Analytics

Thursday, February 28, 2019

Post #4004 M: Bernie's Bedtime Story is Evil; Leftist Stereotypes; Tom Woods on Medicare For All

Quote of the Day

If I die tonight in my sleep: 
Let me have hugged and told my children that I love them, 
Let me have told my mother how much she is loved and appreciated, 
Let me have helped a friend or better, a stranger, 
Let me have worked very hard these past hours in the name of my personal progress, 
and, Let me have gone to sleep with the knowledge that I did the very best I could do today.
Rick Beneteau  

Leftist Stereotypes of Conservatives vs. Gays



Tom Woods on Medicare For All



Choose Life









Political Cartoon



Musical Interlude: My Favorite Vocalists

Art Garfunkel, "Second Avenue"

Wednesday, February 27, 2019

Post #4003 M: Busting Liberal Myths; Whose Fault: The 2008 Economic Tsunami?

Quote of the Day

Managers think about today. 
Leaders think about tomorrow.
Dan McCreary  

DEAD WRONG: We're Going To Die From a Pandemic!



DEAD WRONG: Robots Are Taking Over!



What Was Responsible For the Economic Tsunami?


Choose Life









Political Cartoon

Political Cartoons by Bob Gorrell
Courtesy of Bob Gorrell via Townhall 

Musical Interlude:My Favorite Vocalists

Art Garfunkel, "I Shall Sing"

Tuesday, February 26, 2019

Post #4002 M: "Lifeboat"'; Stossel on Crony Capitalist Big Sugar

Quote of the Day

Life is an opportunity, benefit from it. 
Life is beauty, admire it. 
Life is bliss, taste it. 
Life is a dream, realize it. 
Life is a challenge, meet it. 
Life is a duty, complete it. 
Life is a game, play it. 
Life is a promise, fulfill it. 
Life is sorrow, overcome it. 
Life is a song, sing it. 
Life is a struggle, accept it. 
Life is a tragedy, confront it. 
Life is an adventure, dare it. 
Life is luck, make it. 
Life is too precious, do not destroy it. 
Life is life, fight for it.
Mother Teresa  

Justin Amash and the House Liberty Caucus on Trump's "Emergency"



Lifeboat

God bless those who do what they can to help and treat migrants with dignity and respect  I definitely think this documentary is worth an Oscar.



Stossel on Corrupt Big Sugar




Choose Life




Big sister meets little sister...so sweet.




Welcome to the world, little dude!


Political Cartoon


Political Cartoons by Tom Stiglich
Courtesy of Stiglich via Townhall

Musical Interlude; My Favorite Vocalists

Art Garfunkel, "All I Know". The first of 5 #1 70's hits on the A/C chart, my favorite Garfunkel tune, written by one of my favorite songwriters, Jimmy Webb. I love, love, love this song; did I mention I love this song?

Monday, February 25, 2019

Post #4001 M: Prp-Abort Senate Dems Block Efforts to Protect Abortion Survivors; On the Administrative State

Quote of the Day

If you kick a stone in anger, 
you'll hurt your own foot.
Korean Prover

Ben Sasse On Senate Democrats Blocking Protections For Abortion Survivors



Liberty vs. the Administrative State



Ron Paul on Intrigue and Meddling in the Venezuela Crisis



Choose Life









Political Cartoon



Musical Interlude: My Favorite Vocalists

Paul Simon, "You Can Call Me Al". Simon's last major pop hit and it marks the end of our Simon retrospective. Next up, his longtime partner, Art Garfunkel.

Sunday, February 24, 2019

Post #4000 M: Retrospective; Ron Paul on NATO; Tom Woods on Dubious "Progressive" Analyses on Libertarians

Quote of the Day

He is a man of sense who does not grieve for what he has not, 
but rejoices in what he has.
Epictetus  

Retrospective

Having just celebrated our tenth blogiversary nearly 7 months back, it's still astonishing I've managed to publish 4000 posts. I don't log my hours in preparing content, but even in the case of video content, I screen more videos than I embed and some of my original essays or rants are written over multiple days. So  there's probably over 10,000 man-hours invested in the history of the blog.

Although readership has sagged some days to the point I could probably fit readers in a large SUV (and other days I attract a few hundred impressions). Quality doesn't necessarily attract views; case in point: I've recently written 2 rants on immigration and nationalism vs conservatism and viewership barely broke double digits. You can never tell what will attract eyeballs; I wrote a standalone tweet mocking the arrest of a pro football owner over solicitation in Florida--not even responding to any trending hashtag--and the last time I checked, it had over 470 impressions. On the other hand, I wrote a compelling quote on the nature of socialism, and to date it's gotten impressions of maybe a third of my followers.

Have I evolved politically over these 4000 posts? Yes. In 2008, I championed John McCain, not Ron Paul.  I think a lot of it had to do with his "no spin" reputation and a reputation for bipartisan reconciliation, his critique of Bush's military policy in Iraq. But he made some bonehead mistakes during his campaign, e.g., the suspension of his campaign over TARP, not riding the opposition to TARP given his populist leanings, the self-inflicted choice of Palin (which he seemed to enjoy for swerving the media at the expense of his own experience argument against Obama). In subsequent years, McCain lapsed into predictable soundbites and seemed eager to intervene militarily at the drop of a hat.

If I had to do it over again based on my current perspective, would I have supported Ron Paul in 2008 and 2012? Of course. Would he have been elected if nominated? Of course not.

Now begins the road to 5000, which based on recent trends might happen in the latter half of 2021. The last couple of years I've published at least 430 posts. Any changes? I'm thinking of spinning off my social media digest in its own quasi-regular format. I may also do a more direct libertarian content series, including in a Thomistic or "Ask Ron Paul" type format. Maybe a 2020 election series. A Catholic libertarian series. A political humor series. I could go on and on. Of course, I'll continue my daily miscellany posts.

Ron Paul on NATO




Tom Woods on "Progressive" Misconceptions of Spontaneous Order



Choose Life










Political Cartoon


I'll probably take a break from covering FreedomTunes.

Courtesy of the original artist via YAL on FB


Musical Interlude: My Favorite Vocalists

Paul Simon, "Late In the Evening"

Saturday, February 23, 2019

Post #3999 M: Countdown 1 to 4000; Hooray for Billionaires; Leftist Attacks

Quote of the Day

A cloudy day is no match for a sunny disposition.
William Arthur Ward  

Woods on Hooray For Billionaires




Leftist Assaults on Conservatives



Life Expectancy Increases Despite Climate Change



Choose Life









Political Cartoon



Musical Interlude: My Favorite Vocalists

Paul Simon, "Still Crazy After All These Years". I still remember SNL had Simon dress up in a turkey costume to sing this song.


Friday, February 22, 2019

Post #3998 M: Countdown 2 to 4000: Benefits of Charter Schools; the Counterproductive War on Drugs

Quote of the Day

20% of what you do accounts for 80% of the value.
Vilfredo Pareto  

Charter Schools: Cheaper But Better Outcomes



Legalization Has Had More Effect on Foreign Drug Supplies Than Federal Prohibition

A usual disclaimer that personally I have never transacted in nor encouraged the use of recreational drugs, the domestic sex trade or other failed public policy prohibition targets. I simply believe it's bad public policy; domestic interventions ironically drive up prices and profits for operators in black markets. High profits don't necessarily deter black market transaction; they may exacerbate other crime problems. I remember when I lived in Milwaukee thieves had bashed in my car windows to steal my factory stereo system (which quite frankly sucked); I can't imagine they got much of anything in selling used poor quality car stereos. Paul Krugman would no doubt see my car broken window as boosting the local economy. (This is in part a libertarian joke, making reference to the broken window fallacy; humorists shouldn't have to explain their jokes.)



Ron Paul On Individual Rights vs. Collectivist Demands


Choose Life




Welcome to the world, sweetheart!






Political Cartoon




Musical Interlude: My Favorite Vocalists

Paul Simon, "50 Ways To Leave Your Lover". His only solo #1.

Thursday, February 21, 2019

Post #3997 M: Countdown 3 to 4000; Meet a Dreamer; the Blessed Virgin Mary; Medicare For All

Quote of the Day




















Meet a Dreamer



Chief Justice Roberts and the Wrong Kind of Judicial Restraint: ObamaCare




A Senior Lady is Fighting to Keep Her Picture of the Blessed Virgin Mary



Choose Life



Isn't she a cutie?





Political Cartoon Medicare For All



Musical Interlude: My Favorite Vocalists

Paul Simon (with Phoebe Snow), "Gone At Last"


Wednesday, February 20, 2019

Post #3996: Countdown 4 to 4000; Government is the biggest problem; Ron Paul on Trump Administration vs Iran

Quote of the Day



Government is the Biggest Problem



Ron Paul On the Trump Administration vs. Iran



Tom Woods on the Market



Choose Life










Political Cartoon



Musical Interlude: My Favorite Vocalists

Paul Simon, "American Tune"



Post #3995: Rant of the Day: Anti-Immigrant Cliches: We Love LEGAL Immigrants, Without Borders, Not a Country

My great-grandparents emigrated from French Canada (Quebec) in the latter half of the nineteenth century. I've occasionally blogged on my Franco-American heritage during the life of the blog. I don't know my ancestors' stories, but the Quebec diaspora to the US was motivated primarily by bleak economic circumstances, including the population growing faster than farmland. The economically diverse, prosperous US to the South, particularly in nearby industrialized New England, held an attraction. The Franco-Americans are a proud people with a hard work ethic;. They weren't attracted by a (nonexisting) social welfare state, although no doubt based on a cohesive culture and the Catholic Church, a commitment to help the less fortunate, they were able to muddle through still challenging economic opportunities. A number of Francos, including my ancestors,  settled in Fall River, in southeast Massachusetts close to the RI border and a short drive from Providence. Fall River at the time was a thriving textile center. In fact, my maternal grandmother and godmother was proud of her master weaving skills, but when she married my grocery owner grandfather/godfather, he had some old-fashioned notions about her being s full-time homemaker and that he earned enough that they didn't need her second income for their family of 4.  (I had a few disagreements with my grandfather, and this was one of them.) My grandmother died of complications from colon cancer before I turned 3, done too soon; I and younger siblings have already outlived her lifespan.

But make no mistake: life working in the mills, farms (my Dad worked at a relative's farm during summers), etc., was not an easy lifestyle: long hours for meager wages. My maternal great-grandfather was a businessman with at least one failed business. My grandfather entered into a partnership with his father and basically rebuilt a successful mom-and-pop grocery from  scratch. He barely managed to keep the business afloat during the Depression. A lot of customers still owed him money on credit at the time he shut down his store to retire. (My uncle was a diocesan priest, and my Mom was a full-time Air Force spouse raising a young, large family in Florida.)

But make no mistake, the French did not find a positive reception in many sectors of American society. In one of my past posts, I quoted an old WASP-ish NYT op-ed, attacking fast-breeding French-Canadian immigrants living in unassimilated closed communities around Catholic churches and parochial schools, stubbornly holding on to their language and culture.  To groups like the KKK, we were a triple threat: immigrants, French-speaking and Catholic.

In fact, my grandparents were US-born and fully bilingual (English and French). So were my folks. Mostly they spoke French at home. My folks and maternal uncle were fiercely American and did not consider themselves hyphenated Americans. No older relative ever discussed the old country. I was the only sibling to be early-raised bilingually, and my kindergarten teacher didn't know how to cope with a bilingual child. There was some talk of holding me back in kindergarten until they administered an IQ test. My parents responded by no longer speaking French in front of their children. (My own French today is largely out of practice although I did take a French literature course in undergraduate school.)

For some reason, I (and my younger brothers) always had an interest in our Franco-American roots. I can remember in primary school reading everything I could find, e.g., on the French and Indian War. Did it have anything to do with identity politics or being part of the Roots generation? Not really. It's rare to meet other Francos; we have a distinctively French surname few Americans can pronounce properly. My Mom would occasionally prepare cultural dishes like cretons (seasoned ground pork spread) and toutiere (pork pie). To this day, I would prefer a cretons sandwich over any other food.

I always loved our distinctive iconic reputation of being the world's melting pot. Being raised in the integrated military gave me early exposure to black, Asian and Latino Americans (among others). I always felt that diversity makes life more interesting. (However, don't confuse this to mean I support the affirmative action industrial complex or racial identity politics.)

I've always been pro-immigration, although I've occasionally paid lip service to respecting the rule of law. However, the more I've looked at the specifics of immigration restrictive policies over the past century, the more disgusted I've become with this assault on our largely open immigration heritage.

Like I've mentioned, there have been some ugly movements in American history, including repression against black people (including at the expense of state/local government), anti-Catholicism, and anti-immigrant (e.g., the Know Nothings from the nineteenth century. My perspective has always been, my kingdom ends at my property line. If anything, people from other states or countries enrich the economy with more diverse goods and services, can help alleviate local shortages driving up the cost of living. Life isn't a zero-sum game. My unalienable rights are not diminished by other people, regardless of origin, pursuing their happiness.

I do have some pet peeves over xenophobes who offer sham rationalizations of their morally contemptible prejudices.

Let me start with a point of view that even one of my favorite libertarians, Ron Paul, promotes, along with almost every media "conservative" (and I'm particularly unhappy over "conservatives" quoting Milton Friedman out of context), the lie over the lure of the social welfare state. For one thing, immigrants, including "legal" ones, are ineligible for a period of time (at best, always if undocumented). Social welfare programs came in the twentieth century--after immigration was restricted around 1916-1925, It clearly wasn't a factor attracting my ancestors. How do we account for the robust immigration in the nineteenth century? Many of  them were attracted by economic opportunity, freedom  from an oppressive homeland regime, etc. Since when did those original motivations go away?  And there are lots of "progressives" willing to document that our social welfare system pales compared to other democratic countries. So assuming the welfare system is the motivation seems, at best, questionable.

Not to mention leaving one's country is usually a difficult choice: You are leaving your personal support system, including your relatives, your culture, for a new country which may not be accommodating, a number of uncertainties, and your resources may be limited. You may be forced to liquidate your home and other possessions at low prices. Here's a relevant quote from an earlier cited source:
At the outset, two important points need to be established: the first one is that there are costs associated to emigration. These costs are economical, emotional and cultural. The economical costs are fairly easy to estimate as they are quantifiable. When individuals leave, assets have to be liquidated, often at a loss. Many material possessions have to be left behind. Packing material has to be acquired. Then there is the cost of transportation to their intended destination, and the cost of sustaining themselves during their travel. Lastly, there will be further costs of settlement, once the destination has been reached. The emotional costs are more difficult to estimate. To migrate often means to leave behind beloved family and friends with whom long association have forged strong emotional ties. To leave family and friends behind certainly meant to leave behind one’s support system. It also always meant to forego the familiar surroundings of one’s region and ancestral home, the land that generations of their ancestors had toiled, the landscape that had defined their environment since birth. All migrants have to face these wrenching emotional costs, and they will frequently remember very fondly that which they have left behind. The cultural costs may also be great. If one immigrates from a region that has particular cultural characteristics, such as way of life, language, religion and traditions, that are quite different from the host society then one will have to adapt to a far greater extent than a migrant that would share many cultural elements with the receiving society. Thus, it is evident that the greater the costs, economical, emotional and cultural, the less likely one is to leave one’s country for another. While the economical costs of French Canadians to leave for the United States might have been relatively small, the emotional and, especially, the cultural costs were quite high. They left behind a traditional rural society with strong family ties. They entered an industrial world, alien to them by virtue of its way of life, language and religion. Given these high emotional and cultural costs, it is surprising that so many French Canadians engaged in the migration process between 1840 and 1930. In fact, it would be normal to consider that French Canadians, who only find their language and religion dominant in a part of the continent, would be the least likely to engage in the migration process. Indeed, since the beginning of the 20th century, Quebec has had consistently the greatest rate of retention of its population of all provinces in Canada (for more recent statistics, see this table as well). These comments serve to highlight particularly the factors of causation for the emigration of French Canadians to the Unites States: if French Canadians were the people least likely to migrate from Canada, what severe problems impelled them to leave? 
The second factor to raise is one that is familiar to historians and sociologists: immigration is the result of the interplay of push and pull factors. As mentioned above, if there are potentially considerable costs to migrate, then one engages in this process only when there are very serious reasons to do so. These reasons may be personal, economical, social, political. Historically, the great mover of large numbers of people has been poor or deteriorating economic conditions. When one’s life is miserable, when one does not see a way to pull out of poverty, then one is literally pushed out of one’s environment. In this respect, much discussion of the poor economic conditions in Quebec will be found below. If that is so, where should the migrant go? Sometimes, economical circumstances, or political restrictions, will limit the choice. However, there is no doubt that what will be the most attractive alternative, what will pull the immigrant, is the land around them that is the most prosperous. In this respect, it should be noted that in the 19th century, the United States emerged as one of the most industrialised and prosperous nations on earth. To the Québécois, the United States appeared as a vast Eldorado whose streets were literally paved with gold. These factors are explored further below.
Back in 1995 I went on two business trips to Brazil, the first nearly 3 months long (I was initially told about 2-3 weeks). I don't remember how the subject came up, but my project lead told me he could negotiate a six-figure salary for me to work for the client (the largest credit card operation). This would have meant maybe doubling my salary at a much lower cost of living. I never expressed interest; Brazil was a nice place to visit, but I didn't want to live there. I had a girlfriend I really loved during my stay and on multiple occasions expressed an interest in her moving to the US so we could continue our relationship; regardless of her feelings for me, she had no interest in leaving her family or country. (Obviously I felt the same way; I could have chosen to stay with her in Brazil and I didn't.)

So this whole idea of America being overrun by a flood of immigrants is disreputable propaganda: in fact, under relatively open immigration until WWI, the US was not flooded with immigrants, for the most part, there is a cost-benefit assessment to migration, it's not easy on one financially or emotionally. Only a fraction of the world's population chose to emigrate to the US under more open policy. I myself have moved between states, not because of relative state benefits but because I had a job waiting for me. I've been trying for 20 years to return to Texas. My Mom has made the case for years: most of the family lives in Texas. My brother who lives in Kansas is building his eventual retirement home in Texas.

Let me close this rant by reviewing a couple of talking points I especially despise:

  • "Without borders, you don't have a country."  Rubbish. That's like saying without enforced state travel papers/regulations at border entries or barriers along state lines, you don't have a state. I don't have an issue with the "open borders" label, which the right-wing xenophobes seem to equate with leftism--and I'm far from that. Let me point out that unions have generally opposed immigration, which they believe is "unfair competition" driving down wages. Eisenhower, facing a similar "crisis", legalized temporary workers, and immigration arrests dropped nearly 90%.  It was a Democratic President (JFK/LBJ) who did away with the above-referenced bracero program. Unions reject temporary worker programs, etc. In fact, ring-wingers are often anti-liberty, wanting business owners prosecuted for failing to report undocumented job applicants--in effect, making employers slaves to the State. We open immigration advocates do think there are legitimate health and security concerns for a limited State, but these are not served by a Big Government bureaucracy and manipulation of immigration by anti-market quota schemes over the past century.
  • "We appreciate LEGAL immigration." This comes across similar to the comment "some of my best friends are black". I saw a Prager U. clip titled similarly, and although I've embedded a number of their clips, I immediately knew what this clip would argue, i.e., get in line and do it the right way. This is absurd. You can spend 15 years or more waiting in line under the current system. You can reform the system by doing away with anti-market policies like quotas. Why are people working around the legal system? Because the legal system doesn't accommodate the market. 

Tuesday, February 19, 2019

Post #3994 M: Countdown 6 to 4000; Ron Paul on Neo-Con Plots for Venezuela; the First Amendment

Quote of the Day


Ron Paul on Neo-Con Targeting Venezuela



The First Amendment and Constitutional Constraints



For Free Speech on Campus



Choose Life









Political Cartoon



Musical Interlude: My Favorite Vocalists

Paul Simon, "Loves Me Like a Rock"

Monday, February 18, 2019

Post #3993 M: Countdown 7 to 4000; President's Day; Eminent Domain Abuse

Quote of the Day

Doing little things well is a step toward doing big things better.
Harry F. Banks  

A Brief Commentary on This Holiday

I had to do some computer DBA security work over this past weekend; quite often outages on nights, weekends or holidays serve related purposes to minimize impact on users during regular workdays. My point of contact used "Washington's Birthday" which seemed somewhat odd; I probably have heard it called Presidents' Day since early adulthood; this includes TV ads which celebrate sales on or around every public holiday. I was vaguely aware of some states fusing the February Washington and Lincoln birthday celebrations. But on closer reflection, my contact was absolutely correct: on the federal calendar, it's still Washington's Birthday.

In recent years, I had become much more of a critic and skeptic of Lincoln; this had nothing to do with any neo-Confederacy or slavery sympathies. (To any libertarian, slavery is a first order offense against the unalienable right to liberty. Many of us feel the collapse of slavery in the South was inevitable, especially given a slave-free Northern Union which would repeal the Fugitive Slave Law.) But to us, Lincoln through the Civil War violated the non-aggression principle and the principle of voluntary association.The Emancipation Proclamation did not apply to Union slave states. His first inaugural address made it clear that he would support retention of Southern state slavery from a constitutional perspective; what he would not negotiate is loss of his Southern state tariff income. Not to mention his flagrant violations of the Bill of Rights, including repression of the critical press.

Let's be clear: I find it ironic for a republic to celebrate a surrogate for a strongman. To be honest, if we are going to celebrate government (ironic for a libertarian), I would prefer a more inclusive Public Service Day, also recognizing the contributions of legislators and jurists.

In more recent years, I've used the holiday to feature less celebrated Presidents like Grover Cleveland and Calvin Coolidge. But in the future, I'll probably return to calling it Washington's birthday. This is a man on multiple occasions voluntarily withdrew from public service or any related personal agenda or ambition. He was nonpartisan during his Presidential tenure.

Did Washington Have an Affair With His First Love?

We may never know, but there's a difference between Washington the man vs. Washington the legend. Personally, I doubt this undocumented scandal rumor, and I would like to think Washington's attention was not diverted during the course of the Revolutionary War, but I think Washington should be judged on his public job performance vs. his private ethics.



Washington vs. Personal Political Agenda



A Victory Against Eminent Domain Abuse in NJ



Choose Life





Political Cartoon



Musical Interlude: My Favorite Vocalists

Paul Simon, "Kodachrome". Simon barely missed his first solo #1 hit. This is not his only song where he references colors. In "My Little Town" he references the lack of color in his childhood remembrances.

Post #3992: Rant of the Day: Trump's "National Emergency"

According to Google Dictionary, an emergency is "a serious, unexpected, and often dangerous situation requiring immediate action." An example of an emergency is you've lost a lot of blood because of an accident or unexpected violence and need immediate medical attention; your house is on fire and you're trapped inside. Your appendix ruptures. You're driving and get caught in a flash flood. You get bitten by a rattlesnake in a remote area. You slip on ice and fall unconscious in freezing weather.

What's not an emergency? Donald Trump's promise to build a Southern border wall. Let's point out that unauthorized foreign visitors peaked before the 2008 economic tsunami, and there are roughly 11 million of them. Of those, probably a quarter to a third originally entered the US legally (e.g., they've overstayed their visas). Of the remainder, a significant percentage are spouses and dependents; if anything, stricter border protection without a legal right to return discourages reverse migration and encourages workarounds to family reunification in the US. US-born children of unauthorized migrants are constitutionally citizens by birth and eligible for applicable benefits by equality under the law.

Let's also point out that we already have walls, particularly around populated centers at or near the Mexican border. Much of the border without fences/walls is inhospitable terrain, and hence the marginal benefits of expansion are, at best, dubious.

Federal policy which heavily restricts legal paths to immigration is much of the problem. When Eisenhower faced a similar problem, he embraced the legal bracero (temporary worker) program, and immigration arrests plunged by up to 90%.  One of my east Indian friends told me he had to wait 15 years before he could arrive (on an H1B visa). Many legal immigrants have to wait years to be reunited with family members. If anything, Republicans like Trump and Cotton (AR) want to cut legal immigration quotas even further, including lower-skilled workers, even as America ages.

Trump has been hyping the purported statistics associated with unauthorized migrants, especially allegations of violent crime, welfare usage, etc. He seizes on every rare incident and promotes it out of proportional contexts (say, vs. native-born murderers). Keep in mind 11 M migrants are less than 4% of our population, and migrants are generally ineligible for federal welfare state benefits, even years into a legal residency.

I'm not going to paraphrase Alex Nowrasteh's brilliant summary here, comprehensively debunking Trump's absurd claim of an immigration "emergency", including tame crime statistics north of the Mexican border.

But even if you subscribe to the myth that immigration is a crisis (even as Trump heavily promotes refugee caravans which are statistically insignificant), unauthorized immigration has been an issue for decades; in fact Obama had a reputation of being a Deporter-in-Chief. It's been the status quo, not a recent contagion in the Trump Presidency.

More troubling is Trump's unconstitutional attempt to divert funds legally allocated elsewhere. Keep in mind he didn't get his funding when the Republicans held the House last term. But the hyped Master of the Deal hasn't been able (or willing) to cut a deal for funding from two different Congresses, an implicit concession that he didn't have the authority to do what in fact he is now doing. This is lawless; it voids the rule of law. And, in my opinion, it makes the case for impeachment.

Sunday, February 17, 2019

Post 3991 M: Countdown 9 to 4000; Google and Censorship

Quote of the Day

He who asks a question is a fool for a minute; 
he who does not remains a fool forever.
Chinese Proverb  

Google and Censorship

PhilosophyInsights is a channel I have frequently sampled. I don't always agree with their content, but I've found videos I haven't found otherwise on my own. I'm very disappointed by Google's apparent discrimination against conservative/libertarian content.



A Libertarian Take On Social Media and Politics/News



Omar and the Fallacy of Loaded Questions

I am not a fan of Abrams or in general past American policy towards Central/South America. But Omar is not interesting in questioning but in speechifying at Abrams' expense.



Our First Nominees for Jackass of the Year


  • Rep. Omar for her anti-Semitic comments, loading questioning in committee, etc.
  • the Virginia governor and others involved in past blackface incidents
  • the governors of NY and VA promoting abortions to the point of delivery and/or infanticide of born-alive abortion victims
  • Rep. Ocasio-Cortez' economically illiterate/ruinous Green New Deal
  • NYC de Blasio's attack on Amazon's decision to cancel a NY second headquarters because of leftist targeted political attacks attacks.
So far Omar has the early lead, but the year is still young.

Choose Life





Stepdaughter wants to be adopted





Political Cartoon




Musical Interlude: My Favorite Vocalists

Paul Simon, "Mr and Julio Down By the Schoolyard"

Saturday, February 16, 2019

Post #3990 M: Remembering the 2008 Economic Tsunami; The Trump-Ending Recession

Quote of the Day

A person is only as big as the dream they dare to live.
Unknown  

Woods on the Crisis of 2008




The Dem Socialists Are Beginning To Turn Off Their Rich Supporters



Stockman on the Coming Trump Recession

I tend to agree with much that Stockman says.



Choose Life









Political Cartoon



Musical Interlude: My Favorite Vocalists

Paul Simon, "Mother Child Reunion". His first solo Top 10 hit and pure pop magic.


Friday, February 15, 2019

Post #3989 M: About to Start the Countdown to #4000; My Favorite President? Probably Grover Cleveland

Quote of the Day

The future is uncertain... 
but this uncertainty is at 
the very heart of human creativity.
Ilya Prigogine  

My Greatest Hits: February 2019

It has been a bit of a slow start to February, with my top 5 viewed posts over the past month all from January. Like I've repeatedly said, I don't write for the money (there is none) or the numbers--I remember teaching one class with only 2 students at the end of the semester (long story; it was a data structures course at UTEP, and there was a competing popular instructor (a non-PhD, not a professor) who didn't require programming--which is like teaching a cooking class without using real food). I was a first-semester professor. I later asked my senior area colleague why he didn't tip me off what was going on. He shrugged his shoulders and said (paraphrasing), "I taught the course the way it should be taught, like you're doing. I wasn't very popular, either.")

I suspect that Google has intervened adversely over the past year (I'm not sure of the business case for not promoting content on their platform). It does seem like the readership numbers are bottoming out; even my Twitter followers seemed to have stabilized after a steep unilateral 20% drop in a short period of time, although it may simply be a dead cat bounce. I still have a favorite post (on conservatism vs. nationalism) over the past few weeks which I decided to promote on Twitter (I do link to my blog in my profile) (not paid promotion, I mean I linked to the post in a tweet). The readership has improved for the post but it's not clear the tweet was effective--I don't see any clicks for the link. I have a number of pro-liberty followers, so I'm somewhat discouraged I didn't get a better boost; I honestly like the quality of the original piece.

But then I've noticed on Twitter when I tweet on immigration (I'm strongly pro-immigration), my impressions (reader counts) seem to dip (although I've probably attracted a handful of followers because of my relevant opinions).

Will Witt Does His Version of Jaywalking on the Presidents

This coming holiday Monday has rapidly become my least favorite on the calendar, probably because in my libertarian phase I've developed a natural repulsion to authoritarian figures. I've developed a deep dislike of Lincoln over the Civil War, and even among Presidents I generally like (like Calvin Coolidge and Ronald Reagan), I have serious disagreements (e.g., immigration and spending, respectively). Probably my favorite overall? Grover Cleveland (e.g., his sound money advocacy, free trade, anti-imperial, unrivaled personal integrity).



Prager on Cherokee Lizzie and Pseudo-Racism



Busting Liberal Myths: Consumerism



Choose Life









Political Cartoon



Musical Interlude: Simon & Garfunkel

"Wake Up, Little Suzie". Their last charting hit was a rare remake, of the Everly Brothers classic. Next, we'll cover Simon's solo career.

Thursday, February 14, 2019

Post #3988 M: Progressives can't handle "Jesus Loves You" Valentines on Campus; the Green New Deal Nonsense

Quote of the Day

You are going to let the fear of poverty govern you life 
and your reward will be that you will eat, 
but you will not live.
George Bernard Shaw  

You Can Send Me "Jesus Loves You" Valentines Anytime

I haven't gotten a Valentine from a girlfriend in years....



The Green New Deal



Woods on the Green New Deal



Choose Life









Political Cartoon



Musical Interlude: Simon & Garfunkel

(with James Taylor). "What a Wonderful World"

Wednesday, February 13, 2019

Post #3987 M: Leftists v. Economics and the Free Market; Nope, I Won't Wear a MAGA Hat to Date a Trumpkin

Quote of the Day

Early to bed, 
early to rise 
makes a man 
healthy, wealthy,and wise.
Benjamin Franklin  

Leftists Don't Care Much For the Free Market



It's Hard Enough For Me Without a MAGA Hat To Get a Date



Woods on Fusionism



Choose Life









Political Cartoon



Musical Interlude: Simon & Garfunkel

"My Little Town". Hands down, my favorite and most replayed Simon & Garfunkel tune; I've played and sung along with this song probably thousands of times over the past decades. I love, love, love this song; one of the greatest songs ever written. Did I mention that I love this song? At the time it was years after their breakup and both finding success in solo careers.

Tuesday, February 12, 2019

Post #3986 M: Equality is About Fair Rules; Stossel on a Better School

Quote of the Day
If Congress can do whatever in their discretion can be done by money, and will promote the General Welfare, the Government is no longer a limited one, possessing enumerated powers, but an indefinite one, subject to particular exceptions.
James Madison

Equality is About Fair Rules



Stossel On a Better School



The Green New Deal?



Choose Life









Political Cartoon



Musical Interlude: Simon & Garfunkel

"America"

Monday, February 11, 2019

Post #3985 M: Ask Ron Paul; The Passing of Pro-Liberty Walter Jones

Quote of the Day

In work, the greatest satisfaction lies - 
the satisfaction of stretching yourself, 
using your abilities and making them expand, 
and knowing that you have accomplished something 
that could have been done only by your unique apparatus. 
This is really the center of life, 
and those who never orient themselves in this direction 
are missing more than they ever know.
Kenneth Alsop

Ask Ron Paul: Green New Deal; Free Trade; Liberty at School


Superb response on free trade. I would have answered it somewhat differently, but this is great.



Ron Paul on the Late Congressman Walter Jones




The March For Life



Choose Life










Political Cartoon



Musical Interlude: Simon & Garfunkel

"El Condor Pasa"

Post #3984 Rant of the Day: Nationalism and Conservatism

Candace Owens is perhaps the most prominent woman of color in the right wing media, particularly well known for her adverse consideration to identity politics. Over the past week, Candace set off a social media kerfuffle, suggesting, if I may rephrase Bon Jovi, "Hitler gave nationalism a bad name." She argues where Hitler went wrong was not so much engaging in fascist/socialism policies within his recognized national borders but in his globalism agenda.

The immediate response from progressives was Owens' failure to recognize/denounce the policies underlying the Final Solution, the racist ideology and program of genocide against Jews and other "undesirables" whose very existence conflicted with the interests of the "superior" Aryan race.

Owens' discussion should be seen in the context of Trumpist principles of "America first" nationalism vs. a nefarious globalist "New World Order" of elitists conspiring against American interests, including those adversaries secretly entrenched as the Deep State and the Swamp trying to fend off the legitimate mandate of Trump validated in the 2016 election.

Those of us pro-liberty take exception of Trump disingenuously adopting an old isolationist catchphrase ("America First"). Trump has done nothing to scale back an empire of almost 800 international military bases; he has intervened in Syria, which does not pose a credible military threat to the US, never mind ISIS; he has hired prominent neo-cons like John Bolton. He does not oppose expansion of American meddling commitments in NATO, but resents other members freeloading off America's defense expenditures. He still has not moved away from our commitments to Afghanistan, Iraq, and elsewhere, yet rejoices in an American defense outspending the next 7 or 8 highest spending countries'. He is more than willing to impose, unilaterally or otherwise, tariffs and economic sanctions, which contradicts the old libertarian saying that when goods do not flow freely cross borders, armies will. We would also argue Trump's market interventions as corrupt, arbitrary and counterproductive; for instance, his protectionism on domestic steel occurs at the expense of steel-consuming companies, not to mention has unintended consequences of other exporters who face retaliatory foreign trade responses.

But let me point out that German expansion, based on "more living space" Lebensraum, predated the rise of Hitler. Among other things, like former concessions and lost territories from prior war settlements, an overpopulated Germany (particularly with respect to the farm economy), needed territory to sustain the German economy. Hitler rejected measures to shrink the German population, say by emigration or birth policies. They primarily intended to expand into east Europe, not the west, but England and France declared war on Germany when their ally Poland was invaded (and I'm sure Germans were not happy over the terms ending the previous war). I am not trying to defend Nazi Germany here or justify the Lebensraum principle, particularly under its genocidal implementation under Nazi Germany. But Hitler had limited resources and did not want to risk American intervention or a two-front war. Did he have ambitions for global conquest? Maybe, but I suspect his agenda was a greater Germany spanning east Europe. And his version of ethnic cleansing, including depopulation of target areas, was particularly monstrous.

But Owens' oversimplifying history in the context of the Trumpist nationalism vs globalist battlefield simply reflects her illiterate knowledge of history.

Trump doesn't believe in the legitimacy of international agreements (including trade deals) preceding his Presidency. This itself shows no regard for law. It was not Henry Cabot Lodge moving to block Wilson's ill-fated League of Nations.

What then do I made of Owens' nationalism? Am I not a former Air Force brat, a Navy veteran? Does my heart not stir at the sound of the national anthem? America, right or wrong? Love her or leave her? Do I believe in the Bush Doctrine, i.e., : "1.) Preemption, 2.) Military Primacy, 3.) New Multilateralism, and 4.) the Spread of Democracy"?

Make no mistake; I'm proud to be an American in the tradition of  unalienable individual rights and limited government. But I believe an 800 foreign military base empire is a profound overreach and unsustainable; it's not our constitutional role to be the world's unloved policeman. I disagree with nearly all military engagements since WWII. This does not mean I approved of Saddam Hussein's use of chemical warfare, his repression of Shiite Muslims or his invasions and/or conquest of neighbors like Kuwait. I similarly disapprove of innumerable economic sanctions, of Trump's unilateral trade wars. I similarly dislike how the federal government has grown at the expense of state/local government and individual liberty.

Conservatism  is not a proxy for the status quo or authoritarianism; in fact, leftists want to restrict political speech, means of self-defense, economic interventions (e.g., nationalized healthcare). In America, conservatism is based on a legacy of the principles of individual rights and limited government. And limited government includes the nature and extent of our common defense. It doesn't mean buying into fear-mongering by the political elite  to rationalize preemptive military or economic interventions. We argue that unnecessary initiatives divert attention and resources from legitimate small government mandates and taxpayer pockets.