of interest in her official job for the sake of appearance, and she should have been aware of receiving stock and thereby divested ASAP. But the fact is that Chao's connection to the company was well-documented, and any related subsequent decisions would have been scrutinized, if in fact she didn't recuse herself or report it.

I saw it as much ado about nothing and tweeted a sarcastic ad lib, pointing out that Trump blew up the infrastructure talks with Nancy and Chuck last week, probably not good for Chao's stock holding in question. The tweet took off and at last check hit over 1560 impressions on one of my better days on Twitter, over 4275 impressions.
       
I've worked in the past for at least 2 consulting affiliates of accounting firms, and I had to crosscheck my taxable and retirement accounts against accounting client lists and report/divest any hits. I do understand the ethical questions, e.g., if the auditors detected fraud, I got wind of the news and sold my position before the news hit the market, I would have avoided a huge loss. But the fact is I had no contact with the auditors, and I had made investments before taking the job. Furthermore, my investments were diversified to lower risk. So any one investment was not material to my overall finances.

WWE Notes

I think the DUMBEST belt idea I've ever heard of is the new 24 x 7 belt which wants you to believe that a wolfpack of wrestlers, desperate for title, go after the current champ, with a jogging referee keeping up for an impromptu challenge match. You really don't get a storyline for a match; there is a lot to say about something like a TV belt with more frequent/open challenges. I would have to double-check if WWE ever had a TV belt; I know other promotions have.

The Smackdown show teased a heel vs. heel confrontation of Flair vs. Evans after the latter lost to champion Bayley; Evans seemed to blame Flair's outside interference for her loss. No doubt Flair thinks she deserves a rematch for the belt she lost after MITB winner Bayley converted minutes later; maybe she thought Lacey might threaten her rematch for the title. Now I thought the WWE was thinking of making them a heel tag team. Maybe it still is--remember that the Bar (Cesaro and Shaemus) started out as a something like a 7-match program.
 
It's not clear where they're heading with Kevin Owens; he hasn't feuded yet with the returning Big E, a natural given his feuds with the other 2 New Day members.. Maybe pairing him up with a returned Sami? And it seems that Nakamura is an obvious, credible challenger to either babyface challenger (Rollins or Kingston). It was interesting to see them bring back Ziggler to challenge Kingsto

Much new hype to new wrestling promotion AEW, which has attracted prominent WWE veterans like Chris Jericho and the Rhodes brothers (Dustin and Cody) and especially Moxley, aka Dean Ambrose. TNA is still around (reprising Rob Van Dam and one of my favorite heels, Big Poppa Pump), although WWE did bring Jeff Jarrett back for a brief feud with Elias, but TNA's broadcasts haven't been in my cable lineup for years. I do occasionally catch the syndicated Ring of Honor broadcasts.

I was surprised to see WWE bring back Goldberg to face Undertaker; I thought Goldberg retired after jobbing to Lesnar a while back. And apparently Orton and HHH are resurrecting their old feud  although I haven't seen any relevant promos.                   

Tuesday, May 28, 2019

Post #4122M: A Libertarian Debate on Trump; Stossel on Harvard and Political Correctness

Quote of the Day

Every improvement in communication makes the bore more terrible.
Frank Moore Colby 

A Libertarian Debate on Trump



Stossel on Harvard and Political Correctness



"Patriotic" Trade Wars



Choose Life









Political Cartoon

Courtesy of Michael Ramirez via Townhall

Musical Interlude: My Favorite Vocalists

Bryan Adams, "Somebody"



Monday, May 27, 2019

Post #4121 M: Memorial Day; D-Day; Ron Paul: Bring Our Troops Home!; the Mugging of Tulsi Gabbard

Quote of the Day

Blessed is he who carries within himself a God, 
an ideal, and obeys it. 
Louis Pasteur

D-Day



Ron Paul: Bring Our Troops Home!



Brion McClanahan on the Progressive Assault of Non-interventionist Gabbard


Choose Life











Political Cartoon

Courtesy of Jerry Holbert via Townhall

Musical Interlude: My favorite Vocalists

Bryan Adams, "Run to You"

Post #4120 J: Emails Internet Shopping; Twitter Following

A Pet Peeve: Re: Email Subject Lines

This is over and beyond the "cc the world" irritant I often encounter in CYA business emails. For example, in my last position, a DBA providing feeds to my production database was using old Oracle client software which did not support the more secure algorithm I was implementing for client connections. (I had gone through the channels over the change, but the message had not gone through. So there were high-visibility data transfer failures, and I became his scapegoat.) I did not have any documentation of his tech stack and would have assumed his client software version would have been an issue during a recent database audit. He insisted that upgrading the client software to a different version would have unintended consequences on his tech stack. I then provided Oracle documentation on how to install an upgraded client into its own Oracle home. Basically he started appending civilian managers to his uncooperative responses, raising nonsensical FUD, trying to convince them the STIGs (government audit compliance objectives) had a huge loophole for software which would "soon" be upgraded and if I wanted to implement an algorithm, I could downgrade to SHA1 which his client software accommodated (but had been deprecated at least 5 years ago and explicitly rejected by the STIGs). I responded (paraphrased),  "Dude, it takes maybe 15 minutes to set up the new client software, less than it takes you to write an email." Basically, this got me in political hot water, because the government managers thought that I, a mere expendable contractor, was trying to tell a civilian (civil servant) what to do. My contractor supervisor and program manager got complaints from government managers. My dotted-line functional manager said, "Jeez, Ronald. This guy is a civilian; I have to work with him on other things. Contractors come and go. I didn't get the word out to him on this; it was my bad." [There was a prior issue with the rogue DBA I won't discuss here. Let's just say he was difficult to work with, that he didn't understand conceptually what he was reading.]]

 All of the managers were in a difficult position, because they had to support my audit compliance objectives. It was more a question of knowing my place; for example, Information Assurance did have the authority to mandate compliance, and so I reported the incident to them. I left my position before he complied.

But in this segment I'm really targeting other abuses of RE: headers, which is fairly new to me, a tactic I've only noticed over the last few months in personal emails. I'm getting RE: headers from businesses and recruiters; to me, it's suggestive they are responding to one of my own emails, but in fact I never read an earlier email. I think the gimmick is annoying and counterproductive in the sense I have no intention to reinforce the tactic.

Sometimes you have to put up with people's idiosyncrasies; for example, my Mom, rather than compose a new email, will reply to an old email. I will often defer opening those emails. (My Mom often forwards emails from a different political perspective. For example, one time she sent me a Paul Krugman column. It may have been via  Dad's friend Oscar, who is old yellow-dog Democrat who often publishes his anti-GOP rants in  San Antonio's newspaper op-ed section, e.g., against George W. Bush. I'm sure in the past I had mentioned I didn't like Krugman, so I asked her why she sent it. She replied, "Because I thought it was interesting.")

Amazon and Walmart

I am actually a regular customer of both retailers, so it's been interesting reading about how Walmart is ramping up its online presence to challenge Amazon, which I think recently passed it in sales. I often use the retailers in different ways. There are certain items that Amazon doesn't really handle well in my experience, like bread and frozen meats.

For instance, I like Ezekiel bread from Food For Life, .I could drive twenty-off miles to a Baltimore area Trader Joe's and buy loaves at a competitive $4.50 or so. But until the last few months, the Walmarts, where I've been probably bought most groceries over the past 6 years, never carried it. I occasionally found it carried in other Maryland supermarket chains in frozen food sections, say, near gluten-free loaves. You could go find it on Amazon, but the shipping basically cost as much, if not more than the bread itself. I haven't bought it yet from Walmart because of a prior Trader Joe's run, when I bought leaves to freeze

I've have some eclectic tastes especially for grass-fed meats and heritage chickens. When I joined Butcher Box, a meat subscription service, they had included one of the latter as a premium. It turned out to be the best chicken I ever roasted, but for some reason, they weren't selling the birds they had offered as a premium. Butcher Box is an interesting concept, typically a variety of cuts, 7-10 lbs at about $120/month. But I suspended my subscription while moving from Arizona. When I moved to Maryland, I found the local Walmart carried a selection of grass-fed items, including roasts for under $7/lb a pound; I can often find the local ShopRite selling Australian grass-fed burger at $3.99 pound. It was like a grass-fed desert when I had lived in Arizona.  There are a few other Internet retailers which apparently aren't integrated with Amazon, at least the last time I checked. As for the chicken, I found hey did have Internet sales, but it was like you have to buy six 3-lb birds at about $150 to make it worthwhile, and I didn't have that much room in my freezer. Butcher Box did sell its own premium chicken, not bad, but a letdown because nowhere near the taste of heritage chicken.

I've occasionally ordered via Walmart.com. One of the first items I found was Antartica Guarana, the leading soda from Brazil. I first tasted it during 1995 work assignments in Brazil. Something has changed since my last order because I now see it is only available in store (where I never saw it stocked--I think I saw it once or twice in Sam's Club years back) and it says it's not currently stocked within 50 miles. Amazon Assistant pops up to say I can buy a 12-pack of diet on Amazon for about $1/can. A bit pricey, but advantage Amazon. I'm often mystified. It was at a Walmart I first encountered New England blueberry cobbler flavored  coffee--but I couldn't find it after I moved (SC or AZ).. But sure enough, I could order it from Amazon. That's now a typical tactic: if I can't find it in Walmart, I'll check Amazon. In another case, I liked these sunflower seeds from a past Walmart not stocked locally, but I could order from Walmart.com.

But to be honest, the walmart.com portal is nowhere close to Amazon's look and feel, include ease of checking purchase alternatives. Amazon makes it easy to reorder. There are other ways Amazon makes it easy to shop, get past purchaser feedback, etc.

Just a few examples of using Amazon as a go-to (your mileage may differ). I bought a cheap egg slicer at Walmart (maybe $4); I had recently rekindled my childhood love for boiled egg sandwiches (although I stopped eating white bread maybe 20 years ago; it's more likely 100% whole wheat,) The old adage--you get what you pay for, The strings of the slicer quickly popped. I went back to Walmart and couldn't find a replacement in stock. I went to Amazon a more expensive but sturdier model with no issues over more than a dozen eggs to date.

Another example: I recently had need for occasional use of an eyepatch. I couldn't find one at Walmart or Walgreen (I had to go there to pick up a FedEx package). But Amazon could help me.

There are often times when I've used Amazon as a virtual Radio Shack. A Garmin USB cable needed to be replaced. I also wanted an adapter so I could use car charger devices in my apartment.

Walmart.com's gimmick is you don't need Amazon Prime to get 2-day free delivery (but if you shop Sam's Club online, you need a premium membership for most free delivery options). But I recall I was looking at some device for recent surgery recovery, but the free delivery date would be days after surgery. I could get sooner delivery--at a steep delivery charge.  I think Amazon sold the same device for maybe $5 more--but I could get free Prime delivery before surgery.

Of course, Walmart's comparison to Amazon Prime is apples and oranges. Amazon's Prime also includes subscriptions to reading, video and music services, not to mention a choice for a free Kindle book download among editor choices. Among other things, I streamed the "Atlas Shrugged" trilogy recently. No, Prime isn't cheap, but I find value with membership.

I'm all for increased competition from Walmart, but it's not stacking up well in my own experience--just taking one simple example of my not being able to reorder Guarana. Not to mention Walmart doesn't have the selection I would expect for a leading supermarket. For example, if you've ever been to a Trader Joe's, it provides a vast array of nuts and other snacks. I can't even find the quinoa chips sold at Sam's Club st my local Walmart's. I can't find various alternative  pastas (like chickpea) at Walmart's but at least two major brands at ShopRite. They do carry a brand of low-carb chicken enchiladas I like, but increased the price to $5; I'll pass. On the other hand, you won't find Oprah's heavily promoted cauliflower crust pizza. And while they sold Blue Bell ice cream in AZ, you won't find it in stock in MD.. I'm sure you can come up with your own list.

There are other niches I don't think I have seen done well on the Internet. Take greeting cards. For contrast, I have wide feet (like EEE or more). Zappos makes it easy to find a relevant. I similarly find it easier elsewhere to find pants that accommodate my waist and inseam. But when I shop for greeting cards, I often find the selection picked over; finding a religious card for Mom or cards for my goddaughters can be hit or miss. Not to mention I can write better verses than most I routinely encounter.

Volatility Among My Twitter Followers

Whereas Google counts only 1 follower to this blog, I don't really know much about my readers; my Mom and a couple of nephews have reported seeing some posts; a past work colleague reported seeing it, which I took as a veiled threat. A recent week showed my reader pageviews dropping into the single-digit range, this after a several week period of higher counts I hadn't seen over the past year. I don't know if Google put me on the naughty list or whatever. My stats have marginally improved, but nowhere near several posts with 2-4 dozen readers. As I've written several times, I don't write for the stats, but any writer likes to see his effort  acknowledged.

The Twitter stats are easier to assess, and sometimes the ones drawing impressions are accidental. To give an example today (Memorial Day),  I got exasperated by a couple of Dems quoting Barry Obama. (I think it's more of a way of a contrast against Trump). I don't care for Obama or Trump. So I snapped back how international freedom indexes deteriorating under Obama, pointed out the disastrous Libyan intervention, etc. At last count, that reply had 115 impressions--more than several other original tweets.

Now the last time I checked my Twitter followers, I didn't personally know any of them. I think a number of them simply followed me over the quality of the tweets themselves. A plurality are probably pro-liberty. I think for a while I had a subgroup of Trumpkins, probably because there are some things Trump has done I agree with and I often slap back against Dems/leftists. The Gray Lady would promote one of their stupid op-eds, and I would blast them. I'll often play along with popular hashtag games. Others seem to identify with my pro-immigrant tweets, pro-life tweets, etc. But a lot of this is speculation.

For a long time I had a range of 30-40 Twitter followers. Then a couple of years back, for some reason, my followers suddenly doubled or more to the 76 or so level. And then it seemed to be every day a follower or two dropped every day until it bottomed out at about 58. I experienced a small bounceback to 62.and has been stable for some time now. I've now gotten back to a pattern of 1000+ impressions per day, but no new followers.

So for the first time in a while, I saw my followers drop down to 61. It came after I wrote a tweet critical of anti-Iran policy, but the timing could be coincidental. I've also written some unpopular pro-life tweets, I've responded critically to Trump tweets, among other topics.

Personally, I think my feed is diverse and very interesting. I am curious why I lose followers; I know there are people I admire who I stopped following for varying reasons, including a flood of my Twitter feed (and heaven knows, I myself often tweet over a dozen times daily).

Ironically, some of my most viewed recent posts are the new "social media edition" format. However, each embedded tweet has a link to follow me, and I don't think I've gotten any new followers that way..

Sunday, May 26, 2019

Post #4119 M: Ron Paul on the Violation of Assange's Rights; The Necessity of Discipline

Quote of the Day

There is nothing so comfortable as money, 
- but nothing so defiling if it be come by unworthily; 
nothing so comfortable, 
but nothing so noxious 
if the mind be allowed to dwell upon it constantly. 
If a man have enough, let him spend it freely. 
If he wants it,let him earn it honestly. 
Anonymous  

Ron Paul on the Violation of Assange's Rights



Tom Woods and Michael Malice on William J Buckley and other Villains



Discipline and Your Life




Choose Life









Political Cartoon

Courtesy of Steve Breen via Townhall

Musical Interlude: My Favorite Vocalists

Bryan Adams, "This Time"

Saturday, May 25, 2019

Post #4118 M: Single-Payer Healthcare Systems Are Bad; Child Migrant Deaths

Quote of the Day

It only stands to reason that 
where there's sacrifice, 
there's someone collecting the sacrificial offerings. 
Where there's service, 
there is someone being served. 
The man who speaks to you of sacrifice 
is speaking of slaves and masters, 
and intends to be the master.
Ayn Rand  

The Tragedy of Migrant Child Deaths in US Custody



Single-Payer Healthcare is Bad


Celine Dion Carpool Karaoke



Choose Life









Political Cartoon

Courtesy of Gary Varvel via Townhall


Musical Interlude: My Favorite Vocalists

Bryan Adams, "Cuts Like a Knife"

Post #4117 Social Media Edition

Facebook

I've been assigned Top Fan status in the Milton Friedman and the Being Libertarian groups, in addition to earlier groups (Pro-Life Libertarians, Acton Institute, Cato Institute, and Feminists for Life). I would not be surprised to be awarded additional badges over the coming weeks.

[a Pro-Life Libertarian thread focusing on a cluster of child migrant deaths while in US custody. There were, in my opinion, the predictable restrictionist trolls, trying to blame parents of unaccompanied minors, etc. I had a separate argument with another Top Fan who argued the government did all it could do with a specific discussed young girl. I. don't know enough specifics beyond the fact she died about 6 months in custody. Unfortunately, kids do die even with loving, attentive parents. This other guy claimed they got her to the hospital ASAP; I'm more of a skeptic; I haven't found a good source, but I think during 6 months, they should have been able to assess and treat her condition.]

This thread is being spammed by xenophobes who don't have a clue that this is a libertarian thread. The right to travel is a human right. That anybody should die while in government custody (beyond, say, natural causes like old age) is an abomination.

[Here I'm responding I believe to an anti-Amash Trumpkin irate over Amash's conclusion that Trump should be impeached. He's arguing Amash will fall to s Trumpkin primary challenger next year.]

You're full of shit. The establishment recruited a self-funding millionaire to primary Amash in 2014, and Amash kicked his ass. Justin Amash is not a Nazi cake conscription like Gary Johnson. Johnson nevertheless won an unprecedented 3% in 2016. Amash may not win, but he could kill Trump's reelection hopes.

{I think PLL posted a quote from Planned Parenthood argued about 3/4 of Americans oppose repeal of Roe v Wade.]

I've misfiled my response but basically I pointed to Gallup which showed only about half of Americans supported unfettered abortion, and about half of Americans consider themselves pro-life. I think I pointed unalienable rights are not decided by tyranny of the majority.

[I think another PLL thread featured a pro-abort tweet about pro-lifers needing ro MYOB.]

To quote Marley from "A Christmas Carol": "Mankind was my business".

[PLL quoted Sarwick, chair of the Libertarian Party saying pro-lifers needed to stop persecuting and prosecuting women choosing abortion, an absurd strawman.]

This would be enough for me to leave the Libertarian Party except Maryland recently informed me they no longer recognize my LP registration.

[This was a thread over Trump reportedly preparing to pardon certain American soldiers convicted of war crimes.]

 I consider abuse of pardon authority to be an impeachable act. Trump pardoning war criminals is a God-awful mixed message to be sending the troops. I don't know who he's hoping to impress. "Gee, those guys who pissed on dead Muslim bodies are getting treated so unfairly."

[This was a thread involving a pro-abort referencing female "reproductive rights", a euphemism for abortion, probably the ritual claim no others have a right to an opinion, etc.]

There are alternatives to killing a preborn child, including adoption. The woman has alternatives to unprotected sex, including the option to refuse intimacy.


But more directly, the same woman would not trust a rapist exercising his reproductive rights or other actions violating the non-aggression principle.

[This was based on a meme contrasting assault weapons to abortion. A predictable pro-abort tactic is to claim pro-life conservatives are hypocritical, e.g., if they don't promote gun control policies. This is one of my classic ad libs, which attracted a number of likes.]

Personally I consider D & C surgical tools assault weapons

[This was a thread focusing on Trump's claim of no obstruction of justice, perhaps on Amash's conclusion otherwise.]

Trump is a corrupt thin-skinned son of a bitch. Trump has no principles beyond self-promotion. Everyone in the world knows the SOB abused the office trying to shut down an investigation in which we had a vested interest. Whether or not Trump ended up firing Mueller is beside the point; his own lawyer says that Trump ordered him to do it.Trump is not "innocent" because his lawyer refused to carry out an illegal order.

[separate]

If others aren't aware, Justin Amash is one of the few libertarians in Congress. Trump's whole act is that he is above the rule of law. Screw Trump!

[Here I'm dealing with a likely Trumpkin defense that although he may have wanted to fire Mueller, Mueller was able to complete his investigation, a likely impeachment defense. But intent is itself criminal. For example, just because a criminal's bomb doesn't go off doesn't vindicate his actions.]

Trump's threats to the Mueller investigation are a matter of public record, enough for Congress to consider shielding Mueller. The fact that Trump is playing word games with McGahn makes it clear MxGahn's allegation of being ordered to fire Mueller is credible. Whether Trump ultimately did not fire Mueller doesn't mitigate the crime of intent.

[separate comment]

Amash is spot on. The fact of the matter is that Trump sought to control an investigation in which he had a vested interest. This is exactly what Nixon tried to do. Nixon did not authorize the Watergate break-in/ Trump clearly tried to do something which contradicted the rule of law; his threat to Mueller was serious enough for Congress to consider mechanisms to protect Mueller. This is a matter of fact.

[This is from a group called something like "don't blame capitalists for socialism's failures". I started a mini-kerfuffle of aorta by responding drug testing companies profit by mandatory testing of welfare recipients. I chose not to respond to trolls playing annoying word games, e.g., my use of the term "crony capitalist".]

I'm sure crony capitalist drug testing companies love this idea.

[This was a thread on people starving under socialism. I'm making the point that the socialist elite do manage to eat. In my response below, I attached a photo of Venezuela's portly Maduro scarfing down a stuffed tortilla.]

Well, if you are a party leader you can eat, even if you don't own any pets.

[Here I'm responding to a pro-abort libertarian meme basically mocking no rape exception to abortion restrictions.]

Let's rephrase from polemical bullshit: a baby should be executed for the sins of her father. So much for the unalienable right of life and the non-aggression principle.

[This is a Facebook excerpt I came across (not my own content) which I found profoundly moving, a mother who chose not to abort her rapist's child.]

I have a 4 year old son.
He giggles in his sleep.
He plays with Tupperware in the bathtub.
He picks me bouquets of dandelions and crab grass.
He pronounces hospital "hostable".
He tells me how much he misses me when I walk to the mailbox without him.
He was conceived in rape .

One of those things is not something you would know just by spending time with him.
One of those things doesn't matter at all.

Not to us anyway.
Not to him.

My son, who this week in the news and all over social media I've seen branded as "rapist's child", "monster's seed", "devil spawn", "rape baby" and "carrying the evil gene", doesn't know that his existence is polarizing. He's not aware that the President of his country believes in protecting the lives of unborn children...but not children like him.

People are so quick to throw out numbers, statistics, percentages. Less than 1%. That's what they say. Less than 1% percent of abortions are due to rape.
Here's another fact. I'm looking at a less than 1% right now. He holds 100% of my heart.

Babies are conceived in loveless marriages, through infidelity, on prom night in the backseats of family minivans. The "how" doesn't make them less deserving of protection. The intrinsic value of human life is not dependant on circumstances. If life matters- life matters.

This isn't about choice.
This is about recognizing the humanity of all unborn children.
Honoring life as sacred without moral relativism or ethical inconsistencies.
Without exceptions.
No compromise.

My 4 year old son..
His hands are always sticky.
He loves dinosaurs and superheroes.
His favorite thing to eat is toast.
He gives the best hugs.
He thinks knock knock jokes are hilarious.
He was conceived in rape.

One of those things doesn't matter.
One of those things doesn't matter at all.

-Jennifer Christie

Twitter