Ideas shape the course of history.
John Maynard Keynes
Tweet of the Day
#IAmSickenedBy political whores, from the left and the right, seeking to exploit mass shootings for their own benefit— Ronald Guillemette (@raguillem) June 13, 2016
#IAmSickenedBy people who trust the State with their freedom and economic future, the economically illiterate cultists of Trump and Sanders— Ronald Guillemette (@raguillem) June 13, 2016
Why is it these people, like a former cop who worked with Mateen on security calling him unhinged, come out of the woodwork after a tragedy?— Ronald Guillemette (@raguillem) June 13, 2016
Trump once again proves to be a crackpot conspiracy theorist suggesting something sinister in Obama's choice of language to describe tragedy— Ronald Guillemette (@raguillem) June 13, 2016
@HollisMulwrayV @Bjornapoor @TheFix Until we reach a crisis. The entitlement budget is unsustainable.— Ronald Guillemette (@raguillem) June 13, 2016
I am getting as intolerant of Trump's political spin as I am of Obama's.No, Trump, the issue isn't political correctness. It's your rhetoric— Ronald Guillemette (@raguillem) June 13, 2016
For Trump and other professed Christians making judgments on Muslim moral standards,I suggest you read Leviticus 20:13,with which I disagree— Ronald Guillemette (@raguillem) June 13, 2016
What do you think fundamentalist Jews or Christians might do? https://t.co/7zzXfOovqQ pic.twitter.com/t9rGObdWH5— Ronald Guillemette (@raguillem) June 13, 2016
So, Donald Trump, who has admitted to adultery, according to Leviticus, you and your mistresses should have been put to death. Do you agree?— Ronald Guillemette (@raguillem) June 13, 2016
Trump seems to confound reckless impulsive machismo with serious foreign policy. Clinton's foreign policy has its own problems.— Ronald Guillemette (@raguillem) June 13, 2016
Trump seems to think using blunt language and threatening to resurrect policies of torture constitutes strength. It weakens alliances.— Ronald Guillemette (@raguillem) June 13, 2016
@HollisMulwrayV @Bjornapoor @TheFix Freaking corrupt, envious bastard. No, the economy needs savings and investments, seed corn for growth.— Ronald Guillemette (@raguillem) June 14, 2016
@nytimes What we can do is restrict the availability of people who can can kill thousands of civilians: vote for noninterventionists, LP.— Ronald Guillemette (@raguillem) June 14, 2016
#PeopleUnderestimateMy ability to bore a classroom— Ronald Guillemette (@raguillem) June 14, 2016
— Ronald Guillemette (@raguillem) June 14, 2016
Headline of the Day: Cato Institute "Socialism Destroys Venezuela as its People Feel the “Bern”"— Ronald Guillemette (@raguillem) June 14, 2016
Progressives use apple and orange statistics to inflate the number of mass shootings in the US https://t.co/TfvwpKfS9e— Ronald Guillemette (@raguillem) June 14, 2016
Apparently WikiLeaks intends to publish some of the emails from the server that the Clinton campaign insists was never breached by hackers.— Ronald Guillemette (@raguillem) June 14, 2016
@Trumpbart This is too good not to mock: https://t.co/QBL6OSlZ0R— Ronald Guillemette (@raguillem) June 14, 2016
Image of the DayChris Christie denies that he recently fetched Trump's McDonald's lunch order with his: he orders twice for himself. #sarcasm— Ronald Guillemette (@raguillem) June 14, 2016
Facebook Corner
(National Review).
(National Review). Why is Obama’s first reaction always to find perceived fault within American society rather than with radical Islamism, an ideology certainly at odds with all progressive notions of gay rights, feminism, and religious tolerance?
No. Anyone thinking that vocabulary is the problem is in a state of denial. National Review seems obsessed with high-profile infrequent atrocities but ignores the unjustiable horrific costs of collateral damages of our interventions in other nation's affairs.
A comment I wrote to a nephew's private post not directly discussing the Orlando tragedy but implicitly suggesting regulations to prevent tragedies.
Nope. I oppose restrictions on freedoms, period. There are reasononable steps which can be taken to mitigate risks. For example, although you aren't specifically talking about Orlando, Florida forbids open/concealed guns. Almost all mass shootings occur in a gun-free zone. When you restrict the right of people to protect themselves, you actually worsen the problem.
[He continued his argument. As a matter of blog policy, I normally don't discuss friends or relatives, and so I'm editing the discussion. He pointed out the gay club did employ security. Let's just say he has more faith in State restrictions that I do; among other things, he brings up the usefulness of traffic regulations.]
There are so many things wrong with what you said, I don't have the time or patience to discuss it all, and I'm not going to continue after this comment; I may blog on the topic later.
I'll point out just in discussion of Orlando, the shooter himself worked security--and the first thing he would do is take out security. That's totally nonresponsive to the point I was raising. He knew once he took out security, the victims would be defenseless, and that's the point. If some of the patrons were armed, he would not have known that--and that's the point. You take a risk you might be outnumbered or blind-sided. (Now of course, the perpetrator was suspected, although it may not have been confirmed, that he wore a suicide vest.)
Even in your example of traffic laws: there's a whole literature in the pro-liberty movement just dealing with this. There's a known issue of moral hazard--that people who approach an unlighted intersection are more likely to drive defensively, that a large number of accidents occur because drivers assume others are obeying traffic laws.
Choose Life: Post-Delivery Reunion
Larry Elder and the War on Black Families
Political Cartoon
Courtesy of Henry Payne via Townhall |
Whitney Houston, 'My Name Is Not Susan"