Analytics

Thursday, November 30, 2017

Post #3462 M

Quote of the Day

It is not a disgrace not to reach the stars, 
but it is a disgrace to have no stars to reach for.
Benjamin Elijah Mays  


Tweet of the Day





The Lazy Millennial Tackles the Holidays




Tax Cuts and Economic Growth




Should Nazis Have Free Speech? YES!

I just want to make one immediate point on this debate; it deals with whether groups have a right to speak on campus. It really depends on whether or not the university is government-sponsored. A government school cannot discriminate on perspective. You can make a case that a voluntary, private institution has a right to promote a common perspective.



Political Cartoon

Courtesy of Bob Gorrell via Townhall

Musical Interlude: Christmas Mix 2017


Andy Williams, "The Most Wonderful Time of the Year"

Rant of the Day 11/30/17

I don't recall ever hearing so many sexual misconduct stories breaking out all over the place: politicians, entertainers/movie moguls, most recently, long-term Today anchor Matt Lauer. Let me be clear: I'm not in a state of denial that sexual harassment and more serious sexual misconduct happens, but I know in some cases false charges have been made, can be almost impossible to refute (disproving a negative), and the PC police will almost always presume even totally undocumented, no evidence allegations, that somehow the alleged victim is always presumed to be truthful. Never mind the indisputable cases of men convicted of rape, later overturned on DNA evidence.Yet these same women, who made knowingly false charges, are held up as "courageous" for stepping forward with little, if any evidence. In fact, the politically correct would have you think those of us who dare question dubious charges are "victimizing" alleged victims a second time. Actually, no--there is the old story of a boy who cries wolf one too many times. There are notorious cases, like the McMartin scandal in the 80s  where we saw a similar mushrooming of alleged improprieties at the expense of young school children. In many cases, we see the reverse of the presumption of innocence. You have people whose lives have been ruined, financially, careers, reputations, over circumstances of fabricated charges. Others will not accept exoneration of failed judgments or dismissed charges, that somehow the judge or jury was bought off or similar excuses.

Why do people make false accusations against other people? Try to explain evil in the world. It's like trying to argue the Texas church mass murderer somehow was justified in executing children with up-close shots to their heads. There could be 101 reasons, e.g., somebody exacts revenge against someone because he or she feels wronged by them, or maybe they don't like their opinions on things, they're looking for a convenient scapegoat, they are reading too much into circumstances, etc.

Let me explain with a couple of simple personal examples (I've never engaged in misconduct, but I'm trying to explain how others can misread a situation. Early in my IT career, I was working as a programmer/analyst at a well-known insurance company in south-central Texas. My senior colleague had his married couple friends visiting him for lunch; he may have briefly introduced them to me in passing. He came back from lunch, chuckling at me. He said that when he briefly mentioned me at lunch, and the wife called me "eyes", i.e., she felt that I had been leering at her, undressing her with my eyes. I was horrified. To be honest, I couldn't have picked that woman out of a lineup if my life depended on it. And I wasn't interested at all, even if she were single.  I have no idea how her fertile imagination worked, but it was a departure from reality. Not to be cruel, but I remember some woman who once made it clear over the grapevine she would never go out with me. I have no idea where that came from; I had never even mentioned her in my prior conversations, and to be brutally honest, I found her physically unattractive and never even considered asking her out. Getting rejected by women you like is bad enough--but getting rejected by someone you would have never asked out in the first place takes sheer chutzpah on their part.

Then there was my first job in Houston. I knew there was a nepotism policy; our receptionist had just married one of my programmer colleagues before my start. (My other colleagues were relentlessly teasing her for being the "little" sister; her younger sister, from her own admission, was 6 feet tall and had a curvier figure. She wasn't that little at 5'9" and went around insisting she was the "big" sister. She lost her job a few weeks later; receptionists are easier to hire than talented programmers.) One of my colleagues was a single woman (let's call her Jackie); she was working on one of our big accounts, an Exxon catalog application. Her Exxon contact  was typically a rising star among Exxon's younger executives who normally stayed only a short while, so Jackie knew the system probably better than the clients themselves. But Jackie, unlike me, couldn't handle stress very well, and was as close to a coffee addict as I've ever seen--her hands would literally shake without her fix of morning joe. I'm basically pointing out that Jackie was kind of a mess and not really that attractive to me, but I thought why not get to know her better; we're both single. I knew one of her favorite childhood memories was going to performances of the Nutcracker Suite--and in a big city like Houston, there's bound to be a performance somewhere. So I asked if she was interested in going with me to one of them.

Now I'm not really sure what happened. I suspect maybe in her she took it as an implicit marriage proposal and began worrying for her job under Peter's nepotism policy. But 2 things I remember: she converted the proposed date into a company social event, and then my manager Peter had a talk with me. "It's come to my attention that you're dating Jackie. And I just need to let you know if this goes anywhere, I'm going to have to let one of you go."

One thing was certain. I had only asked Jackie personally and never discussed it with anyone else. So Peter must have found out from Jackie herself. Second, I wasn't dating Jackie; the performance was an attempt at a first date, and I apparently naively believed that a first date is an introductory date, with no further obligation from either party. I had never even gone with Jackie to buy a cup of coffee outside the building, let alone hold her hand or try to kiss her. I thought the world had gone mad, presumptuous on steroids.

As to Peter's termination threat, I was easily the most talented programmer on staff, but I realized the Exxon catalog business was a big piece of our business, and the decision might go against me (although I'm sure Peter knew Jackie was very high maintenance and probably should have been transitioned to other projects).  Needless to say, whatever fleeting interest I had in Jackie wasn't worth the risk, and I really didn't like she wasn't discreet about the situation. All she had to do was say "no". God knows a number of other girls and ladies didn't have a problem turning down a date with me.

In academia, I was in a very precarious situation as a single male and never dated one of my colleagues or students (current or former). Not that there weren't opportunities; let's just say that many young women are attracted to authority figures (and a professor is one of those) and can be very aggressive.  (You would not believe what some coeds would do; one lecture at UH I ended up spending the last 10 minutes of lecture talking to the floor in front of me.  I was seriously pissed and showed up to next lecture waving a handful of drop slips I was prepared to use.)  One young woman, while I was debugging her COBOL program (about the least sexy thing one can do in life), slipped out her bare foot from her shoe and slipped it up inside my left pant leg, stroking my shin up and down. And I'm thinking, "Damn, what do I do now? Nobody is going to believe what's happening. Or she'll turn the tables on me and then it's my word against hers and I'll lose. I don't need this getting in the way of the PhD." I just pretended it never happened. When she and her accompanying friend finally left the office, I heard Ms. Footsie laugh to her friend, "Did you see how I turned the teacher on?"

Probably the worst thing (beyond some coed telling me she would be willing to do anything for an A, and I responded she should study hard), and I've never told anyone until now, happened my third semester at UWM. This young woman was the leader of some malcontents who tried to extort me into an assignment extension literally 2 weeks before the due date. I usually had policies in place, like I would never see a coed in my office with the door closed. And I arranged my office furniture in a way I had to squeeze my way through a foot or so space between my desk and the wall or bookcase, thinking that a student would be isolated in the font of the office facing me. Yeah, right. So this obnoxious young woman (who I'm sure has been a well-deserved failure in life), without my knowledge, had followed me behind my desk and as I'm looking at my monitor facing the wall at a right angle from my desk, I can feel her press her genitalia against the left shoulder of my white dress shirt.  Talk about an "oh, shit!" moment; I had never heard of something like this happening to anyone else. I pretended that it never happened and told her she needed to leave my desk area and go to the front of the desk.  I probably should have filed a complaint, but the university administrators would not have been supportive and probably tried to make the [expletive deleted] a "victim".

I'll end up with the true story of a close friend of mine, a fellow socially-inept geek. This does show how absurd (and hypocritically doubly-standard) sexual harassment policies can be. For the first case, a young female (Asian) Indian junior system administrator was obsessed with a senior system admin colleague, also an Indian. I mean like "Fatal Attraction" obsessed, literally stalking him. I think he lived in Chicago, several Metra stops away from the southwest suburbs. One night she shadowed him (unknowing) all the way to his apartment and tried to argue her way into his apartment. The company mostly laughed off the reported incident.

My friend was attracted to a personable young, pretty blond account associate (maybe in her mid to late 20's).  Maybe around mid-October, he tried to ask her out. She told him she was flattered, but she had been dating this guy a while, and while he hadn't made a commitment to her yet, she was hopeful in the near future. So my friend tells her, well, if she wasn't interested in him [my friend], he understand and wouldn't bother her again. She hesitated and said, "No, I would like to keep my options open."

Well, after Christmas break, my friend decided to try again. Over the prior 2 months, there had no been no contact beyond polite greetings in hallways, no personal conversations, phone calls, notes or mails, no contact outside the office building. Should he had given it more time, for her to make the first move? But he had no way of knowing how things were going in her relationship; besides, she's the one who left the door open; she could have said, "Sorry, I'm just not into you" from the get-go. She hadn't come back from vacation yet. He left a note at her desk, asking if she was interested in his buying her lunch at the building cafeteria. BIG MISTAKE! NEVER, NEVER PUT IT IN WRITING!

Unexpectedly, he got called into an immediate meeting with the executive VP, someone from HR and others. He was told, first of all, the woman had filed a sexual harassment claim (apparently being asked to lunch at a cafeteria by a geek made her feel "uncomfortable"), the company lawyers were in possession of the note, the complaint, etc., and if they found the company was liable, he would be summarily fired. He had to sweat out the next 2-3 hours, not understanding how offering to buy a lady lunch was a cause for possible termination. He had never touched her, described her physical appearance or used suggestive or inappropriate language, he always acted acted like a gentleman around her. When he got to his desk, he found a predated, fabricated letter warning that she was tired of his incessant pestering her over unwanted dates, she had told him no repeatedly, and if he asked her out one more time, she would lodge a complaint with the company.

The letter was a total lie, invented after the fact as the pretext for a complaint. What the hell had just happened? He's not a psychologist. Maybe she was hoping to be engaged over Christmas, it didn't happen, and this guy was in the wrong place, at the wrong time. She didn't want this loser; she wanted the guy who didn't want to commit to her. And now maybe my friend was beginning to understand why the other guy wasn't committing. He just didn't understand why she had done this to him; she was trying to get him fired. All she had to say was, "No, thanks. You're not my type." As a future girlfriend told him, "Stay away from this woman; she's evil."

Long story short, the company lawyers exonerated him, but just as a preventive measure had management move him in a different area in the building so they wouldn't run into each other. It also turned out that she sucked as an account associate and was terminated while my friend was on a business trip. Whereas if and when sexual harassment legitimately occurs. it should be addressed, but abuse of process creates other victims, like my friend. I myself have a mom, 4 sisters, and 9 nieces. I don't need a bunch of politically correct bastards telling me how they should be treated in the workplace. You can't regulate evil, but you shouldn't hire it either.


Wednesday, November 29, 2017

Post #3460 M

Quote of the Day

I firmly believe that any man’s finest hour, 
the greatest fulfillment of all that he holds dear, 
s that moment when he has worked his heart out in a good cause 
and lies exhausted on the field of battle – victorious.
Vince Lombardi 

Tweet of the Day











DEAD WRONG: The USSR Stopped vs Enabled WWII




Bill Whittle Is Right On Why We Need a Flat Tax



Price Controls Have NEVER Worked


The political whore Cummings was my Congressman (not that I ever voted for him)



Libertarian Gift Guide


Bitcoins accepted in lieu of cash.



Political Cartoon

Courtesy of Tom Stiglich via Townhall


Musical Interlude: Christmas Mix 2017


Leon Redbone & Zooey Deschanel, "Baby, It's Cold Outside"

Tuesday, November 28, 2017

Post #3459 M

Quote of the Day

Destiny is no matter of chance. It is a matter of choice. 
It is not a thing to be waited for, 
it is a thing to be achieved.
William Jennings Bryan 

Tweet of the Day








DiLorenzo On How and Why Government Lies About Everything


A little dated (Barney Frank retired a few years back), but it's still relevant.



Stossel On How the Working Rich Improve Our Lives Better




Internet Clippings

I did one of these several of these back; I often clip my responses, URL or embedded codes for cartoons or videos interesting quotes or news items using CintaNotes (which has a limited-feature freeware product, highly recommended).

(from Facebook)

Trump: Why would Kim Jong-un insult me by calling me "old," when I would NEVER call him "short and fat?" Oh well, I try so hard to be his friend - and maybe someday that will happen!
How STUPID are you, Trump? Do you think you're "clever" by calling Kim Jong-Un "short and fat" while pretending not to? You need to stop worrying about what other people think of you, whether or not other people "respect" you or the US. This is an insecurity (or maybe even a sign of mental illiness) unworthy of a POTUS.

From a recent charity appeal

This is a Facebook exchange on relationship advice with a nephew (although my sibling and most relatives have never divorced, two nephews have). I haven't had as many relationships as many, if not most men, but there have been women attracted to me, including literally some of the most attractive women I've ever met, who could probably have dated their pick of taller, more handsome, better dressed, popular, or richer guys. It's not that I felt undeserving or insecure of the attention, but I wondered what was it that attracted them to me. (In fact, some of them made the first move.)

 As a never-married bachelor, I am not an expert on this question, but I've been surprised by the comments of past girlfriends. One insanely attractive coed in undergrad school saw in me some of the qualities she wished others saw in her--my being a high-achieving student--and I didn't treat her like all the other guys. Another one said she found me hilarious; I've always had a sense of humor about myself, don't take myself too seriously. A third noticed I was the only one whom showed up at the college chapel in a suit and tie. I think women also like a guy whom shows he's been listening to them. Just a short example: your Aunt Sharon once told me about a Cat Stevens tune she liked. So one Christmas I gave her a Cat Stevens greatest hits album. And she's totally surprised, like she only mentioned Cat Stevens once in a passing conversation, but I remembered it.


This is a dated thread from around the time of the notoriously bad ObamaCare initial opening websites. One of my relatives by marriage started the thread.

[relative]
Without getting into a political discussion, all of the stories about glitches with the Obamacare websites crack me up. As a computer person, I can tell you that there are few, if any, websites or networks that could handle the President and every news channel telling tens of millions of people to "go check out this website today." The number of users is just too high.

What will really be interesting is the chaos with these sites on March 31, 2014, the deadline for signing up. On that day, those sites will lock up cold and I guarantee the deadline will be extended.

[comment] It's kinda like the Christmas Tree lighting at Rockefeller Center. They turn the lights on and everyone snaps a picture that instant. Is it going to look different 5 minutes from now? An hour from now? 2 days from now?

[comment] The voice of reason!

There are technical solutions to the problems [relative] is discussing. Among other things, the workload can be distributed (by hardware and/or software) among large numbers of middle-tier servers. How do you think web businesses manage to handle their user loads, when outages can mean losing millions of dollars? This is gross mismanagement by horrible IT management in the public sector, and I've had to deal with some of these bozos. [relative] is right in the sense that these thing happen in poorly designed systems, but these idiots have had 4 years to plan for accommodating yesterday. The problems [relative] discussed can be simulated--there are IT solutions for that. I know [relative] isn't trying to excuse these idiots; that people will wait until the last minute is also totally predictable. But let's be clear: there is no excuse for what happened. I have done lots of go-lives over the past 2 decades, and we drilled so many times that we never ran into these type issues.

via Cafe Hayek

One of the marks of a good economist is to recognize that money is not at all all that matters.  Incentives come in lots of different forms – often in monetary forms, but often (perhaps even more often) in non-monetary forms.
 The man who diets and goes to the gym regularly might well do so in order to make himself more attractive to potential mates.  The benefit isn’t monetary, and the cost isn’t exclusively, or even chiefly, monetary.  But there’s nevertheless a real cost-benefit calculation going on in that guy’s mind.  Raise the cost (say, he injures a pectoral muscle) or lower the benefits (say, he meets a fetchin’ babe with a fetish for flabby dudes), and he’ll spend less time at the gym.  And vice-versa.
 Another mark of a good economist is to be skeptical of stated intentions.  Talk is cheap.  So if Jones professes his great love of humanity, the economist pays little heed.  (Old joke: Economist and non-economist are strolling in Manhattan.  When they pass Carnegie Hall, the non-economist says wistfully to the economist, “You know, I’ve always wanted to learn to play the piano.”  The economist replies “Obviously not.”)
 Which brings me to the main point of this post, namely, a proposal to screen for truly public-spirited public servants to seek and hold high elected government office.
    We are constantly told that this long-serving senator or that 19th-term representative has devoted his or her life to “public service” – implying that he or she has made genuine sacrifices in order to work for the betterment of society.  Politicians are routinely called “public servants.”
But how do we know that they – more than the ordinary mortals who vote them into office – truly put the welfare of strangers above their own welfare?  Of course, they say they do so.  But talk is cheap.
    So here’s my proposal: require that everyone seeking high-level elective government office do so anonymously.
    Each candidate for office gets a new, sterile name – something that reads like an abbreviated VIN for a automobile.  For example: 8ANJf9.  In fact, call it a PIN – “politician identification number.”
    Each candidate, successful or no, will for the rest of his or her days and into the future mists of history be known to the public only by his or her PIN.  Candidates’ and elected-officials’ faces will never be seen by the public; they will address the public from behind curtains (both real and virtual), and their voices will be electronically modified so that not even their mothers, spouses, or household pets will recognize their voices.
    History will know them – the good, the bad, the indifferent – only by their PINs.
    They will also be required, during their time in office, to live in spartan government housing, and they will be paid modestly, say, 80 percent of the U.S. median household income.
    My proposal, if adopted, would screen for truly public-spirited people to serve in elected office.  When, say, 8ANJf9, proclaims his or her (we’ll not know the person’s sex) devotion to the greater good and the public weal, that proclamation will be believable.
    Of course, adoption of my proposal is not without its downsides – but yet another hallmark of the economic way of thinking is to recognize the ubiquity of trade-offs.
    All the tawdry ‘glory’ of elected office will be stripped away, so that such offices are no longer sought by fame-seeking megalomaniacs.
    ….
    This proposal stems from a conversation that my buddy Andy Morriss [now Dean of the Texas A&M law school] and I had in July 2000 in the jungle of Tikal, Guatemala.  Hearing a tour-guide there refer to ancient Mayan rulers as “King 1,” “King 2,” “King 3,” and so on – personal information on these long-dead Ozymandiases is lost – Andy immediately saw the promise of making genuine public servants anonymous.


Political Cartoon


Courtesy of Michael Ramirez via Townhall


Musical Interlude: Christmas Mix 2017


Pentatonix, "Mary, Did You Know?"

Monday, November 27, 2017

Post #3458 M

Quote of the Day

It is better that ten guilty persons escape, 
than that one innocent suffer.
William Blackstone  

Tweet of the Day















Image of the Day




Boudreaux Debates In Favor of Unilateral Free Trade: YES!





State Censorship of Religious Speech









Political Cartoon


Courtesy of Henry Payne via Townhall


Musical Interlude: My Favorite Vocalists


Amy Grant, "Grown-Up Christmas List"

Sunday, November 26, 2017

Post #3457 M

Quote of the Day

Courage does not always roar. 
Sometimes, it is the quiet voice 
at the end of the day saying, 
"I will try again tomorrow".
Anonymous  

Tweet of the Day



























Facebook Corner


(Feminists For Life). Noteworthy: Men care less than women about their boss' gender, and younger women want a female boss more than older women.
Workplace campaigns are ongoing this fall. FFL's CFC number is 10499 -- or please write us in if you are not a federal employee. Thank you!

Nope. My experience is only anecdotal, but I can say, by far, the worst bosses I've ever had have been women--at least 4 I know have been abominations to the profession. They tended to have a chip on the shoulders (it's because I'm a woman, isn't it?), micromanaged and explicitly threatened, were literally incompetent (I work in the IT profession), and were petty, presumptuous and judgmental. I could go into details, but I'm not going to go into detail in a feminist forum, where I seriously doubt people are receptive to frank discussions.

Oh, to be sure I've also had a couple of cartoonishly bad male bosses, one when I was a professor at UTEP. There are nuances among all of these, but the male bosses tended to be more secure and less defensive, less obtrusive and more willing to delegate authority.

I will give an illustrative example, not a direct report but a client female VP with the power to have me walked out of the building with a single phone call. My contractor DBA predecessor had been walked off after just 2 weeks, and I was sent to replace her (and was there far longer).

I don't want to get into the technical weeds, but the client was an American subsidiary of airport shops specializing in tax-preferred merchandise, operating out of the Baltimore suburbs. The HR department had licensed a product to an ERP suite I specialized in; use of the product required a specialized upgrade driver patch. The accountants were opposed to this (because of fear-mongering by troublemaking, incompetent consultants); this plays later in this comment. The upgrade patch failed--which I had never seen happen before. In researching the problem, I discovered that the database character set (set at database creation) was a default US7ASCII, even though the environment was set to reflect the correct prerequisite Western European character set.

The database publisher basically required the problem to be resolved by recreating the database under the right character set and importing the current database into it. The current production DBA was a long-term contractor, more of a developer (programmer) who eventually inherited the role. He went to the client VP saying there was a simple solution and that I was simply trying to rack up costly billable hours. (In fact, the publisher specifically noted what they described was a temporary fix until the client did the certified migration. I told the client VP they could hire other consultants, check out what I was saying with other experts, etc. I proved that I could do the patch on a database with the correct character set. I further proved that the problem occurred when they hired a third-party DBA to migrate the database--I had a copy of the database build logs where he created the database, implicitly with the default US7ASCII.

But even after I had made an exhaustive, definitive case about the character set being wrong. I found myself scheduled into a gotcha interview (sort of she won't let it go, a variant of nagging). She proudly held documentation that the database publisher supported US7ASCII. Once again, I pointed out in the ERP technical manual, Appendix A, it specifically noted a specific Western European character set had to be used. The database publisher supported several character sets, but its ERP software required a specific, non-default character set.

She finally accepted the point, but it was like pulling teeth. In contrast, when I worked for Oracle Consulting, managers usually handed me keys to the car (figuratively speaking) and said to let them know if any of their people were getting in the way.

One day she pulls me into a personal meeting and explains that she's tired of the bickering between accounting and HR. (Accountants had been told if we added the HRMS module, their financial apps would break. Totally bogus rumor. I told anyone who would listen to me that it was fear-mongering BS.) So she, in her Solomonic wisdom, would give the accountants and HR department their own separate ERP database. I strenuously object to this utterly insane idea. This defeats the very concept of an ERP database; it's a conceptual error of the first order. This is a problem of incompetent contractor troublemakers.

She continues to persist in this delusional idea, calling me in to tell me that this splitting of an ERP database; in fact, some of her fellow IT managers in the area have done it. I was shocked; how is it that multiple IT managers didn't understand the concept of an ERP database? I decided to humor her--give me the phone number of a DBA from a customer who did it.

So I call him and asked if that happened. "Yeah, about two years ago. Dumbest move ever, a problem from day one. We've been trying to reunify the database ever since then. Do you know how to undo the split?" Nope. First, do no harm.

How that executive wasn't aware of his own company's problems post-split, I don't know. I think my client dropped the idea, but I soon left for another assignment. But I did not think much of that manager's analytic or decision-making skills.


For once, Bernie Sanders is right. A broken clock is right twice a day.

Legalize Prostitution




Economic Liberty




Political Cartoon

Courtesy of Bob Gorrell via Townhall

Musical Interlude: Christmas Mix 2017


Jim Brickman (featuring Susan Ashton & Collin Raye), "The Gift"

Saturday, November 25, 2017

Post #3456 M

Quote of the Day

Failure is unimportant. 
It takes courage to make a fool of yourself.
Charlie Chaplin 


Tweet of the Day














Image of the Day



The Private Sector Is the Best Regulator




Ron Paul On Saudi Arabia, Yemen, and the US




Ben Sasse



Political Cartoon

Courtesy of Steve Kelley via Townhall


Musical Interlude: Christmas Mix 2017


TSO, "Christmas Canon Rock". Just perfect! The lead vocals and harmonies, the rock arrangement.

Post #3455 J

Don't Believe Everything You Read On the Internet


Anyone who has read my blog over the last couple of years knows that I have been a sharp critic of Lincoln, It probably started with DiLorenzo's essays (I first became a fan of his work over essays on economic fascism and so-called natural monopolies, only later becoming familiar with his controversial books on Lincoln); I've since read numerous posts and Youtube videos by him on related topics. They have influenced my perspective, but I've also read Lincoln's inaugural address and numerous other writers' work.

I subscribe to a number of pro-liberty emails/digests, and one of them is for Lew Rockwell's own website. (Rockwell is close to Ron Paul, once one of his staffers. He's been in a leadership position with the Mises Institute, with a tilt toward the Austrian School of Economics.) This is rather an idiosyncratic grab bag and an acquired taste, with more mainstream libertarian articles mixed with conspiracy type pieces, and Rockwell has hugely enjoyed Trump's success against the GOP establishment. (I've never quite understood that, because Rockwell is an anarcho-capitalist, anti-war while Trump is an authoritarian who basically says that he won't touch entitlements while pushing for an increase in defense spending.) He's got a huge stable of contributors; I'm not sure if it's by invitation; I certainly haven't been asked to contribute, and I didn't see where I could submit a piece. This is not a personal rant (after all, I have my own blog); it's just context for discussing this one article.)

Tara Dodrill  wrote "The Whitewashed Tyranny of Abraham Lincoln". I was intrigued, but I had never heard of Ms. Dodrill, who apparently writes for some natural health portal. (Rockwell does seem to have a fondness for the natural health folks, like Dr. Mercola.) Let me first say that this piece is well-written (i.e., readable) from an author's vs. researcher's perspective. I'm not an historian by academic training, but a few obvious things jumped out at me. This is not meant to be a comprehensive critique, but my criticisms are significant enough to call the article into question. Granted, Rockwell has a disclaimer over articles posted to his website:

"After intense debate over a slew of possible candidates, Abraham Lincoln, after three votes were taken, received the nomination. During his one term in the Senate, the press had cast Lincoln as a strong all-American man, with an inspiring pull-yourself-up by the bootstraps story."
Abraham Lincoln never served in the US Senate, despite his related 1858 debates against incumbent IL US Senator Stephen A. Douglas (recall state legislators chose the US Senators at the time). The author is probably referring to Lincoln's one term in the US House a decade earlier.

Infamous socialist Karl Marx also saw the Civil War for exactly what it was. He wrote, “The war between the North and South is a tariff war. The war, is further, not for any principle, does not touch the question of slavery, and in fact turns on the Northern lustfor power.”
I read a lot of Karl Marx for a course in social philosophy back in college, and that does NOT sound like Marx. The rebellion of slaves vs. slaveholders works right into his theme of class struggle. Keep in mind Marx sold a number of op-ed's to Northern newspapers during the war.

Researching the quote, I stumbled upon this discussion (note the posted link to the original material is no longer valid and I have not accessed the original passages, but here is that discussant's commentary:
Like many people, I have seen the quote attributed to Marx ("The war between the North and South is a tariff war. The war is, further, not for any principle, does not touch the question of slavery and in fact turns on Northern lust for sovereignty.") bandied about as "proof" that the American Civil War was about "money" or "power" or something else -- anything but slavery. I always felt that sounded odd, not at all like other things I had seen from Marx and Engels over the years in relation to the war, but I have been too lazy to actually look for the original source to see what Marx himself meant and said. Now that you have made it so easy, I have actually gone and read the original -- lo and behold, the snippet of a quote so commonly seen online is taken out of context and is a complete distortion of what Marx was saying.
Actually reading the article Marx wrote in its' entirety makes the distortion of his words usually seen obvious. The whole purpose of his article is to make crystal clear the hypocrisy of those who make the claim that the war is about tariffs or something other than slavery -- yet the two sentences are taken out of context to "prove" that he did. Where a reading of the article makes clear that his words were dripping with sarcasm, the isolated use of the two sentences tries to make it seem he was supporting a view he disagreed with totally. 

Let me point out that I completely disagree with idea that this was a holy war against slavery: In fact, Lincoln did seem to enforce the Fugitive Slave Law in Union slave states/DC. But using bogus quotes to embellish one's side of the argument, never mind the dubious endorsement of Karl Marx, is intellectually dishonest.

Then there's this mind-blowing gem:
Another point of fact that modern history textbooks omit is why Fort Sumter was the place that Lincoln chose to make a stand. It was not merely a military fort. Fort Sumter was a tariff collection facility. The president’s attempt to terrorize the South into submission by assaulting Fort Sumter was an epic and very bloody failure.
I take this one a little personally because my family visited Ft. Sumter while I was in junior high. First of all, the Union occupied Ft. Sumter; Lincoln did not assault it. It was Confederates who bombarded Ft. Sumter. Lincoln would then use the initial attack on Ft. Sumter to justify invasion of the South. Second, the attack on Ft. Sumter was hardly bloody (no casualties) and ended up in a Union Army surrender.

Friday, November 24, 2017

Post #3454 M

Quote of the Day

Live as if you were to die tomorrow. 
Learn as if you were to live forever.
Gandhi  


Tweet of the Day





































Tom Woods On Government Waste




Ron Paul On the US, Saudi Arabia, and Yemen




Campus, Sex and Blurry Lines



Political Cartoon

Courtesy of Henry Payne via Townhall


Musical Interlude: Christmas Mix 2017


Faith Hill, "Where Are You, Christmas?"