No. What is an anachronism in the Constitution is the USPS. The concept of the tyranny of the majority is not an anachronism; the Founders fought for independence over a much lighter tax burden than you progressives/fascists have imposed already WITH the electoral college.
— Ronald Guillemette (@raguillem) March 19, 2019
POTUS should represent ALL of the US, not simply the corrupt interests of heavily populated states and cities. This country was founded on individual rights, not mob rights to violate the property/other rights of the minority. "Electoral College"
— Ronald Guillemette (@raguillem) March 19, 2019
Nope. What the electoral college does is ensure, e.g., that California vote surpluses do not make competitive votes in smaller states irrelevant.
— Ronald Guillemette (@raguillem) March 19, 2019
This country was founded on individual, not collective "rights". You are attempting to rationalize tyranny of the majority and exacerbating factionalism and corrupt special interest coalitions. The founders discussed popular election of the President and rejected it, rightly so.
— Ronald Guillemette (@raguillem) March 19, 2019
Cherokee Lizzie has picked a ludicrous strawman and has demonstrated that she lacks the judgment to be in elective office. White supremacists are on the fringe and irrelevant; progressives would create them to rationalize trite charges of "racism" to their ideological opponents.
— Ronald Guillemette (@raguillem) March 19, 2019
Meme of the Day: The IRS. Without theft, who would build the government? pic.twitter.com/XHIPN7e0dE
— Ronald Guillemette (@raguillem) March 18, 2019
It's St. Patrick's Day. Progressives don't have to wear green; they are already spreading the morally corrupt Politics of Envy.
— Ronald Guillemette (@raguillem) March 18, 2019
Another irrelevant New York politician whose only achievement is being at the right place at the right time when Caroline Kennedy turned down an appointment to fill Hillary Clinton's seat. "Kirsten Gillibrand"
— Ronald Guillemette (@raguillem) March 17, 2019
Trump's disgraceful attack on the late McCain voting against "repeal & replace" ignores his own economically illiterate position for the latter. Those of us who love liberty were all for repeal, but against replace. Either party's advocacy of federal intervention is nonsense.
— Ronald Guillemette (@raguillem) March 17, 2019
Bashing a dead man behind his back? We want to repeal and replace your election. That'll happen next fall.
— Ronald Guillemette (@raguillem) March 17, 2019
My thoughts and prayers for the Muslim victims and family survivors of the unconscionable massacre in New Zealand. God loves all His children. This assault against religious liberty is an abomination and a threat to all of us who love liberty across the world. Christchurch
— Ronald Guillemette (@raguillem) March 17, 2019
Look at most companies, like supermarkets, Amazon, etc. They are not catering to the consumption of the upper 1%. If they make money in voluntary transactions which the rest of us find make us better off in exchange (low prices, variety, etc.), why does it matter?
— Ronald Guillemette (@raguillem) March 16, 2019
The pillage of the 1% reminds me of a clever Maryland lottery spot a few years back. The farmer's wife has just discovered their hen is laying golden eggs. She rushes to tell her husband the great news. She finds him chomping on a chicken leg.
— Ronald Guillemette (@raguillem) March 16, 2019
What corporation spends $3.5T or has run up a $22T, has done it with a gun pointed at your head? And yet leftists are totally oblivious of the corrupt political elite who steals your money and shoves it through a top-heavy, feckless, unaccountable bureaucracy?
— Ronald Guillemette (@raguillem) March 16, 2019
Ever notice how the leftists target the upper 1%? Never mind the federal government alone spends over $3.5T each year. You could steal all the assets of all the rich people and not balance the budget for one year. Who else would you need to steal from to make up the difference?
— Ronald Guillemette (@raguillem) March 16, 2019
I just got a letter from my Maryland county board of elections saying that they no longer recognize my Libertarian Party affiliation. Screw the two-party duopoly! I refuse to vote for corrupt political whores!
— Ronald Guillemette (@raguillem) March 16, 2019
I want the Congress to sue Trump over his rationale of calling the Congress unwillingness to fund his political boondoggle "an emergency". Not even a single jurist on SCOTUS would buy into his bogus rationalization to grow the imperial Presidency.
— Ronald Guillemette (@raguillem) March 14, 2019
BULLSHIT, you unconstitutional Bastard-in-Chief. No, citing law school graduates from Trump University doesn't count. Your stealing money without the consent of the Congress is an abuse of power, an impeachable offense. Resign NOW!
— Ronald Guillemette (@raguillem) March 14, 2019
How is it that senators need a majority to pass a budget but Trump only needs a minority of votes to steal money without approval of Congress?
— Ronald Guillemette (@raguillem) March 14, 2019
Well, I was an outspoken Sasse supporter until now. Now I regard him as no better than any of the other political whores in Washington DC. Sasse
— Ronald Guillemette (@raguillem) March 14, 2019
Gardner sold his personal integrity in the hopes Trump won't primary him. What Trump did is anti-constitutional. There's no going back. I feel sorry for Colorado--having to choose between a parasitic Democrat and a Trumpkin. Vote LP! "Cory Gardner"
— Ronald Guillemette (@raguillem) March 14, 2019
Don't be a retard! There's nothing "constitutional" or "conservative" over Trump's stealing from the taxpayer against the explicit will of the Congress which holds the power of the purse,
— Ronald Guillemette (@raguillem) March 14, 2019
Let me guess; this leftist has Lincoln-like delusions of using a lost Senate campaign to launch a bid for the Presidency. Beto
— Ronald Guillemette (@raguillem) March 14, 2019
No. I agree discrimination is wrong, and its practice by government at any level is unconstitutional. But allowing intervention into the private economy by corrupt political whores, bureaucrats and interest groups is unconstitutional and morally reprehensible. #EqualityAct
— Ronald Guillemette (@raguillem) March 13, 2019
What kind of a low-life steals a little girl's birthday money? Government scumbag or other parasite? https://t.co/E3VsvK4Bwk
— Ronald Guillemette (@raguillem) March 13, 2019
Meme of the Day: economic illiterate pic.twitter.com/EcbHtu5Z0E
— Ronald Guillemette (@raguillem) March 13, 2019
The Trumpkin sycophants, like their fellow "Conservative in Name Only" Sean Hannity, are in a state of denial. No true conservative supports Trump, who has somehow managed to pile up more than $1T of debt in a decent economy. "Paul Ryan"
— Ronald Guillemette (@raguillem) March 13, 2019
Ryan is simply stating the undeniable truth that Emperor Trump is wearing no clothes. "Paul Ryan"
— Ronald Guillemette (@raguillem) March 13, 2019
Remember Trump initially tried to primary Speaker Ryan--and failed. Trump is a loser like Obama, who lost both the House and the Senate. He's already halfway there, losing the House. "Paul Ryan"
— Ronald Guillemette (@raguillem) March 13, 2019
Ryan is simply stating the undeniable truth that Emperor Trump is wearing no clothes. "Paul Ryan"
— Ronald Guillemette (@raguillem) March 13, 2019
Remember Trump initially tried to primary Speaker Ryan--and failed. Trump is a loser like Obama, who lost both the House and the Senate. He's already halfway there, losing the House. "Paul Ryan"
— Ronald Guillemette (@raguillem) March 13, 2019
The "Conservatives in Name Only" are trying to scapegoat former running mate Ryan for Romney's 2012 loss. No, the godfather of ObamaCare dug his own grave with his polarizing 47% soundbite and failed to run against Bush/Obama policies. "Paul Ryan"
— Ronald Guillemette (@raguillem) March 13, 2019
Unlike Minority Leader McCarthy, Ryan is no sycophant. Unlike the Dunce-in-Chief, Ryan actually attempted to do something about unsustainable entitlements and became a lightning rod for parasitic Dems who portrayed him as pushing Grandma off the cliff. "Paul Ryan"
— Ronald Guillemette (@raguillem) March 13, 2019
Well, an unpopular IL Gov. Blagojevich won reelection; so it's not impossible that Trump could win reelection if Democrats nominate a second loser in a row. But Trump lost the House despite a decent economy, and he's not doing well with independent voters. "Paul Ryan"
— Ronald Guillemette (@raguillem) March 13, 2019
Let's see. What incompetent Loser-in-Chief is the only President in history who has never come close to a net positive approval?
— Ronald Guillemette (@raguillem) March 13, 2019
Justin Amash is truly embracing election reform by challenging the existing duopoly to provide more choices. Think the Dems care about true reform? They are still attacking Starbucks' former CEO for going third party in 2020. pic.twitter.com/U0MFxUyOm3
— Ronald Guillemette (@raguillem) March 12, 2019
This is Soft Rock America. Interest payments to sustain a $22T debt amount to hundreds of billions already crowding out other government spending priorities. What is the Democrats' response to unsustainable fiscal madness? https://t.co/MQK1HyNnpa
— Ronald Guillemette (@raguillem) March 10, 2019
If government could simply print money to accommodate its ever growing budget, there would be no need for taxes. There used to be a time when GOP Presidents paid down on the debt; Trump refused to run a balanced budget when he had a GOP-controlled House. https://t.co/7w33zGMdwL
— Ronald Guillemette (@raguillem) March 10, 2019
Just a reminder that Trump's economically counterproductive tariffs cost Americans (not foreign producers) $18B, much of which was given out to farmers whose foreign sales dropped in retaliatory responses to Trump's trade war. https://t.co/H55Hjws2G5
— Ronald Guillemette (@raguillem) March 10, 2019
The revelation the Pentagon is spending millions of dollars a month on lobster & crab is a moral outrage to the coming generations inheriting a $22T debt. What's their excuse--they don't want service members fighting over crab legs in Chinese buffets?https://t.co/wAr7y3bHhu
— Ronald Guillemette (@raguillem) March 10, 2019
The bonehead move to implement DST was an initiative of the Democratic Congress and President (Wilson). The hubris that politicians can succeed in energy policy conservation objectives better than the law of supply and demand is damning. #DaylightSavingsTime
— Ronald Guillemette (@raguillem) March 9, 2019
Images
